skip to main content
10.1145/2974804.2974815acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Children's Facial Expressions in Truthful and Deceptive Interactions with a Virtual Agent

Published:04 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The present study focused on the facial expressions that children exhibit while they try to deceive a virtual agent. An interactive lie elicitation game was developed to record children's facial expressions during deceptive and truthful utterances, when doing the task alone or in the presence of peers. Based on manual annotations of their facial expressions, we found that children, while communicating with a virtual agent, produce different facial expressions in deceptive and truthful contexts. It seems that deceptive children try to cover their lie as they smile significantly more than truthful children. Moreover, co-presence enhances children's facial expressive behaviour and the amount of cues to deceit. Deceivers, especially when being together with a friend, more often press their lips, smile, blink and avert their gaze than truth-tellers.

References

  1. Bella M. DePaulo, James J. Lindsay, Brian E. Malone, Laura Muhlenbruck, Kelly Charlton, and Harris Cooper. 2003. Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin 129, 1: 74--118. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Wallace Ekman, Paul Friesen. 1976. Measu ring Facial Movement*. Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behaviour 1, 1: 56--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Genyue Fu, Angela D Evans, Lingfeng Wang, and Kang Lee. 2008. Lying in the name of the collective good: a developmental study. Developmental Science 11, 4: 495--503. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.14677687.2008.00695.x.LyingGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Genyue Fu, Angela D Evans, Fen Xu, and Kang Lee. 2012. Young children can tell strategic lies after committing a transgression. Journal of experimental child psychology 113, 1: 147--58. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.04.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Peter H. Kahn, Jr., Batya Friedman, Deanne R. Pérez-Granados, and Nathan G. Freier. 2006. Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children. Interaction Studies 7: 405--436. http://doi.org/10.1075/is.7.3.13kahGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Stacy Marsella, Lewis Johnson, and Catherine Labore. 2000. Interactive pedagogical drama. AGENTS '00: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Autonomous agents: 301--308. http://doi.org/10.1145/336595.337507 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Yehya Mohamad, Carlos A Velasco, Sylvia Damm, and Holger Tebarth. 2004. Cognitive Training with Animated Pedagogical Agents (TAPA) in Children with Learning Disabilities. Computers Helping People with Special Needs: 629. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/content/y3yt4flv75bm lyk6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Lena Pareto. 2014. A teachable agent game engaging primary school children to learn arithmetic concepts and reasoning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 24, 3: 251--283. http://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0018-8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Chandra Reka Ramachandiran, Nazean Jomhari, Shamala Thiyagaraja, and Malissa Maria. 2015. Virtual reality based behavioural learning for autistic children. Electronic Journal of e-Learning 13, 5: 357--365.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kathryn Y. Segovia and Jeremy N. Bailenson. 2009. Virtually True: Children's Acquisition of False Memories in Virtual Reality. Media Psychology 12, 4: 371--393. http://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903287267Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Mariana Serras Pereira, Yoeri Nijs, Suleman Shahid, and Marc Swerts. 2009. Children's lying behaviour in interactions with personified robots. In press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rachel L. Severson and Stephanie M. Carlson. 2010. Behaving as or behaving as if? Children's conceptions of personified robots and the emergence of a new ontological category. Neural Networks 23, 8--9: 1099--1103. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2010.08.014 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Leif A. Strömwall and P??r Anders Granhag. 2007. Detecting deceit in Pairs of children. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 37, 6: 1285--1304. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00213.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Marc Swerts. 2012. Let's lie together: Co-presence effects on children's deceptive skills. Proceedings of the EACL workshop on computational approaches to deception detection, E. Fitzpatrick, B. Bachenko, & T. Fornaciari (Eds.), 55--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Victoria Talwar and Angela Crossman. 2011. From little white lies to filthy liars. The evolution of honesty and deception in young children. In Advances in Child Development and Behavior (1st ed.). Elsevier Inc., 139--141. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386491-8.00004-Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Victoria Talwar, Heide M. Gordon, and Lee Kang. 2007. Lying in the Elementary School Years: Verbal Deception and Its Relation to Second-Order Belief Understanding Victoria. Developmental psychology 43, 3: 804--810. http://doi.org/10.1037/00121649.43.3.804Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Victoria Talwar and Kang Lee. 2002. Emergence of White-Lie Telling in Children Between 3 and 7 Years of Age. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 48, 2: 160--181. http://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2002.0009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Victoria Talwar and Kang Lee. 2002. Development of lying to conceal a transgression: Children's control of expressive behaviour during verbal deception. International Journal of Behavioral Development 26, 5: 436--444. http://doi.org/10.1080/01650250143000373Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Victoria Talwar, Susan M Murphy, and Kang Lee. 2007. White lie-telling in children for politeness purposes. International Journal of Behavioral Development 31, 1: 1--11. http://doi.org/10.1177/0165025406073530Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Victoria Talwar, Lonnie Zwaigenbaum, Keith J. Goulden, Shazeee. Manji, Carly Loomes, and Carmen Rasmussen. 2012. Lie-Telling Behavior in Children With Autism and Its Relation to FalseBelief Understanding. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 27, 2: 122--129. http://doi.org/10.1177/1088357612441828Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Annelies Vredeveldt and Willem A. Wagenaar. 2013. Within-Pair Consistency in Child Witnesses: The Diagnostic Value of Telling the Same Story. Applied Cognitive Psychology 27, 3: 406--411. http://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2921Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Aldert Vrij1. 2002. Deception in children: A literature review and implications for children's testimony. In Children's Testimony: A Handbook of Psychological Research and Forensic Practice, H.L. Westcott, G. M. Davies and R. H. C. Bull (eds.). John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 175--194. http://doi.org/10.1002/9780470713679.ch12Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Hugh Wagner and Victoria Lee. 1999. Facial behavior alone and in the presence of others. In The Social Context of Nonverbal Behavior, & E.J. Coats P. Philippot, R.S. Feldman (ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press, New York, 262--286.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacqueline Kory Westlund, Cynthia Breazeal, and A Story. 2015. Deception, Secrets, Children, and Robots: What's Acceptable? HRI 2015 Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Children's Facial Expressions in Truthful and Deceptive Interactions with a Virtual Agent

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      HAI '16: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Human Agent Interaction
      October 2016
      414 pages
      ISBN:9781450345088
      DOI:10.1145/2974804

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 October 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      HAI '16 Paper Acceptance Rate29of182submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate121of404submissions,30%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader