Silvia Rodríguez Vázquez
ABSTRACT
The number of Internet users has increased tenfold since the beginning of the century up to present, especially thanks to the improvements experienced in web accessibility and the growing number of languages which online content is available in. While translation professionals are making a considerable contribution to that digital information richness, little evidence exists regarding their involvement in the achievement of a more accessible web for all. In this paper, we present the main results of the first empirical study on web accessibility conceived around a translation task. The experiment sought to particularly investigate the quality of image text alternatives produced by French translators with the help of two evaluation tools: aDesigner and Acrolinx. The assessment of their alt text proposals, carried out by seven screen reader users, suggests that using both tools helps translators to create more appropriate text alternatives than when trying to do so with only one tool or without any automated support. A more in-depth analysis of the data gathered shows that Acrolinx offers better guidance than aDesigner for translators to render images accessible.
- von Ahn, L. and Dabbish, L. 2004. Labeling Images with a Computer Game. In Proceedings of CHI 2004, Vienna, Austria, April 2004. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- von Ahn, L., Ginosar, S., Kedia, M., Liu, R. and Blum, M. 2006. Improving Accessibility of the Web with a Computer Game. In Proceedings of CHI 2006, Montréal, Québec, Canada, April 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Asakawa, C. 2005. What's the Web Like if You Can'T See It? In Proceedings of W4A 2005. Chiba, Japan, May 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bigham, J., Kaminsky, R., Ladner, R., Danielsson, O. and Hempton, G. 2006. WebInSight: Making Images Accessible. In Proceedings of ASSETS 2006, Portland, Oregon, USA, October 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bigham, J. 2007. Increasing Web Accessibility by Automatically Judging Alternative Text Quality. In Proceedings of IUI 2007. Honolulu, USA, January 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brajnik, G. 2004. Comparing accessibility evaluation tools: a method for tool effectiveness. Universal Access in the Information Society. 3 (3-4), 252--263. Springer, Berlin. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bredenkamp, A., Crysmann, B. and Petrea, M. 2000. Looking for Errors: A Declarative Formalism for Resource-Adaptive Language Checking. In Proceedings of LREC 2000, Athens, Greece, May 2000.Google Scholar
- Caldwell, B., Cooper, M., Reid, L. and Vanderheiden, G. (eds). 2008. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/.Google Scholar
- Craven, T. 2006. Some features of alt texts associated with images in Web pages. Information Research, 11(2).Google Scholar
- Debove, A., Furlan, S. and Depraetere, I. 2011. A Contrastive Analysis of Five Automated QA Tools. In Depraetere, I. (ed). Perspectives on Translation Quality, 161--92. Text, Translation, Computational Processing (TTCP) 9. De Gruyter Mouton, Germany.Google Scholar
- Faulkner, S. (ed). 2014. HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives. (W3C) Working Draft. http://www.w3.org/TR/html-alt-techniques/Google Scholar
- Fischer, D. and Wyatt, T. 2011. The case for a WCAG-based evaluation scheme with a graded rating scale. In Proceedings of the W3C WAI Symposium on Website Accessibility Metrics. Article 7. http://www.w3.org/WAI/RD/2011/metrics/paper7/.Google Scholar
- Folaron, D. 2012. Digitalizing translation. Translation Spaces. John Benjamins, 1 (2012), 5--31.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Harper, S. and Chen, A. 2012. Web Accessibility Guidelines: A Lesson from the Evolving Web. World Wide Web. 15 (1): 61--88. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hu, J. and Bagga, A. 2003. Identifying Story and Preview Images in News Web Pages. In Proceedings of ICDAR 2003, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, August 2003. IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- ISO/EC TS 20071-11:2012. Guidance for alternative text for images. 2012. Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC).Google Scholar
- Ivory, M. and Hearst, M. 2001. The State of the Art in Automating Usability Evaluation. ACM Computing Surveys, 33(4), December 2001, 470--516. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Keysers, D., Renn, M. and Breuel, T. 2007. Improving Accessibility of HTML Documents by Generating Image-Tags in a Proxy. In Proceedings of ASSETS 2007, Tempe, Arizona, USA, October 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Korpela, J. 2010. Guidelines on alt texts in IMG elements. https://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/alt.html.Google Scholar
- Lazar, J., Dudley-Sponaugle, A., and Greenidge, K. 2004. Improving Web Accessibility: A Study of Webmaster Perceptions. The Compass of Human-Computer Interaction 20 (2): 269--88.Google Scholar
- Nyberg, E., Mitamura, T. and Olaf-Huijsen, W. 2003. Controlled Language for Authoring and Translation. In Somers, H. (ed), Computers and Translation. A Translator's Guide, 245--81. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
- O'Brien, S. 2012. Translation as Human-Computer Interaction. Translation Spaces, John Benjamins, 1 (2012), 101--122.Google ScholarCross Ref
- O'Brien, S., and Roturier, J. 2007. How Portable Are Controlled Language Rules? A Comparison of Two Empirical MT Studies. In Proceedings of MT Summit XI, 345--52. Copenhagen, Denmark. September, 2007.Google Scholar
- Olsen, M., Snaprud, M. and Nietzio, A. 2010. Automatic Checking of Alternative Text on Web Pages. In Miesenberger et al. (eds), ICCHP 2010, Part I, 425--432. Springer, Berlin. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Petrie, H., Harrison, C. and Dev, S. 2005. Describing images on the Web: a survey of current practice and prospects for the future. In Proceedings of HCII 2005, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, July 2005.Google Scholar
- Petrie, H., Power, C., Swallow, D., Velasco, C. A., Gallagher, B., Magennis, M., Murphy, E., Collin, S. and Down, K. 2011. The value chain for web accessibility: challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of ADDW 2011, Sun SITE Central Europe.Google Scholar
- R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
- Richards, J., Montague, K. and Hanson, V. 2012. Web Accessibility as a Side Effect. In Proceedings of ASSETS 2012, Boulder, Colorado, USA, October 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rodríguez Vázquez, S. 2015. Unlocking the Potential of Web Localizers as Contributors to Image Accessibility: What Do Evaluation Tools Have to Offer? In Proceedings of W4A 2015, Florence, Italy, May 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rodríguez Vázquez, S. 2015. Exploring Current Accessibility Challenges in the Multilingual Web for Visually-Impaired Users. In The 24th World Wide Web (WWW) Conference 2015 Companion Volume. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rodríguez Vázquez, S. 2015. A controlled language-based evaluation approach to ensure image accessibility during web localisation. Translation Spaces. John Benjamins. 4 (2): 187--215.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rodríguez Vázquez, S. and Bolfing, A. 2013. Multilingual Website Assessment for Accessibility: a Survey on Current Practices. In Proceedings of ASSETS 2013, Bellevue, WA, USA, October 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rodríguez Vázquez, S., Bouillon, P. and Bolfing, A. 2014. Applying Accessibility-Oriented Controlled Language (CL) Rules to Improve Appropriateness of Text Alternatives for Images: An Exploratory Study. In Proceedings of LREC 2014, Reykjavik, Iceland, May 2014.Google Scholar
- Rodríguez Vázquez, S. and Lehmann, S. 2015. Acrolinx: a Controlled-Language Checker Turned into an Accessibility Evaluation Tool for Image Text Alternatives. In Proceedings of W4A 2015, Florence, Italy, May 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rösener, C. 2010. Computational Linguistics in the Translator's Workflow--Combining Authoring Tools and Translation Memory Systems. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Writing, Los Angeles, California, June 2010. ACL, 1--6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Roturier, J. 2006. An Investigation into the Impact of Controlled English Rules on the Comprehensibility, Usefulness and Acceptability of Machine-Translated Technical Documentation for French and German Users. PhD Thesis. Dublin City University, Ireland.Google Scholar
- Sandrini, P. 2008. Localization and Translation. MuTra Journal, 2 (2008), 167--191.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, T., and Matson, R. 2000. Barriers to use: usability and content accessibility on the Web's most popular sites. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability (CUU'00). Arlington, USA, November 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tang, L. 2012. Producing informative text alternatives for images. PhD thesis. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Velasco, C. and Abou-Zahra, S. (eds). 2014. Developers' Guide to Features of Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools. W3C First Public Working Draft.Google Scholar
- Vigo, M. and Brajnik, G. 2011. Automatic web accessibility metrics: where we are and where we can go. Interacting with Computers. Elsevier, 23(2), 127--155. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vigo, M., Brown, J. and Conway, V. 2013. Benchmarking Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools: Measuring the Harm of Sole Reliance on Automated Tests. In Proceedings of W4A 2013, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, May 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vinyals, O., Toshev, A., Bengio, S. and Ehran, D. 2014. Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generator. CoRR, abs/1411.4555. http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.4555.Google Scholar
- Web Accessibility in Mind, WebAIM. 2013. Alternative Text. http://webaim.org/techniques/alttext/Google Scholar
- Yesilada, Y., Brajnik, G., Vigo, M. and Harper, S. 2015. Exploring perceptions of web accessibility: a survey approach. Behaviour & Information Technology. 34:2, 119--134. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Measuring the impact of automated evaluation tools on alternative text quality: a web translation study
Recommendations
Increasing web accessibility by automatically judging alternative text quality
IUI '07: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Intelligent user interfacesThe lack of appropriate alternative text for web images remains a problem for blind users and others accessing the web with non-visual interfaces. The content contained within web images is vital for understanding many web sites but the majority are ...
Comparison of Free and Open Source WCAG Accessibility Evaluation Tools
NISS '23: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Networking, Intelligent Systems & SecurityAccess to the internet is essential to any individual, including people with disabilities that encounter many challenges and obstacles while browsing the Web. To tackle those problems, the Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) [1], since its creation in ...
Web accessibility evaluation of top-ranking university Web sites in Spain, Chile and Mexico
AbstractThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the web accessibility of home pages of universities in Spain, Chile and Mexico. The sample used in this study was the 15 top universities listed in the ranking Webometrics. The study has been carried out ...
Comments