skip to main content
10.1145/2993717.2993721acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesinternetwareConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multicast routing tree for sequenced packet transmission in software-defined networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 September 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Multicast denotes an idea of sending data to numbers of receivers from one source in one transmission. It has been widely applied in group communication (e.g., media streaming, multi-point video conferencing). Multicast routing tree (MRT) is usually built to keep the right paths to transmit data, where data copies are created in parent nodes and then forwarded to child nodes. However, constructing an MRT is usually difficult for a given network topology; finding an optimal multicast routing tree with the minimal cost is a proven NP-complete problem. Moreover, multicast applications usually run in local or small networks due to the limitations in flexibility, scalability, and security.

In this paper, we solve a sequenced packet transmission problem of building MRT in Software-Defined Networking (SDN). In sequenced packet transmission, nodes only send the next packet when the previous packet is received by the node on the other side of link. We found this scenario in a popular open source network simulator ns-3 when looking into the runtime behavior of OpenFlow switches simulated by ns-3. We also found this problem is not limited to the ns-3 scenario.

We prove that a routing path with less path cost does not correspond to less time cost when it is used to transmit multiple packets sequentially. We extend Dijkstra's shortest path algorithm with our new cost models. We construct the MRT as a sequenced packet shortest-path tree (SPSPT). Simulation results show that our SPSPT can save at least 10% of the multicast time for sequenced packet transmission.

References

  1. S. Agarwal, M. Kodialam, and T. Lakshman. Traffic engineering in software defined networks. In INFOCOM, 2013 Proceedings IEEE, pages 2211--2219. IEEE, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. T. Ballardie, P. Francis, and J. Crowcroft. Core based trees (CBT). In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM '93 Conference on Communications Architectures, Protocols and Applications, San Francisco, CA, USA, September 13-17, 1993, pages 85--95, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. S. Cahn. Wide area network design: concepts and tools for optimization. Morgan Kaufmann, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. T. H. Cormen. Introduction to algorithms. MIT press, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Deering, D. L. Estrin, D. Farinacci, V. Jacobson, C.-G. Liu, and L. Wei. The PIM architecture for wide-area multicast routing. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (ToN), 4(2):153--162, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. E. Deering and D. R. Cheriton. Multicast routing in datagram internetworks and extended lans. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS), 8(2):85--110, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. E. W. Dijkstra. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische mathematik, 1(1):269--271, 1959. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. L. R. Ford Jr and D. R. Fulkerson. Flows in networks. Princeton university press, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. R. Garey and D. S. Johnson. The rectilinear Steiner tree problem is NP-complete. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 32(4):826--834, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Hac. Distributed multicasting algorithm in a wide area network. In Proceedings of the 1990 ACM annual conference on Cooperation, pages 37--42. ACM, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. L.-H. Huang, H.-J. Hung, C.-C. Lin, and D.-N. Yang. Scalable and bandwidth-efficient multicast for software-defined networks. In 2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference, pages 1890--1896. IEEE, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. T.-L. Huang and D. Lee. A distributed multicast routing algorithm for real-time applications in wide area networks. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 67(5):516--530, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. F. K. Hwang, D. S. Richards, and P. Winter. The Steiner tree problem, volume 53. Elsevier, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Iyer, P. Kumar, and V. Mann. Avalanche: Data center multicast using software defined networking. In 2014 Sixth International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS), pages 1--8. IEEE, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. X. Jia. A distributed algorithm of delay-bounded multicast routing for multimedia applications in wide area networks. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), 6(6):828--837, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. L. Kou, G. Markowsky, and L. Berman. A fast algorithm for Steiner trees. Acta informatica, 15(2):141--145, 1981. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. B. Kruskal. On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the traveling salesman problem. Proceedings of the American Mathematical society, 7(1):48--50, 1956.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. R. Malli, X. Zhang, and C. Qiao. Benefits of multicasting in all-optical networks. In Photonics East (ISAM, VVDC, IEMB), pages 209--220. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. N. McKeown, T. Anderson, H. Balakrishnan, G. Parulkar, L. Peterson, J. Rexford, S. Shenker, and J. Turner. Openflow: enabling innovation in campus networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(2):69--74, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A. Medina, A. Lakhina, I. Matta, and J. W. Byers. BRITE: an approach to universal topology generation. In 9th International Workshop on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS 2001), 15-18 August 2001, Cincinnati, OH, USA, page 346, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Moy. Multicast extensions to ospf. 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. ns-3 OpenFlow switch support. https://www.nsnam.org/docs/release/3.25/models/html/openflow-switch.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. ns-3. https://www.nsnam.org/wiki/Main_Page.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Open Networking Foundation. OpenFlow Switch Specification V1.4.0, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. R. C. Prim. Shortest connection networks and some generalizations. Bell system technical journal, 36(6):1389--1401, 1957.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Software-defined networking (SDN) definition. https://www.opennetworking.org/sdn-resources/sdn-definition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. D. Waitzman, C. Partridge, and S. E. Deering. Distance vector multicast routing protocol. Technical report, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Multicast routing tree for sequenced packet transmission in software-defined networks

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            Internetware '16: Proceedings of the 8th Asia-Pacific Symposium on Internetware
            September 2016
            118 pages
            ISBN:9781450348294
            DOI:10.1145/2993717

            Copyright © 2016 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 18 September 2016

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate55of111submissions,50%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader