ABSTRACT
This paper proposes a taxonomy of autonomous vehicle handover situations with a particular emphasis on situational awareness. It focuses on a number of research challenges such as: legal responsibility, the situational awareness level of the driver and the vehicle, the knowledge the vehicle must have of the driver's driving skills as well as the in-vehicle context. The taxonomy acts as a starting point for researchers and practitioners to frame the discussion on this complex problem.
- Pavlo Bazilinskyy and Joost de Winter. 2015. Auditory interfaces in automated driving: an international survey. PeerJournal of Computer Science 1: e13. http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.13 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Durand R. Begault. 1993. Head-Up Auditory Displays for Traffic Collision Avoidance System Advisories: A Preliminary Investigation. Human Factors 35, 4: 707--717. http://doi.org/10.1177/001872089303500409Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel Damböck, Thomas Weißgerber, Martin Kienle, and Klaus Bengler. 2015. Evaluation of a contact analogue head-up display for highly automated driving. 4th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. San Francsico. USAGoogle Scholar
- M.R. Endsley. 1988. Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, 789--795. http://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.1988.195097 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christian Gold, Daniel Damböck, L. Lorenz, and K. Bengler. 2013. "Take over!" How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 57, 1: 1938--1942. http://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571433 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lee Gomes. 2016. When Will Google ' s Self-Driving Car Really Be Ready? Three Super-Cool Technologies. IEEE Spectrum 53, 13--14. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leo J. Gugerty. 1997. Situation awareness during driving: Explicit and implicit knowledge in dynamic spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 3, 1: 42--66. http://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.3.1.42 Google ScholarCross Ref
- D Kern and A Schmidt. 2009. Design space for driver-based automotive user interfaces. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 3--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John S Kerr. 1991. Driving without attention mode (DWAM): A formalisation of inattentive states in driving. In Vision in Vehicles -- III. 473--479.Google Scholar
- Sven Krome, William Goddard, Stefan Greuter, Steffen P. Walz, and Ansgar Gerlicher. 2015. A context-based design process for future use cases of autonomous driving. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI '15, ACM Press, 265--272. http://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799257 Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Lorenz, P. Kerschbaum, and J. Schumann. 2014. Designing take over scenarios for automated driving: How does augmented reality support the driver to get back into the loop? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 58, 1: 1681--1685. http://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581351 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ruiqi Ma and David B. Kaber. 2005. Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a cell phone. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35, 10: 939--953. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2005.04.002 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard A. Marottoli and Emily D. Richardson. 1998. Confidence in, and self-rating of, driving ability among older drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention 30, 3: 331--336. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00100-0 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shawn C Marshall, Keith G Wilson, Frank J Molnar, Malcolm Man-Son-Hing, Ian Stiell, and Michelle M Porter. 2007. Measurement of driving patterns of older adults using data logging devices with and without global positioning system capability. Traffic injury prevention 8, 3: 260--266. http://doi.org/10.1080/15389580701281792Google Scholar
- Micheal L Matthews, David J Bryant, Robert D G Webb, and Joanne L Harbluk. 2001. Model for Situation Awareness and Driving: Application to Analysis and Research for Intelligent Transportation Systems. Transportation Research Record 1779, 26--32.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard E. Mayer. 2005. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Camburdge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1075/idj.16.1.13pel Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexander Meschtscherjakov, Manfred Tscheligi, Dalila Szostak, et al. Workshop on User Experience of Autonomous Driving. Adjunct Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI'13): 71--73.Google Scholar
- Josef Nilsson, Paolo Falcone, and Jonny Vinter. 2014. Safe Transitions From Automated to Manual Driving Using Driver Controllability Estimation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 16, 4: 1806--1816. http://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2376877 Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Parasuraman, T.B. Sheridan, and C.D. Wickens. 2000. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 30, 3: 286--297. http://doi.org/10.1109/3468.844354 Google ScholarDigital Library
- William Payre, Julien Cestac, and Patricia Delhomme. 2014. Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 27, PB: 252--263. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.009Google Scholar
- Ioannis Politis, Stephen Brewster, and Frank Pollick. 2015. Language-based multimodal displays for the handover of control in autonomous cars. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '15): 3--10. http://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799262 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael I. Posner. 1973. Cognition: An Introduction. Oxford.Google Scholar
- Matt Richtel and Conor Dougherty. 2015. Google's Driverless Cars Run Into Problem: Cars With Drivers. The New York Times. https://goo.gl/UiHakx (retrieved: 12-10-2016)Google Scholar
- Rosengren. 1995. Driver assistance and cooperative driving. ERTICO, First World Congress on Advanced Transport Telematics and Intelligent Vehilce Highway Systems: 1613--22.Google Scholar
- N B Sarter, D D Woods, and C E Billings. 1997. Automation Surprises. In, Handbook of Human Factors & Ergonomics. G Salvendy (Ed.). Wiley.Google Scholar
- Siraj Shaikh and Padmanabhan Krishnan. 2012. A Framework for Analysing Driver Interactions with Semi-Autonomous Vehicles. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 105: 85--99. http://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.105.7 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Neville A. Stanton and Philip Marsden. 1996. From fly-by-wire to drive-by-wire: Safety implications of automation in vehicles. Safety Science 24, 1: 35--49. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(96)00067-7 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Niklas Strand, Josef Nilsson, I. C MariAnne Karlsson, and Lena Nilsson. 2014. Semi-automated versus highly automated driving in critical situations caused by automation failures. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 27, PB: 218--228. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.005Google Scholar
- Anna Sundström. 2008. Self-assessment of driving skill - A review from a measurement perspective. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 11, 1: 1--9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2007.05.002 Google ScholarCross Ref
- M Tonnis, C Sandor, G Klinker, C Lange, and H Bubb. 2005. Experimental evaluation of an augmented reality visualization for directing a car driver's attention. Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2005. Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE and ACM International Symposium on, 56--59. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marcel Walch, Kristin Lange, Martin Baumann, and Michael Weber. 2015. Autonomous Driving: investigating the feasibility of car-driver handover assistance. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI'15): 11--18. http://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799268 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guy H. Walker, Neville A. Stanton, Tara A. Kazi, Paul M. Salmon, and Daniel P. Jenkins. 2009. Does advanced driver training improve situational awareness? Applied Ergonomics 40, 4: 678--687. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.06.002 Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nicholas J. Ward. 2000. Automation of task processes: An example of intelligent transportation systems. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 10, 4: 395--408. http://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6564(200023)10:4<395::AID-HFM3>3.0.CO;2-3 Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. L. Wiener and R. E. Curry. 1980. Flight-deck automation: promises and problems. Ergonomics 23, 10: 995--1011. http://doi.org/10.1080/00140138008924809 Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Towards A Taxonomy of Autonomous Vehicle Handover Situations
Recommendations
Priming Drivers before Handover in Semi-Autonomous Cars
CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSemi-autonomous vehicles occasionally require control to be handed over to the driver in situations where the vehicle is unable to operate safely. Currently, such handover requests require the driver to take control almost instantaneously. We ...
Motion planning of autonomous vehicles in a non-autonomous vehicle environment without speed lanes
Planning is one of the key problems for autonomous vehicles operating in road scenarios. Present planning algorithms operate with the assumption that traffic is organised in predefined speed lanes, which makes it impossible to allow autonomous vehicles ...
Autonomous Driving: Investigating the Feasibility of Bimodal Take-Over Requests
Autonomous vehicles will need de-escalation strategies to compensate when reaching system limitations. Car-driver handovers can be considered one possible method to deal with system boundaries. The authors suggest a bimodal auditory and visual handover ...
Comments