Laura Icela González Pérez
Francisco J. García-Peñalvo
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this paper is to show a PhD dissertation research plan, which aims to assess whether the users' experience of users to perform various tasks in an open access repository, increases by integrating Discovery Tools. The tasks to perform by the users are management and information design, dissemination and searches of open educational resources (OER) of sustainability energy. This research aims to develop a usability evaluation prototype which will offer new insights in the design of the information architecture. In the first stage, the criteria will be selected to measure the level of usability of the tasks to evaluate and develop the analysis of the current interactive design of the web repository. In the second stage, will consist of measure, once implemented the Discovery Tools in the web repository and check the usability level increase in relation with the criteria. In this paper you could find aspects as the motivations and the context in which it will develop this research, state of the art, hypothesis, research objectives, aspects of the methodology of the research, developed under the method of mixed layout, the current an expected contribution, the results and the validation and dissertation status. The results will contribute for detect new criteria and parameters for provide flexible interfaces, specifically for the web repositories, which are a part of the technological ecosystem of the scientific activity.
- Albert, W., & Tullis, T. 2013. Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Newnes. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Alvite, M. 2012. Redefiniendo el catálogo: Expectativas de las interfaces de descubrimiento centradas en el usuario. Investigación bibliotecológica, 26(56), 181--204Google Scholar
- Ávila, L., Ortiz, V., & Rodríguez, D. 2015. Herramientas de descubrimiento: ¿una ventanilla única? Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 38(1), e077.Google Scholar
- Chickering, F. W., & Yang, S. Q. 2014. Evaluation and comparison of discovery tools: An update. Information Technology and Libraries (Online), 33(2), 5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología. 2015. Convocatoria CONACYT --- Secretaría de Energía --- Sustentabilidad Energética 2015 -- 2016. Formación de recursos humanos especializados en materia de sustentabilidad energética.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J.W. 2015. A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J.W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Diario Oficial de la Federación. 2014. Decreto por el que se reforman y adicionan diversas disposiciones de la Ley de Ciencia y Tecnología, de la Ley General de Educación y de la Ley Orgánica del Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología.Google Scholar
- Fagan, J. C., Mandernach, M. A., Nelson, C. S., Paulo, J. R., & Saunders, G. 2012. Usability test results for a discovery tool in an academic library. Information technology and libraries, 31(1), 83--112.Google Scholar
- Fernández, A., Insfran, E., & Abrahão, S. (2011). Usability evaluation methods for the web: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 53, 789--817 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fidalgo-Blanco, Á., García-Peñalvo, F. & Sein-Echaluce, M. 2016. From massive access to cooperation: Lessons learned and proven results of a hybrid xMOOC/cMOOC pedagogical approach to MOOCs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education (ETHE), 13(24).Google Scholar
- Fidalgo Blanco, Á., García-Peñalvo, F., & Sein-Echaluce Lacleta, M. 2014. Tendencias en los MOOCs. Retrieved from http://gredos.usal.es/jspui/handle/10366/125093Google Scholar
- García-Peñalvo, F. 2015. Percepciones estratégicas de la Innovación Educativa. Trabajo presentado en el 45 Congreso de Investigación y Desarrollo. Monterrey, México.Google Scholar
- García-Peñalvo, F., Martínez Abad, F., & Rodríguez Conde, M. J. 2014. Evaluación del impacto del término "MOOC" vs "eLearning" en la literatura científica y de divulgación. Profesorado. Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 18(1), 185--201.Google Scholar
- García-Peñalvo, F., García de Figuerola, C., & Merlo, J. 2010. Open knowledge: Challenges and facts. Online Information Review, 34(4), 520--539.Google ScholarCross Ref
- García, R., Botella, F., & Marcos, M. C. 2010. Hacia la arquitectura de la información 3.0: pasado, presente y futuro. El profesional de la información, 19(4), 339--347.Google Scholar
- Glasserman M., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. 2015. Formación de investigadores educativos mediante el diseño de recursos educativos abiertos. Revista de Investigación Educativa de la Escuela de Graduados en Educación, 10(5), 36--42.Google Scholar
- Garrett, J. J. 2010. Elements of user experience, the: user-centered design for the web and beyond. Pearson Education. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hassan Montero, &., & Martín Fernández, F. 2004. Propuesta de adaptación de la metodología de diseño centrado en el usuario para el desarrollo de sitios web accesibles. Revista española de Documentación Científica, 27(3), 330--344.Google Scholar
- Hollingsed T. & Novick, D. 2007. "Usability inspection methods after 15 years of research and practice". Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication, 249--255. Google ScholarDigital Library
- International Standard ISO 9241-11:1998. 1998. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs). Part 11: Guidance on usability.Google Scholar
- Kalbach, J. 2007. Designing web navigation. O'Reilly Media, Inc. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Melero, R., Abadal, E., Abad, F., & Villarroya, A. 2015. Políticas institucionales para el fomento del acceso abierto: tipología y buenas prácticas. Bollettino AIB, 49(2) 159--170.Google Scholar
- Merlo, J., Fernández, A., Ferreras, T., & Torre-Marín R. 2015. Repositorios e integración de contenidos en herramientas de descubrimiento: la experiencia de la Universidad de Salamanca en Worldcat. Trabajo presentado en las VI Jornadas de OS-Repositorios / XIV Workshop de REBIUN. Córdoba, España.Google Scholar
- Molich, R., & Nielsen, J. 1990. Improving a human-computer dialogue. Communications of the ACM 33(3), 338--348 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morales, E., Gómez-Aguilar, D., & García-Peñalvo, F. 2008. HEODAR: Herramienta para la Evaluación de Objetos Didácticos de Aprendizaje Reutilizables. In J. Á. Velázquez-Iturbide, F. J. García-Peñalvo, & A. B. Gil (Eds.), Actas del X Simposio Internacional de Informática Educativa - SIIE'08 Salamanca, España: Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
- Onwuegbuzie J. & Leech, L. 2006. Linking Research Questions to Mixed Methods Data Analysis Procedures. Qual Report; 11(3), 474--498. Recuperado de http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR11-3/onwuegbuzie.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Páez, A. H. 2016. Procedimiento de arquitectura de Información para los entornos de Realidad Virtual con fines educativos. Serie Científica-Universidad de las Ciencias Informáticas, 9(4).Google Scholar
- Perurena, L., & Moráguez, M. 2013. Usabilidad de los sitios Web, los métodos y las técnicas para la evaluación. Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud, 24(2), 176--194.Google Scholar
- Polson, P. G., Lewis, C., Rieman, J., & Wharton, C. 1992. Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of man-machine studies, 36(5), 741--773. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. 2015. Acceso abierto y su repercusión en la Sociedad del Conocimiento: Reflexiones de casos prácticos en Latinoamérica. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 16(1), 103--118.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ramírez-Montoya M. S., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. 2015. Movimiento Educativo Abierto. Virtualis, 6(12), 1--13.Google Scholar
- UNESCO. 2012. 2012 Paris OER Declaration. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/Events/Paris%20OER%20Declaration_01.pdfGoogle Scholar
Index Terms
- Open access to educational resources in energy and sustainability: usability evaluation prototype for repositories
Recommendations
Discovery tools for open access repositories: a literature mapping
TEEM '16: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing MulticulturalityThis paper describes the development of a systematic literature mapping approach that was used to identify and categorize current global studies wherein librarians utilized updated methodologies to select and implement Discovery Tools within Online ...
Usability evaluation focused on user experience of repositories related to energy sustainability: A Literature Mapping
TEEM 2017: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing MulticulturalityThis paper presents a systematic literature mapping about two types of studies about interaction using repositories energy sustainability, (1) studies related to users' experience, and (2) studies about usability evaluation, to add 78 studies in this ...
Open Educational Resources: Inquiring into Author Reuse Behaviors
EC-TEL '08: Proceedings of the 3rd European conference on Technology Enhanced Learning: Times of Convergence: Technologies Across Learning ContextsFor teachers and learners, the proliferation of open educational resources (OER) in combination with advances in information technologies has meant centralized access to materials and the possibility of creating, using, and reusing OER globally, ...
Comments