skip to main content
10.1145/3003715.3005456acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Towards A Taxonomy of Autonomous Vehicle Handover Situations

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper proposes a taxonomy of autonomous vehicle handover situations with a particular emphasis on situational awareness. It focuses on a number of research challenges such as: legal responsibility, the situational awareness level of the driver and the vehicle, the knowledge the vehicle must have of the driver's driving skills as well as the in-vehicle context. The taxonomy acts as a starting point for researchers and practitioners to frame the discussion on this complex problem.

References

  1. Pavlo Bazilinskyy and Joost de Winter. 2015. Auditory interfaces in automated driving: an international survey. PeerJournal of Computer Science 1: e13. http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.13 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Durand R. Begault. 1993. Head-Up Auditory Displays for Traffic Collision Avoidance System Advisories: A Preliminary Investigation. Human Factors 35, 4: 707--717. http://doi.org/10.1177/001872089303500409Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Daniel Damböck, Thomas Weißgerber, Martin Kienle, and Klaus Bengler. 2015. Evaluation of a contact analogue head-up display for highly automated driving. 4th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. San Francsico. USAGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M.R. Endsley. 1988. Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, 789--795. http://doi.org/10.1109/NAECON.1988.195097 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Christian Gold, Daniel Damböck, L. Lorenz, and K. Bengler. 2013. "Take over!" How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 57, 1: 1938--1942. http://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571433 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Lee Gomes. 2016. When Will Google ' s Self-Driving Car Really Be Ready? Three Super-Cool Technologies. IEEE Spectrum 53, 13--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Leo J. Gugerty. 1997. Situation awareness during driving: Explicit and implicit knowledge in dynamic spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 3, 1: 42--66. http://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.3.1.42 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. D Kern and A Schmidt. 2009. Design space for driver-based automotive user interfaces. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 3--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. John S Kerr. 1991. Driving without attention mode (DWAM): A formalisation of inattentive states in driving. In Vision in Vehicles -- III. 473--479.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sven Krome, William Goddard, Stefan Greuter, Steffen P. Walz, and Ansgar Gerlicher. 2015. A context-based design process for future use cases of autonomous driving. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI '15, ACM Press, 265--272. http://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799257 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. L. Lorenz, P. Kerschbaum, and J. Schumann. 2014. Designing take over scenarios for automated driving: How does augmented reality support the driver to get back into the loop? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 58, 1: 1681--1685. http://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581351 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ruiqi Ma and David B. Kaber. 2005. Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a cell phone. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35, 10: 939--953. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2005.04.002 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Richard A. Marottoli and Emily D. Richardson. 1998. Confidence in, and self-rating of, driving ability among older drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention 30, 3: 331--336. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00100-0 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Shawn C Marshall, Keith G Wilson, Frank J Molnar, Malcolm Man-Son-Hing, Ian Stiell, and Michelle M Porter. 2007. Measurement of driving patterns of older adults using data logging devices with and without global positioning system capability. Traffic injury prevention 8, 3: 260--266. http://doi.org/10.1080/15389580701281792Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Micheal L Matthews, David J Bryant, Robert D G Webb, and Joanne L Harbluk. 2001. Model for Situation Awareness and Driving: Application to Analysis and Research for Intelligent Transportation Systems. Transportation Research Record 1779, 26--32.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Richard E. Mayer. 2005. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Camburdge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1075/idj.16.1.13pel Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Alexander Meschtscherjakov, Manfred Tscheligi, Dalila Szostak, et al. Workshop on User Experience of Autonomous Driving. Adjunct Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI'13): 71--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Josef Nilsson, Paolo Falcone, and Jonny Vinter. 2014. Safe Transitions From Automated to Manual Driving Using Driver Controllability Estimation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 16, 4: 1806--1816. http://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2376877 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. R. Parasuraman, T.B. Sheridan, and C.D. Wickens. 2000. A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 30, 3: 286--297. http://doi.org/10.1109/3468.844354 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. William Payre, Julien Cestac, and Patricia Delhomme. 2014. Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 27, PB: 252--263. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.009Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ioannis Politis, Stephen Brewster, and Frank Pollick. 2015. Language-based multimodal displays for the handover of control in autonomous cars. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '15): 3--10. http://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799262 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Michael I. Posner. 1973. Cognition: An Introduction. Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Matt Richtel and Conor Dougherty. 2015. Google's Driverless Cars Run Into Problem: Cars With Drivers. The New York Times. https://goo.gl/UiHakx (retrieved: 12-10-2016)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosengren. 1995. Driver assistance and cooperative driving. ERTICO, First World Congress on Advanced Transport Telematics and Intelligent Vehilce Highway Systems: 1613--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. N B Sarter, D D Woods, and C E Billings. 1997. Automation Surprises. In, Handbook of Human Factors & Ergonomics. G Salvendy (Ed.). Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Siraj Shaikh and Padmanabhan Krishnan. 2012. A Framework for Analysing Driver Interactions with Semi-Autonomous Vehicles. Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 105: 85--99. http://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.105.7 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Neville A. Stanton and Philip Marsden. 1996. From fly-by-wire to drive-by-wire: Safety implications of automation in vehicles. Safety Science 24, 1: 35--49. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(96)00067-7 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Niklas Strand, Josef Nilsson, I. C MariAnne Karlsson, and Lena Nilsson. 2014. Semi-automated versus highly automated driving in critical situations caused by automation failures. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 27, PB: 218--228. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.005Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Anna Sundström. 2008. Self-assessment of driving skill - A review from a measurement perspective. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 11, 1: 1--9. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2007.05.002 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. M Tonnis, C Sandor, G Klinker, C Lange, and H Bubb. 2005. Experimental evaluation of an augmented reality visualization for directing a car driver's attention. Mixed and Augmented Reality, 2005. Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE and ACM International Symposium on, 56--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Marcel Walch, Kristin Lange, Martin Baumann, and Michael Weber. 2015. Autonomous Driving: investigating the feasibility of car-driver handover assistance. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI'15): 11--18. http://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799268 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Guy H. Walker, Neville A. Stanton, Tara A. Kazi, Paul M. Salmon, and Daniel P. Jenkins. 2009. Does advanced driver training improve situational awareness? Applied Ergonomics 40, 4: 678--687. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2008.06.002 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Nicholas J. Ward. 2000. Automation of task processes: An example of intelligent transportation systems. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing 10, 4: 395--408. http://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6564(200023)10:4<395::AID-HFM3>3.0.CO;2-3 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. E. L. Wiener and R. E. Curry. 1980. Flight-deck automation: promises and problems. Ergonomics 23, 10: 995--1011. http://doi.org/10.1080/00140138008924809 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Towards A Taxonomy of Autonomous Vehicle Handover Situations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      Automotive'UI 16: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
      October 2016
      296 pages
      ISBN:9781450345330
      DOI:10.1145/3003715

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 October 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Automotive'UI 16 Paper Acceptance Rate39of85submissions,46%Overall Acceptance Rate248of566submissions,44%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader