skip to main content
10.1145/2968220.2968242acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvinciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Guided Tour of Literature Review: Facilitating Academic Paper Reading with Narrative Visualization

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Reading academic paper is a daily task for researchers and graduate students. However, reading effectively can be challenging, particularly for novices in scientific research. For example, when readers are reading the related work section that cites a fair number of references in limited page space, they often need to flip back and forth between the text and the references and may also frequently search elsewhere for more information about the references. This increases the difficulty of understanding a paper. In this paper, we propose a narrative visualization system that helps the reading of academic papers. As a first step, we adopt narrative visualization to present literature review as interactive slides. Specifically, we propose a narrative structure with three levels of granularities that the reader can drill down or roll up freely. The logic flow of a slideshow can be organized based on the paper's presentation or citations. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our system through several case studies and user studies. The results show that the system allows users to quickly track and glance related work, making paper reading more effective and enjoyable.

References

  1. Transition words. https://www.msu.edu/user/jdowell/135/transw.html\#anchor1692438.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Wiley online library. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. F. Amini, N. H. Riche, B. Lee, C. Hurter, and P. Irani. Understanding data videos: Looking at narrative visualization through the cinematography lens. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1459--1468. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. E. Bahna and R. J. Jacob. Augmented reading: presenting additional information without penalty. In CHI'05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1909--1912. ACM, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. R. Biedert, G. Buscher, S. Schwarz, J. Hees, and A. Dengel. Text 2.0. In CHI'10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 4003--4008. ACM, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. H. Chau, A. Kittur, J. I. Hong, and C. Faloutsos. Apolo: making sense of large network data by combining rich user interaction and machine learning. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 167--176. ACM, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. W. Cui, S. Liu, L. Tan, C. Shi, Y. Song, Z. Gao, H. Qu, and X. Tong. Textflow: Towards better understanding of evolving topics in text. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 17(12):2412--2421, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Ernst. Writing a technical paper. https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~mernst/advice/write-technical-paper.html\#related-work, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. P. Goffin, W. Willett, J.-D. Fekete, and P. Isenberg. Exploring the placement and design of word-scale visualizations. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. S. Gratzl, A. Lex, N. Gehlenborg, H. Pfister, and M. Streit. Lineup: Visual analysis of multi-attribute rankings. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 19(12):2277--2286, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. Havre, E. Hetzler, P. Whitney, and L. Nowell. Themeriver: Visualizing thematic changes in large document collections. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 8(1):9--20, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. F. Heimerl, Q. Han, and S. Koch. Citerivers: Visual analytics of citation patterns. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 22(1):190--199, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Hullman and N. Diakopoulos. Visualization rhetoric: Framing effects in narrative visualization. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 17(12):2231--2240, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Hullman, S. Drucker, N. H. Riche, B. Lee, D. Fisher, and E. Adar. A deeper understanding of sequence in narrative visualization. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 19(12):2406--2415, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. H. Kang, C. Plaisant, B. Lee, and B. B. Bederson. Netlens: iterative exploration of content-actor network data. Information Visualization, 6(1):18--31, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Koch, M. John, M. Worner, A. Müller, and T. Ertl. Varifocalreader--in-depth visual analysis of large text documents. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. R. S. Laramee. How to write a visualization research paper: A starting point. In Computer Graphics Forum, volume 29, pages 2363--2371. Wiley Online Library, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. R. S. Laramee. How to read a visualization research paper: Extracting the essentials. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 31(3):78--82, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. T. Lavie and N. Tractinsky. Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites. International journal of human-computer studies, 60(3), 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. B. Lee, M. Czerwinski, G. Robertson, and B. B. Bederson. Understanding research trends in conferences using paper-lens. In CHI'05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. R. Lewis. Ibm computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7(1), 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. S. Liu, W. Cui, Y. Wu, and M. Liu. A survey on information visualization: recent advances and challenges. The Visual Computer, 30(12):1373--1393, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. C. D. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schütze. Introduction to information retrieval, volume 1. Cambridge university press Cambridge, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. J. Matejka, T. Grossman, and G. Fitzmaurice. Citeology: visualizing paper genealogy. In CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 181--190. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. P. Montuschi and A. Benso. Augmented reading: The present and future of electronic scientific publications. Computer, 47(1):64--74, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. K. O'hara and A. Sellen. A comparison of reading paper and on-line documents. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 335--342. ACM, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. V. Qazvinian and D. R. Radev. Scientific paper summarization using citation summary networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics-Volume 1, pages 689--696. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. T. Regan and L. Becker. Visualizing the text of (children's) book series. http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/bookviz/default.aspx, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. E. Segel and J. Heer. Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 16(6):1139--1148, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. C. Shi, Y. Wu, S. Liu, H. Zhou, and H. Qu. Loyaltracker: Visualizing loyalty dynamics in search engines. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. R. Socher, A. Perelygin, J. Y. Wu, J. Chuang, C. D. Manning, A. Y. Ng, and C. Potts. Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In Proceedings of the conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP), volume 1631, page 1642. Citeseer, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. J. Stasko, J. Choo, Y. Han, M. Hu, H. Pileggi, R. Sadanaand, and C. D. Stolper. Citevis: Exploring conference paper citation data visually. Posters of IEEE InfoVis, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. M. Tremaine. How to write a technical paper in english. Course material from http://www.eventbrite.com/e/caip-technical-paper-writing-course-tickets-451147394, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Y. Wu, F. Wei, S. Liu, N. Au, W. Cui, H. Zhou, and H. Qu. Opinionseer: interactive visualization of hotel customer feedback. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 16(6):1109--1118, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    VINCI '16: Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Visual Information Communication and Interaction
    September 2016
    173 pages
    ISBN:9781450341493
    DOI:10.1145/2968220

    Copyright © 2016 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 24 September 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    VINCI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate14of42submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate71of193submissions,37%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader