skip to main content
10.1145/3007120.3007147acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

A General mHealth Design Pipeline

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 November 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

The use of smartphones technologies and apps in health has become increasing popular in recent years and as such has led to the development of the mobile health (mHealth) sector. However, mobile health applications (apps) are often rejected in app stores or not utilised by the intended audience. This has led to much discussion about the review processes, certification, and considerations required to develop a mHealth app for successful deployment. In this paper, we describe a general design pipeline to be used for the creation of mHealth apps. The pipeline considers and makes recommendations for the design of the following in a mHealth app: Preparation, Back-End Development, Front-End Development and Deployment.

References

  1. WHO. Building Foundations for eHealth, Progress of the Member States, Report of the WHO Global Observatory for eHealth. WHO, Switzerland, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Phillips G, Felix L, Galli L, Patel V, Edwards P. The effectiveness of M-health technologies for improving health and health services: a systematic review protocol. BMC Research Notes, BMC research notes, 3(1), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Research2Guidance. 500m people will be using healthcare mobile applications in 2015. Retreived July 14, 2016, from Research2Guidance.com: http://research2guidance.com/2010/11/10/500m-people-will-be-using-healthcare-mobile-applications-in-2015-2/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Research2Guidance. The State of the Art of mHealth App Publishing. In mHealth App Developer Economics. 2014. May.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Manhattan Research, The Doctor's Digital Path to Treatment. Retrieved July 14, 2016, from Google Physician Channel Adoption Studyt: https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/research-studies/the-doctors-digital-path-to-treatment.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Monney, G., Penzenstadler, L., Dupraz, O., Etter, J. F., & Khazaal, Y. mHealth App for Cannabis Users: Satisfaction and Perceived Usefulness. Frontiers in psychiatry 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Eriksén, S., Georgsson, M., Hofflander, M., Nilsson, L., & Lundberg, J. Health in hand: Putting mHealth design in context. In Usability and Accessibility Focused Requirements Engineering (UsARE). (Karlskrona, Sweden, 2014) IEEE, 36--39.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sunyaev, A., Dehling, T., Taylor, P. L., & Mandl, K. D. Availability and quality of mobile health app privacy policies. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association amiajnl-2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. European Commission. COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe - Analysis and Evidence. Belgium. 2015 MayGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission. COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Belgium. 2014 MayGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. European Commission. GREEN PAPER. On mobile Health ("mHealth"). Belgium. 2014 AprilGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. European Commission. ARTICLE 29 DATA PROTECTION WORKING PARTY. Belgium. 2013 FebruaryGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Food And Drug Administration. Mobile Medical Applications. Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. USA. 2015 FebruaryGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. PwC. How supportive is the regulatory framework for mobile health applications? mHealthinsights. 2013 JanuaryGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Buijink, A. W., Benjamin Jelle Visser, and Louise Marshall. "Medical apps for smartphones: lack of evidence undermines quality and safety." Evid Based Med 18.3 (2013): 90--2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. WHO. eHealth Tools and Services, Needs of the Member States, Report of the WHO GLobal Observatory on eHealth. WHO, Switzerland, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Alnanih, R., Ormandjieva, O., Radhakrishnan, T. Context-based and Rule-based Adaptation of Mobile User Interfaces in mHealth. Procedia Computer Science 21 (Ontario, Canada, 2013) 390--397.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sorber, J., Shin, M., Peterson, R., Cornelius, C., Mare, S., Prasad, A., Marois, Z., Smithayer, E. Kotz, D. An amulet for trustworthy wearable mHealth. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems & Applications (California, USA, 2012) ACM, 7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D'Alessandro, D. M., Kingsley, P., & Johnson-West, J. The readability of pediatric patient education materials on the World Wide Web. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine 155(7) 807--812.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Sundin, P. Jonathan, C. Khanjan, M. Why do entrepreneurial mHealth ventures in the developing world fail to scale? Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology. 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Eckman, M. Irena, G. Khanjan, M. Leveraging design thinking to build sustainable mobile health systems. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology. 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Malkin, R.A. Design of health care technologies for the developing world. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 9. 567--587.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Estrin, D., Ida, S. Open mHealth architecture: an engine for health care innovation. Science 330(6005). 759--760Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Aldridge, M.D. Writing and designing readable patient education materials. Nephrology Nursing Journal 31(4) 373--377.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. iMedicalApps. 2015. Top Apps for Patient. Retreived July 14, 2016 from imedicalapps.com: http://www.imedicalapps.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. mHealthNews 2014. Who is best suited to validate mHealth apps? Retreived July 14, 2016, from imedicalapps.com: http://www.imedicalapps.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. A General mHealth Design Pipeline

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MoMM '16: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multi Media
      November 2016
      363 pages

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 November 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader