Sara Ljungblad
Olof Torgersson
Eva Eriksson
ABSTRACT
We invite researchers and practitioners to bring a plurality of perspectives related to the use of notions in Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). How could a change of notions affect our perspective on designing technology for people? The aim of the full day workshop is to apply a clothesline approach in order to identify and sort, wash and tumble, some of the notions used in the community, and air them for better alternatives. We will do this by 1) identifying why certain notions are or have been problematic, 2) elaborating them to raise awareness of their possible interpretations and implications in order to find alternatives that are usable across different HCI settings. The outcome of the workshop is to elucidate how notions and their connotations frame the HCI practice.
- Bannon, L. From human factors to human actors: The role of psychology and human-computer interaction studies in system design. In Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems J. Greenbaum and M. Kyng, eds. Erlbaum, 1986, 25--44. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Bødker, S. When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges. Proc. of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Changing Roles. ACM, New York, 2006, 1--8. DOI:10.1145/1182475.1182476 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Derrida, J. 1978. Writing and difference. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Eason, Kenneth D. "User-centred design: for users or by users?." Ergonomics 38.8 (1995): 1667--1673.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Foucault, M. 1969. The Archaeology of Knowledge, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
- Halskov, K., Hansen, N.B. 2015. The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002-2012. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 74, 81--92. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hjort af Ornäs, V., Keitsch, M. and Schulte, K. 2014. Metaphors in Design Curricula. A. Eger, A. Kovacevic, & B. E. Parkinson (Eds.), Design Education & Human Technology Relations - Proceedings of Engineering and Product Design Education. SN 978-1-904670-55-1.Google Scholar
- Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M.1980. Metaphors We Live By, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Schön, D.A. 1993. Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-solving in social policy. A. Ortony, (Ed.): Metaphor and Thought, pp. 137--161, Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Snodgrass, A. and Coyne, R. 1992. Models, Metaphors and the Hermeneutics of Designing. Design Issues, 9(1), 56--74.Google Scholar
- Thies, A., Ljungblad, S. and Stewart Claesson I. 2015 Beyond ICT: How industrial design could contribute to HCI research. Swedish Design Research Journal 1, 2015.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The Clothesline Approach to Notions Concerning the H in HCI
Recommendations
The clothesline approach to notions in participatory design
PDC '16: Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops - Volume 2We invite researchers and practitioners to bring a plurality of perspectives and expertise related to the use of problematic notions in participatory design. How could a change of notions affect our perspective on participation and design? The aim of ...
Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design
CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsFeminism is a natural ally to interaction design, due to its central commitments to issues such as agency, fulfillment, identity, equity, empowerment, and social justice. In this paper, I summarize the state of the art of feminism in HCI and propose ...
A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI
HCI has a complex and often ambivalent attitude towards the issue of gender and interactive systems. Here I discuss three dominant paradigms for treating gender in HCI, and discuss their limitations. Next, I will present the theoretical perspectives on ...
Comments