skip to main content
10.1145/2992154.2996785acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Finding the Minimum Perceivable Size of a Tactile Element on an Ultrasonic Based Haptic Tablet

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 November 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Tactile devices with ultrasonic vibrations (based on squeeze film effect) using piezoelectric actuators are one of the existing haptic feedback technologies. In this study we have performed two psychophysical experiments on an ultrasonic haptic tablet, in order to find the minimum size of a tactile element on which all the users are able to perfectly identify different types of textures. Our results show that the spatial resolution of the tactile element on haptic touchscreen actually varies, depending on the number and types of tactile feedback information. A first experiment exhibits three different tactile textures, chosen as being easily recognized by users. We use these textures in a second experiment, and evaluate minimal spatial area on which the chosen set of textures can be recognized. Among other, we find the minimal size depends on the texture nature.

References

  1. Amberg, M., Giraud, F., Semail, B., Olivo, P., Casiez, G., and Roussel, N. Stimtac: A tactile input device with programmable friction. In UIST 2011 (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bau, O., Poupyrev, I., Israr, A., and Harrison, C. Teslatouch: Electrovibration for touch surfaces. In Proc. UIST 2010 (2010). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Casiez, G., Roussel, N., Vanbelleghem, R., and Giraud, F. Surfpad: Riding Towards Targets on a Squeeze Film Effect. In Proc. CHI '11 (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Choi, S., and Kuchenbecker, K. J. Vibrotactile display: Perception, technology, and applications. Proc. IEEE 2013 Volume 101, No. 9 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Leek, M. R. Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research. Perception & Psychophysics (2001).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Levesque, V., Oram, L., MacLean, K., Cockburn, A., Marchuk, N. D., Johnson, D., Colgate, J. E., and Peshkin, M. A. Enhancing physicality in touch interaction with programmable friction. In Proc. CHI 2011 (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Long, B., Seah, S. A., Carter, T., and Subramanian, S. Rendering volumetric haptic shapes in mid-air using ultrasound. ACM Trans. Graph. (2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Senseg. Inc. http://senseg.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Shultz, C. D., Peshkin, M. A., and Colgate, J. E. Surface haptics via electroadhesion: Expanding electrovibration with johnsen and rahbek. IEEE (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tiest, W. M. B., and Hayward, V. Inside vs. outside: Haptic perception of object size. In Proc. WHC 2015, IEEE (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Vezzoli, E., Sednaoui, T., Amberg, M., Giraud, F., and Lemaire-Semail, B. Texture rendering strategies with a high fidelity - capacitive visual-haptic friction control device. In Haptics: Perception, Devices, Control, and Applications (2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Winfield, L., Glassmire, J., Colgate, J. E., and Peshkin, M. T-pad: Tactile pattern display through variable friction reduction. IEEE (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Yi, B., Cao, X., Fjeld, M., and Zhao, S. Exploring user motivations for eyes-free interaction on mobile devices. CHI '12 (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Zhang, Y., and Harrison, C. Quantifying the targeting performance benefit of electrostatic haptic feedback on touchscreens. In Proc. ITS 2015 (2015). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Finding the Minimum Perceivable Size of a Tactile Element on an Ultrasonic Based Haptic Tablet

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ISS '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces
      November 2016
      554 pages
      ISBN:9781450342483
      DOI:10.1145/2992154

      Copyright © 2016 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 6 November 2016

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      ISS '16 Paper Acceptance Rate33of119submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate147of533submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader