skip to main content
10.1145/2992154.2992179acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multimodal Segmentation on a Large Interactive Tabletop: Extending Interaction on Horizontal Surfaces with Gaze

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 November 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Eye tracking is a promising input modality for interactive tabletops. However, issues such as eyelid occlusion and the viewing angle at distant positions present significant challenges for remote gaze tracking in this setting. We present the results of two studies that explore the way gaze interaction can be enabled. Our first study contributes the results from an empirical investigation of gaze accuracy on a large horizontal surface, finding gaze to be unusable close to the user (due to eyelid occlusion), accurate at arm's length, and only precise horizontally at large distances. In consideration of these results, we propose two solutions for the design of interactive systems that utilise remote gaze-tracking on the tabletop; multimodal segmentation and the use of X-Gaze-our novel technique-to interact with out-of-reach objects. Our second study evaluates and validates both these solutions in a Video-on-Demand application, presenting immediate opportunities for remote-gaze interaction on horizontal surfaces.

References

  1. Abednego, M., Lee, J.-H., Moon, W., and Park, J.-H. I-grabber: Expanding physical reach in a large-display tabletop environment through the use of a virtual grabber. In Proc. of ITS '09, ACM (2009), 61--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ardito, C., Buono, P., Costabile, M. F., and Desolda, G. Interaction with large displays: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 47, 3 (Feb. 2015), 46:1--46:38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bader, T., Vogelgesang, M., and Klaus, E. Multimodal integration of natural gaze behavior for intention recognition during object manipulation. In Proc. of the 2009 Int. Conf. on Multimodal Interfaces, ICMI-MLMI '09, ACM (2009), 199--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Banerjee, A., Burstyn, J., Girouard, A., and Vertegaal, R. Pointable: An in-air pointing technique to manipulate out-of-reach targets on tabletops. In Proc. of ITS '11, ACM (2011), 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bartindale, T., Harrison, C., Olivier, P., and Hudson, S. E. Surfacemouse: Supplementing multi-touch interaction with a virtual mouse. In Proc. of TEI '11, ACM (2011), 293--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Benko, H., Morris, M. R., Brush, A. B., and Wilson, A. D. Insights on interactive tabletops: A survey of researchers and developers. Tech. Rep. MSR-TR-2009--22, March 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Bezerianos, A., and Balakrishnan, R. The vacuum: Facilitating the manipulation of distant objects. In Proc. of CHI '05, ACM (2005), 361--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Collewijn, H., and Tamminga, E. P. Human smooth and saccadic eye movements during voluntary pursuit of different target motions on different backgrounds. The Journal of Physiology 351, 1 (1984), 217--250.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Esteves, A., Velloso, E., Bulling, A., and Gellersen, H. Orbits: Gaze interaction for smart watches using smooth pursuit eye movements. In Proc. of UIST '15, ACM (2015), 457--466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Geller, T. Interactive tabletop exhibits in museums and galleries. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 26, 5 (Sept 2006), 6--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Hardy, J., and Alexander, J. Toolkit support for interactive projected displays. In Proc. of MUM '12, ACM (2012), 42:1--42:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Holman, D. Gazetop: Interaction techniques for gaze-aware tabletops. In CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '07, ACM (2007), 1657--1660. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jacob, R. J. K. What you look at is what you get: Eye movement-based interaction techniques. In Proc. of CHI '90, ACM (1990), 11--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Lander, C., Gehring, S., Krüger, A., Boring, S., and Bulling, A. Gazeprojector: Accurate gaze estimation and seamless gaze interaction across multiple displays. In Proc. of UIST 2015 (2015), 395--404. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Majaranta, P. Communication and Text Entry by Gaze. IGI Global, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Marquardt, N., Jota, R., Greenberg, S., and Jorge, J. A. The continuous interaction space: Interaction techniques unifying touch and gesture on and above a digital surface. In Proc. of INTERACT'11, Springer-Verlag (2011), 461--476. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mauderer, M., Daiber, F., and Krüger, A. Combining touch and gaze for distant selection in a tabletop setting. In CHI 2013: Workshop on Gaze Interaction in the Post-WIMP World (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Parker, J. K., Mandryk, R. L., and Inkpen, K. M. Integrating point and touch for interaction with digital tabletop displays. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE 26, 5 (Sept 2006), 28--35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Pfeuffer, K., Alexander, J., Chong, M. K., and Gellersen, H. Gaze-touch: Combining gaze with multi-touch for interaction on the same surface. In Proc. of UIST '14, ACM (2014), 509--518. