skip to main content
10.1145/2908812.2908844acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgeccoConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Fast and Effective Optimisation of Arrays of Submerged Wave Energy Converters

Published:20 July 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Renewable forms of energy are becoming increasingly important to consider, as the global energy demand continues to grow. Wave energy is one of these widely available forms, but it is largely unexploited. A common design for a wave energy converter is called a point absorber or buoy. The buoy typically floats on the surface or just below the surface of the water, and captures energy from the movement of the waves. It can use the motion of the waves to drive a pump to generate electricity and to create potable water. Since a single buoy can only capture a limited amount of energy, large-scale wave energy production necessitates the deployment of buoys in large numbers called arrays. However, the efficiency of arrays of buoys is affected by highly complex intra-buoy interactions. The contributions of this article are two-fold. First, we present an approximation of the buoy interactions model that results in a 350-fold computational speed-up to enable the use inside of iterative optimisation algorithms, Second, we study arrays of fully submerged three-tether buoys, with and without shared mooring points.

References

  1. A. Babarit. On the park effect in arrays of oscillating wave energy converters. Renewable Energy, 58: 68 -- 78, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Babarit, J. Hals, M. Muliawan, A. Kurniawan, T. Moan, and J. Krokstad. Numerical estimation of energy delivery from a selection of wave energy converters -- final report. Report, Ecole Centrale de Nantes & Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Babarit, J. Hals, M. Muliawan, A. Kurniawan, T. Moan, and J. Krokstad. Numerical benchmarking study of a selection of wave energy converters. Renewable Energy, 41: 44--63, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. S. Bellew, T. Stallard, and P. Stansby. Optimisation of a heterogeneous array of heaving bodies. In Proceedings of the 8th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference, pp. 519--527, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Chertok. Wave-actuated power take-off device for electricity generation. Report, Resolute Marine Energy, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. B. Child and V. Venugopal. Optimal configurations of wave energy device arrays. Ocean Engineering, 37: 1402--1417, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. A. de Andrés, R. Guanche, L. Meneses, C. Vidal, and I. Losada. Factors that influence array layout on wave energy farms. Ocean Engineering, 82: 32--41, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. B. Drew, A. Plummer, and M. N. Sahinkaya. A review of wave energy converter technology. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part A: Journal of Power and Energy, 223: 887--902, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. A. F. O. Falcao. Wave energy utilization: A review of the technologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14: 899--918, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. J. Falnes. Ocean waves and oscillating systems: Linear interactions including wave-energy extraction. Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. C. Fitzgerald and G. Thomas. A preliminary study on the optimal formation of an array of wave power devices. In Proceedings of the 7th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. P. B. Garcia-Rosa, G. Bacelli, and J. V. Ringwood. Control-informed optimal array layout for wave farms. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 6: 575--582, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. J. Hals, J. Falnes, and T. Moan. A comparison of selected strategies for adaptive control of wave energy converters. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 133: 031101, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier. Adapting arbitrary normal mutation distributions in evolution strategies: the covariance matrix adaptation. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 312--317, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. M. A. Hemer and D. A. Griffin. The wave energy resource along Australia's southern margin. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2, Art. 043108, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M. Lagoun, A. Benalia, and M. Benbouzid. Ocean wave converters: State of the art and current status. In IEEE International Energy Conference, pp. 636--641, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. C.-H. Lee. WAMIT Theory Manual. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. C. Linton. Radiation and diffraction of water waves by a submerged sphere in finite depth. Ocean Engineering, 18: 61 -- 74, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. I. López, J. Andreu, S. Ceballos, I. M. de Alegría, and I. Kortabarria. Review of wave energy technologies and the necessary power-equipment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 27: 413--434, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. P. A. Lynn. Electricity from Wave and Tide: An Introduction to Marine Energy. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. L. Mann, A. Burns, and M. Ottaviano. CETO, a carbon free wave power energy provider of the future. In Proceedings of the 7th European Wave and Tidal Energy Conference, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. L. D. Mann. Application of ocean observations & analysis: The CETO wave energy project. In Operational Oceanography in the 21st Century, pp. 721--729. Springer, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. A. McCabe, G. Aggidis, and M. Widden. Optimizing the shape of a surge-and-pitch wave energy collector using a genetic algorithm. Renewable Energy, 35: 2767--2775, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. M. Mohamed, G. Janiga, E. Pap, and D. Thévenin. Multi-objective optimization of the airfoil shape of Wells turbine used for wave energy conversion. Energy, 36: 438--446, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. G. Nunes, D. Valério, P. Beirao, and J. S. Da Costa. Modelling and control of a wave energy converter. Renewable Energy, 36: 1913--1921, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. S. H. Salter. Wave power. Nature, 249: 720--724, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. J. T. Scruggs, S. M. Lattanzio, A. A. Taflanidis, and I. L. Cassidy. Optimal causal control of a wave energy converter in a random sea. Applied Ocean Research, 42: 1--15, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. N. Y. Sergiienko, B. S. Cazzolato, B. Ding, and M. Arjomandi. Frequency domain model of the three-tether WECs array. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291972368_Frequency_domain_model_of_the_three-tether_WECs_array, 2016. {Online; accessed 2-February-2016}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. M. A. Srokosz. The submerged sphere as an absorber of wave power. Fluid Mechanics, 95: 717--741, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. G. X. Wu. Radiation and diffraction by a submerged sphere advancing in water waves of finite depth. Proceedings: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 448: 29--54, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Fast and Effective Optimisation of Arrays of Submerged Wave Energy Converters

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        GECCO '16: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2016
        July 2016
        1196 pages
        ISBN:9781450342063
        DOI:10.1145/2908812

        Copyright © 2016 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 July 2016

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        GECCO '16 Paper Acceptance Rate137of381submissions,36%Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%

        Upcoming Conference

        GECCO '24
        Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference
        July 14 - 18, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader