skip to main content
10.1145/2934328.2934330acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagese-energyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Non-intrusive model derivation: automated modeling of residential electrical loads

Published:21 June 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

A variety of energy management and analytics techniques rely on models of the power usage of a device over time. Unfortunately, the models employed by these techniques are often highly simplistic, such as modeling devices as simply being on with a fixed power usage or off and consuming little power. As we show, even the power usage of relatively simple devices exhibits much more complexity than a simple on and off state. To address the problem, we present a Non-Intrusive Model Derivation (NIMD) algorithm to automate modeling of residential electric loads using concepts from power systems, statistics, and machine learning. NIMD automatically derives a compact representation of the time-varying power usage of any residential electrical load, including both the device's energy usage and its pattern of usage over time. Such models are useful for a variety of analytics techniques, such as Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring, that have relied on simple on-off models in the past. We evaluate the accuracy of our models by comparing them with both actual ground truth data, and against models that have been designed manually by human experts. We show that models derived via NIMD are comparable in accuracy to models built by experts and closely approximate the ground truth data.

References

  1. K. Armel, A. Gupta, G. Shrimali, and A. Albert. Is Disaggregation the Holy Grail of Energy Efficiency? The Case of Electricity. Energy Policy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. F. Bao, X. Liu, and C. Zhang. PyEEG: An Open Source Python Module for EEG/MEG Feature Extraction. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. S. Barker, S. Kalra, D. Irwin, and P. Shenoy. Empirical Characterization and Modeling of Electrical Loads in Smart Homes. In IGCC, July 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. S. Barker, S. Kalra, D. Irwin, and P. Shenoy. Empirical Characterization, Modeling, and Analysis of Smart Meter Data. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 32(7), July 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. S. Barker, A. Mishra, D. Irwin, E. Cecchet, P. Shenoy, and J. Albrecht. Smart*: An Open Data Set and Tools for Enabling Research in Sustainable Homes. In SustKDD, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. S. Barker, A. Mishra, D. Irwin, P. Shenoy, and J. Albrecht. Smartcap: Flattening Peak Electricity Demand in Smart Homes. In PerCom, March 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. J. Canny. A computational approach to edge detection. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, PAMI-8(6), Nov 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Capps. Energy and IOT. An Engineer's Perspective. XRDS, 22(2), December 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Chen, S. Barker, A. Subbaswamy, D. Irwin, and P. Shenoy. Non-Intrusive Occupancy Monitoring using Smart Meters. In BuildSys, November 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Chib and E. Greenberg. Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm. The American Statistician, 49(4), November 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. M. Ebling and M. Corner. It's all about power and those pesky power vampires. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 8(1), 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Hart. Nonintrusive Appliance Load Monitoring. Proceedings of the IEEE, 80(12), December 19 92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Iyengar, S. Kalra, A. Ghosh, D. Irwin, P. Shenoy, and B. Marlin. iProgram: Inferring Smart Schedules for Dumb Thermostats. In BuildSys, November 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Kelso, editor. 2011 Buildings Energy Data Book. Department of Energy, March 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. W. Kleiminger, C. Beckel, T. Staake, and S. Santini. Occupancy Detection from Electricity Consumption Data. In BuildSys, November 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. J. Kolter and A. Ng. Energy Disaggregation via Discriminative Sparse Coding. In NIPS, December 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. S. Makonin, F. Popowich, L. Bartram, B. Gill, and I. Bajic. AMPds: A Public Dataset for Load Disaggregation and Eco-Feedback Research. In EPEC, October 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. D. Picard. Testing and estimating change-points in time series. Advances in Applied Probability, 17(4), 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Pincus. Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 88(6), 1991.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A. Reinhardt, P. Baumann, D. Burgstahler, M. Hollick, H. Chonov, M. Werner, and R. Steinmetz. On the Accuracy of Appliance Identification Based on Distributed Load Metering Data. In SustainIT, October 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. X. Shao and X. Zhang. Testing for change points in time series. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(491), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Belkin wemo. http://www.wemo.com/, February 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Non-intrusive model derivation: automated modeling of residential electrical loads

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      e-Energy '16: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Future Energy Systems
      June 2016
      266 pages
      ISBN:9781450343930
      DOI:10.1145/2934328

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 June 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate160of446submissions,36%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader