Luiz H. Nunes
Charith Perera
ABSTRACT
Over the last few years, the number of smart objects connected to the Internet has grown exponentially in comparison to the number of services and applications. The integration between Cloud Computing and Internet of Things, named as Cloud of Things, plays a key role in managing the connected things, their data and services. One of the main challenges in Cloud of Things is the resource discovery of the smart objects and their reuse in different contexts. Most of the existent work uses some kind of multi-criteria decision analysis algorithm to perform the resource discovery, but do not evaluate the impact that the user constraints has in the final solution. In this paper, we analyse the behaviour of the SAW, TOPSIS and VIKOR multi-objective decision analyses algorithms and the impact of user constraints on them. We evaluated the quality of the proposed solutions using the Pareto-optimality concept.
- L. Abdullah and C. R. Adawiyah. Simple additive weighting methods of multi criteria decision making and applications: A decade review. International Journal of Information Processing and Management, 5(1):39, 2014.Google Scholar
- A. Abraham and L. Jain. Evolutionary multiobjective optimization. Springer, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Behzadian, S. K. Otaghsara, M. Yazdani, and J. Ignatius. A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17):13051--13069, dec 2012. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Bovet and J. Hennebert. Distributed semantic discovery for web-of-things enabled smart buildings. In New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS), 2014 6th International Conference on, pages 1--5, March 2014.Google Scholar
- M. Caramia and P. Dell'Olmo. Multi-objective Management in Freight Logistics. Springer Science Business Media, 2008.Google Scholar
- D. Carlson and A. Schrader. Ambient ocean: A web search engine for context-aware smart resource discovery. In Internet of Things (iThings), 2014 IEEE International Conference on, and Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom), IEEE and Cyber, Physical and Social Computing(CPSCom), IEEE, pages 177--184, Sept 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Collette and P. Siarry. Multiobjective Optimization. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Deb. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester New York, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Diaz-Montes, M. AbdelBaky, M. Zou, and M. Parashar. Cometcloud: Enabling software-defined federations for end-to-end application workflows. Internet Computing, IEEE, 19(1):69--73, 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Dodgson, M. Spackman, A. Pearman, and L. Phillips. Multi-criteria analysis: a manual. Department for Communities and Local Government: London, 2009.Google Scholar
- C. Doukas and F. Antonelli. Developing and deploying end-to-end interoperable amp; discoverable iot applications. In Communications (ICC), 2015 IEEE International Conference on, pages 673--678, June 2015.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Gao, M. I. Ali, and A. Mileo. Semantic discovery and integration of urban data streams. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings, volume 1280, pages 15--30, 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gartner. Gartner says 6.4 billion connected "things" will be in use in 2016, up 30 percent from 2015. Avaliable in http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3165317, November 2015. Last access: 23/08/2015.Google Scholar
- J.-J. Huang, G.-H. Tzeng, and H.-H. Liu. A revised VIKOR model for multiple criteria decision making - the perspective of regret theory. In Communications in Computer and Information Science, pages 761--768. Springer Science Business Media, 2009.Google Scholar
- A. L. Jaimes, S. Z. Martinez, and C. A. C. Coello. An introduction to multiobjective optimization techniques. 2009.Google Scholar
- P. P. Jayaraman, K. Mitra, S. Saguna, T. Shah, D. Georgakopoulos, and R. Ranjan. Orchestrating quality of service in the cloud of things ecosystem. In 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Nanoelectronic and Information Systems, pages 185--190, Dec 2015. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Kamilaris, K. Papakonstantinou, and A. Pitsillides. Exploring the use of dns as a search engine for the web of things. In Internet of Things (WF-IoT), 2014 IEEE World Forum on, pages 100--105, March 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Khodadadi, A. V. Dastjerdi, and R. Buyya. Simurgh: A framework for effective discovery, programming, and integration of services exposed in IoT. In 2015 International Conference on Recent Advances in Internet of Things (RIoT). Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers (IEEE), apr 2015.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Kiljander, A. D'Elia, F. Morandi, P. Hyttinen, J. Takalo-Mattila, A. Ylisaukko-Oja, J.-P. Soininen, and T. Cinotti. Semantic interoperability architecture for pervasive computing and internet of things. Access, IEEE, 2:856--873, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Kothari, V. Boddula, L. Ramaswamy, and N. Abolhassani. Dqs-cloud: A data quality-aware autonomic cloud for sensor services. In Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom), 2014 International Conference on, pages 295--303, Oct 2014.Google Scholar
- K. Miettinen. Nonlinear multiobjective optimization, volume 12. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.Google Scholar
- L. H. Nunes, J. C. Estrella, L. H. V. Nakamura, R. M. D. O. Libardi, C. H. G. Ferreira, L. Jorge, C. Perera, and S. Reiff-Marganiec. A distributed sensor data search platform for internet of things environments. International Journal of Services Computing (IJSC), 4(1):1--12, 2016.Google Scholar
- L. H. Nunes, J. C. Estrella, C. Perera, S. Reiff-Marganiec, and A. N. Delbem. Multi-criteria iot resource discovery: A comparative analysis. Software: Practice and Experience, -(-):--, 2016. In print.Google Scholar
- C. Perera, A. Zaslavsky, C. Liu, M. Compton, P. Christen, and D. Georgakopoulos. Sensor search techniques for sensing as a service architecture for the internet of things. IEEE Sensors Journal, 14(2):406--420, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Perera, A. B. Zaslavsky, P. Christen, and D. Georgakopoulos. Context aware computing for the internet of things: A survey. Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol.16:414--454, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Ramezani, A. Memariani, and J. Lu. A dynamic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision support system for manager selection. In Y. Wang and T. Li, editors, Practical Applications of Intelligent Systems, volume 124 of Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, pages 265--274. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.Google Scholar
- K. Romer, B. Ostermaier, F. Mattern, M. Fahrmair, and W. Kellerer. Real-time search for real-world entities: A survey. Proceedings of the IEEE, 98(11):1887--1902, nov 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Sowe, T. Kimata, M. Dong, and K. Zettsu. Managing heterogeneous sensor data on a big data platform: Iot services for data-intensive science. In Computer Software and Applications Conference Workshops (COMPSACW), 2014 IEEE 38th International, pages 295--300, July 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W.-H. Tsai, W. Hsu, and W.-C. Chou. A gap analysis model for improving airport service quality. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22(10):1025--1040, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Tzeng and J. Huang. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. A Chapman & Hall book. Taylor & Francis, 2011.Google Scholar
- L. Xu and J.-B. Yang. Introduction to multi-criteria decision making and the evidential reasoning approach. 2001.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Multi-criteria IoT resource discovery: a comparative analysis
The growth of real-world objects with embedded and globally networked sensors allows to consolidate the Internet of things paradigm and increase the number of applications in the domains of ubiquitous and context-aware computing. The merging between ...
Resource discovery in the Internet of Things integrated with fog computing using Markov learning model
AbstractDue to high and unpredictable connection delays, privacy gaps, and traffic load of networks connecting cloud computing to end users in many of the Internet of Things (IoT)-based services, some challenges have been created in cloud computing ...
Cloud of Things Modeling for Efficient and Coordinated Resources Provisioning
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2017 ConferencesAbstractThe shift towards the Cloud of Things (CoT) requires a seamless integration of Cloud Computing and the Internet of Things (IoT). Such transition promotes a holistic approach for managing and orchestrating cloud and IoT infrastructures. However, ...
Comments