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Reetz, A., Gutwin, C., Stach, T., Nacenta, M., and Subramanian, S. Superflick: A natural and efficient technique for long-distance object placement on digital tables. In Proc. of GI '06, Canadian Information Processing Society (2006), 163--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Remy, C., Weiss, M., Ziefie, M., and Borchers, J. A pattern language for interactive tabletops in collaborative workspaces. In Proc. of EuroPLoP '10, ACM (2010), 9:1--9:48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rottach, K. G., Zivotofsky, A. Z., Das, V. E., Averbuch-Heller, L., Discenna, A. O., Poonyathalang, A., and Leigh, R. Comparison of horizontal, vertical and diagonal smooth pursuit eye movements in normal human subjects. Vision Research 36, 14 (1996), 2189--2195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Ryall, K., Forlines, C., Shen, C., Morris, M. R., and Everitt, K. Experiences with and observations of direct-touch tabletops. In Proc. of TABLETOP '06, IEEE Computer Society (2006), 89--96. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Scott, S. D., Carpendale, S., and Inkpen, K. M. Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces. In Proc. of CSCW '04, ACM (2004), 294--303. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Serim, B., and Jacucci, G. Pointing while looking elsewhere: Designing for varying degrees of visual guidance during manual input. In Proceedings of CHI '16, ACM (2016), 5789--5800. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Shen, C. From clicks to touches: Enabling face-to-face shared social interface on multi-touch tabletops. In Proc. of OCSC'07, Springer-Verlag (2007), 169--175. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Shen, C., Ryall, K., Forlines, C., Esenther, A., Vernier, F. D., Everitt, K., Wu, M., Wigdor, D., Morris, M. R., Hancock, M., and Tse, E. Informing the design of direct-touch tabletops. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 26, 5 (Sept. 2006), 36--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Smeaton, A. F., Lee, H., Foley, C., and Mcgivney, S. Collaborative video searching on a tabletop. Multimedia Syst. 12, 4--5 (Mar. 2007), 375--391. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Stellmach, S., and Dachselt, R. Look & touch: Gaze-supported target acquisition. In Proc. of CHI '12, ACM (2012), 2981--2990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Stellmach, S., and Dachselt, R. Still looking: Investigating seamless gaze-supported selection, positioning, and manipulation of distant targets. In Proc. of CHI '13, ACM (2013), 285--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Toney, A., and Thomas, B. H. Considering reach in tangible and table top design. In Proc. of TABLETOP '06, IEEE (2006), 2 pp. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Tse, E., Greenberg, S., Shen, C., and Forlines, C. Multimodal multiplayer tabletop gaming. Computers in Entertainment (CIE) 5, 2 (Apr. 2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Tse, E., Histon, J., Scott, S. D., and Greenberg, S. Avoiding interference: How people use spatial separation and partitioning in sdg workspaces. In Proc. of CSCW '04, ACM (2004), 252--261. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Turner, J., Alexander, J., Bulling, A., and Gellersen, H. Gaze+rst: Integrating gaze and multitouch for remote rotate-scale-translate tasks. In Proc. of CHI '15, ACM (2015), 4179--4188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Velloso, E., Wirth, M., Weichel, C., Esteves, A., and Gellersen, H. AmbiGaze: Direct Control of Ambient Devices by Gaze. In Proc. of DIS'16, ACM (2016), 812--817. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Vidal, M., Bulling, A., and Gellersen, H. Pursuits: Spontaneous interaction with displays based on smooth pursuit eye movement and moving targets. In Proc. of UbiComp '13, ACM (2013), 439--448. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Voelker, S., Matviienko, A., Schöning, J., and Borchers, J. Combining direct and indirect touch input for interactive workspaces using gaze input. In Proc. of SUI '15, ACM (2015), 79--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Voelker, S., Weiss, M., Wacharamanotham, C., and Borchers, J. Dynamic portals: A lightweight metaphor for fast object transfer on interactive surfaces. In Proc. of ITS '11, ACM (2011), 158--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Wigdor, D., Jiang, H., Forlines, C., Borkin, M., and Shen, C. Wespace: The design development and deployment of a walk-up and share multi-surface visual collaboration system. In Proc. of CHI '09, ACM (2009), 1237--1246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Yamamoto, M., Komeda, M., Nagamatsu, T., and Watanabe, T. Development of eye-tracking tabletop interface for media art works. In Proc. of ITS '10, ACM (2010), 295--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Yamamoto, M., Komeda, M., Nagamatsu, T., and Watanabe, T. Hyakunin-eyesshu: A tabletop hyakunin-isshu game with computer opponent by the action prediction based on gaze detection. In Proc. of NGCA '11, ACM (2011), 5:1--5:4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Zhai, S., Morimoto, C., and Ihde, S. Manual and gaze input cascaded (magic) pointing. In Proc. of CHI '99, ACM (1999), 246--253. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Multimodal Segmentation on a Large Interactive Tabletop: Extending Interaction on Horizontal Surfaces with Gaze

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ISS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces
      November 2016
      554 pages
      ISBN:9781450342483
      DOI:10.1145/2992154

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 November 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      ISS '16 Paper Acceptance Rate33of119submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate147of533submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader