skip to main content
10.1145/2933575.2933604acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageslicsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Graphs of relational structures: restricted types

Published:05 July 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

In our LICS 2004 paper we introduced an approach to the study of the local structure of finite algebras and relational structures that aims at applications in the Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP). This approach involves a graph associated with an algebra A or a relational structure A, whose vertices are the elements of A (or A), the edges represent subsets of A such that the restriction of some term operation of A is 'good' on the subset, that is, act as an operation of one of the 3 types: semilattice, majority, or affine. In this paper we significantly refine and advance this approach. In particular, we prove certain connectivity and rectangularity properties of relations over algebras related to components of the graph connected by semilattice and affine edges. We also prove a result similar to 2-decomposition of relations invariant under a majority operation, only here we do not impose any restrictions on the relation. These results allow us to give a new, somewhat more intuitive proof of the bounded width theorem: the CSP over algebra A has bounded width if and only if A does not contain affine edges. Actually, this result shows that bounded width implies width (2,3). We also consider algebras with edges from a restricted set of types. In particular, it can be proved that type restrictions are preserved under the standard algebraic constructions. Finally, we prove that algebras without semilattice edges have few subalgebras of powers, that is, the CSP over such algebras is also polynomial time.

References

  1. K. Baker and A. Pixley. Polynomial interpolation and the Chinese Remainder theorem. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 143:165--174, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. L. Barto. The dichotomy for conservative constraint satisfaction problems revisited. In LICS, pages 301--310, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. Barto. The collapse of the bounded width hierarchy. J. of Logic and Computation, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. L. Barto. The constraint satisfaction problem and universal algebra. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 21(3):319--337, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. L. Barto. Finitely related algebras in congruence modular varieties have few subpowers. Available at http://www.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~barto/Articles/ValerioteConjecture.pdf, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. L. Barto and M. Kozik. Absorbing subalgebras, cyclic terms, and the constraint satisfaction problem. Logical Methods in Computer Science, 8(1), 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. L. Barto and M. Kozik. Constraint satisfaction problems solvable by local consistency methods. J. ACM, 61(1):3:1--3:19, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. Barto, M. Kozik, and R. Willard. Near unanimity constraints have bounded pathwidth duality. In LICS 2012, pages 125--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Berman, P. Idziak, P. Marković, R. McKenzie, M. Valeriote, and R. Willard. Varieties with few subalgebras of powers. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 362(3):1445--1473, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. A. A. Bulatov. Three-element Mal'tsev algebras. Acta Sci. Math (Szeged), 71(3-4):469--500, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. A. Bulatov. A graph of a relational structure and constraint satisfaction problems. In LICS, pages 448--457, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. A. Bulatov. A dichotomy theorem for constraint satisfaction problems on a 3-element set. J. ACM, 53(1):66--120, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. A. Bulatov. Bounded relational width. Available at https://www.cs.sfu.ca/abulatov/papers/relwidth.pdf, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. A. Bulatov. On the CSP dichotomy conjecture. In CSR 2011, pages 331--344, 2011a. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. A. Bulatov. Complexity of conservative constraint satisfaction problems. ACM Trans. Comput. Log., 12(4):24, 2011b. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. A. Bulatov. Graphs of finite algebras, edges, and connectivity. CoRR, abs/1601.07403, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. A. A. Bulatov. Conservative constraint satisfaction re-revisited. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 82(2):347--356, 2016b. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. A. Bulatov and V. Dalmau. A simple algorithm for Mal'tsev constraints. SIAM J. Comput., 36(1):16--27, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. A. Bulatov and P. Jeavons. An algebraic approach to multi-sorted constraints. In CP, pages 183--198, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A. A. Bulatov and M. Valeriote. Recent results on the algebraic approach to the CSP. In Complexity of Constraints - An Overview of Current Research Themes {Result of a Dagstuhl Seminar}., pages 68--92, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. A. A. Bulatov, P. Jeavons, and A. A. Krokhin. Classifying the complexity of constraints using finite algebras. SIAM J. Comput., 34(3):720--742, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. S. Burris and H. Sankappanavar. A course in universal algebra, vol. 78 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, N.Y.-Berlin, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. R. Dechter. Constraint processing. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. T. Feder and M. Vardi. Monotone monadic SNP and constraint satisfaction. In STOC 1993, pages 612--622. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. T. Feder and M. Vardi. The computational structure of monotone monadic SNP and constraint satisfaction: A study through datalog and group theory. SIAM Journal of Computing, 28:57--104, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. P. Hell and Nešetřil. Graphs and homomorphisms, volume 28 of Oxford Lecture Series in Mathematics and its Applications. Oxford University Press, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. P. Hell and J. Nešetřil. On the complexity of H-coloring. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Ser.B, 48:92--110, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. D. Hobby and R. McKenzie. The Structure of Finite Algebras, volume 76 of Contemporary Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. P. M. Idziak, P. Markovic, R. McKenzie, M. Valeriote, and R. Willard. Tractability and learnability arising from algebras with few subpowers. SIAM J. Comput., 39(7):3023--3037, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. P. Jeavons. On the algebraic structure of combinatorial problems. Theoretical Computer Science, 200:185--204, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. P. Jeavons, D. A. Cohen, and M. Gyssens. Closure properties of constraints. J. ACM, 44(4):527--548, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. P. Jeavons, D. Cohen, and M. Cooper. Constraints, consistency and closure. Artificial Intelligence, 101(1-2):251--265, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. K. Kearnes. Idempotent simple algebras. In Logic and algebra (Pontignano, 1994), volume 180 of Lecture Notes in Pure and Appl. Math., pages 529--572. Dekker, New York, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. S. Khot. On the power of unique 2-prover 1-round games. In STOC 2002, pages 767--775. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. P. Kolaitis. Constraint satisfaction, databases, and logic. In IJCAI'03, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. P. Kolaitis and M. Vardi. A game-theoretic approach to constraint satisfaction. In AAAI 2000, pages 175--181. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. B. Larose and L. Zádori. Bounded width problems and algebras. Algebra Universalis, 56(3-4):439--466, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. D. Zhuk. On key relations preserved by a weak near-unanimity function. In ISMVL 2014, pages 61--66, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Graphs of relational structures: restricted types

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      LICS '16: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science
      July 2016
      901 pages
      ISBN:9781450343916
      DOI:10.1145/2933575

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 July 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate143of386submissions,37%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader