skip to main content
10.1145/298151.298231acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Tuple centres for the coordination of Internet agents

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 February 1999Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.G. Agha and C.J. Callsen. Actorspace: an open distributed programming paradigm. A CM Sigplan Notices, 28(7):23--32, July 1993.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.J. Baumann, F. Hohl, N. Hadouniklis, K. Rothermel, and M. $trasser. Communication concepts for mobile agent systems. In Mobile Agents 97, volume 1219 of LNC$, pages 123-135. Springer-Verlag, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.S. Bergamaschi and al. An intelligent approach to information integration. In International Conference on Formal Ontology in in}ormation Systems, Trento, italy, 1~0'J3.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.G. Cabri, L. Leona~i, and F. Zambonelli. The impact of the --J:nation __J_l :_ ,,_ '.~...:-- ..~--..~.:l i,~,UUl'g,I iIIUUC:I Ill kil'~ U'r.,.Oi~ll cations. In Proceedings of the l~l~nd Computer Software and Applications Conjerence, Wien, Austria, August 10098. IEEE CS Press.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.G. Cabri, L. Leonardi, and F. Zambone!li. Reactive tuple $p~ces for!IlI, o01L-"II: i:l,J~:lllb 2nd Workshop on Mobile Agents, volume 1477 of LNC$. Stuttgart, Germany, September 1998. Springer-Verlag.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.L. Cardelli and A. D. Gordon. Mobile ambients. In Foundation o! Software Science and Computational Structures. i998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.N. Carriero and D. Gelernter. Linda in context. Communication,,' o/~;'" a~r, _~9_/at.aaa_4.r~ AnHi 1080_]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.P. C iancarini. Distributed programming with logic tuple spaces. New Generation Computing, 12, 1994.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.P. Ciancarini, R. Tolksdorf, F. Vitali, D. Rossi, and A. Knoche. Coordinating multiagent applications on the WWW: A reference architecture. IEHP-,' 'li'ansactions on Software Engineering, 24(5):362-375, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10.Cremonini, A. um,clni,'" ....... amd F network topology and mobile agent interaction: an integrated framework. In Proceedings o/the 1999 .4 C,~I Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC '99), San Antonio, Texas. 1999.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.E. Denti, A. Natali, and A. Omicini. Programmable coordination media. In Coordination Languages and Models, volume 1282 of LNCS, pages 274-288. Springer-Verlag, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.E. Denti, A. Natali, and A. Omicini. On the expressive power of a language for progruaming coordination media. In Proceedings of the 1998 A CM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC '98), Atlanta, Georgia, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.E. Denti and A. Omicini. Designing multi-agent systerns around an extensible communication abstraction. In A. Cesta and P.-Y. $chobbens, editors, Proceedings of the 4th ModelAge Workshop on Formal Models of Agents, Certosa di Pontignano, Italy, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.P. Domel, A. Lingnau, and O. Drobnik. Mobile agent interaction in heterogeneous environment. In Mobile Agents 97, volume 1219 of LNCS, pages 136-148. Springer-Verlag, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.R. Englemore and T. Morgan, editors. Blackboard Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1988.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.T. Finin, R. Fritzson, D. McKay, and R. McEntire. KQML as an agent communication language. In Proc. of the Third International Con}erence on Information and Knowledge Management, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 1994.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.A. Fuggetta, G. Picco, and G. Vigna. Understanding code mobility. IEEE Transactions on Software Enyineering, 24(5), May 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.D. Gelernter. Generative communication in Linda. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 7(1), January 1985.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. 19.D. Gelernter. Multiple tuple spaces in Linda. In Proceedings o! PARLE, volume 365 of LNCS, 1989.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20.D. Gelernter and N. Carriero. Coordination languages and their significance. Communications of the ACM, 35(2):97- 107, February 1992.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21.M.R. Genesereth and R.E. Filkes. Knowledge Interchange Format: Version 3.0 reference manual. Technical Report Logic-92-1, Computer Science Department, Stanford University, 1992.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.R. Gray. Agent Tel: A flexible and secure mobile-agent system. In Proc. of the Fourth Annual Tcl/Tk Workshop, Monterey, California, July 1996.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23.IBM. T spaces, 1998. http://www.aXamden.ibm.com/ T$paces.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.G. Kappet, S. Rausch-Schott, and W. Retschitzegger. Coordination in workfiow management systems- a rule-based approach. In W. Conen and F. Neumann, editors, Coordination Technoloytt for Collaboration Application, volume 1316 of LNCS. Springer-Verlag, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. 25.N.M. Karnik and A.R. Tripathi. Design issues in mobileagent programming systems. {EEE Concurrency, 6(3):52- 61, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26.J. Kiniry and D. Zimmerman. A hands-on look at Java mobite agents, iEEE internes Computing, 1(4):21-33, July- August 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. 27.N. Minsky and J. Leichter. Law-governed Linda as a coordination model. In Object-Based Models and Languages, volume 924 of LNCS, pages 125-145. Springer-Verlag, 1994.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. 28.A. Ohsuga. Y. Nagai, Y. lrie, M. Hattori, and S. Honiden. PLANGENT: an approach to making mobile agents intelligents. IEEE Internes Computing, 1(3):50-57, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. 29.OMG. CORBA 2.1 specifications, 1997. http://~w.om$ or$.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.A. Omicini. E. Denti, and A. Natali. Agent coordination and control through logic theories. In Topics in Artificial Intelligence. volume 992 of LNAL pages 439-450. Springer- Verlag, 1995.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. 31.A. Omicini and F. Zambonelli. TuCSoN: a coordination model for mobile information agents. In D.C. Schwartz, M. Divitini, and T. Brazethvik, editors, Proceedinys of the First International Workshop on Innovative {nternet Information Syten~ (III$'98), Piss, Italy, 1998.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.G.A. Papadopoulos and F. Arbab. Coordination models and languages. Advances in Computers, 46:The Engineering of Large Systems, August 1998.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.H. Peine and T. Stolpmann. The architecture of the Ara platform for mobile agents, in Mobile Ayents '97, volume 1219 of LNCS, pages 50-61. Springer-Verlag, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. 34.G. Piccine!!i, F. Marcello, and G. Zugliani. An internet-based framework for federated process support. In D.G. Schwartz, M. Divitini, and T. Brazethvik, editors, Proceedings o} the First International Workshop on Innovative lnternet lnformarion Sb, tems (III$'98), Piss, italy, 1998.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.A.I.T. Rowstron. Bulk Primitives in Linda Run. Time Systerns. PhD thesis, The University of York, 1996.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.The JavaSpacesTM specification. Technical report, Sun Microsystems, 1998.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.H. Vogler, M.L. Moschgath, and T. Kunkelmann. Enhancing mobile agents with electronic commerce capabilities. In M. Klusch and G. Weiss, editors, Cooperative Information Agents ll, volume 1435 of LNC$. Springer-Verlag, 1998.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. 38.J. Waldo, G. Wyant, A. Wollrath, and S. Kendall. A note on distributed computing. In Mobile Object Systems, volume 1222 of LNCS, pages 49-64. Springer-Verlag, 1997.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Tuple centres for the coordination of Internet agents

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '99: Proceedings of the 1999 ACM symposium on Applied computing
        February 1999
        635 pages
        ISBN:1581130864
        DOI:10.1145/298151

        Copyright © 1999 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 February 1999

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader