skip to main content
10.1145/3025453.3025731acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Ubiquitous Accessibility for People with Visual Impairments: Are We There Yet?

Published:02 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ubiquitous access is an increasingly common vision of computing, wherein users can interact with any computing device or service from anywhere, at any time. In the era of personal computing, users with visual impairments required special-purpose, assistive technologies, such as screen readers, to interact with computers. This paper investigates whether technologies like screen readers have kept pace with, or have created a barrier to, the trend toward ubiquitous access, with a specific focus on desktop computing as this is still the primary way computers are used in education and employment. Towards that, the paper presents a user study with 21 visually-impaired participants, specifically involving the switching of screen readers within and across different computing platforms, and the use of screen readers in remote access scenarios. Among the findings, the study shows that, even for remote desktop access - an early forerunner of true ubiquitous access - screen readers are too limited, if not unusable. The study also identifies several accessibility needs, such as uniformity of navigational experience across devices, and recommends potential solutions. In summary, assistive technologies have not made the jump into the era of ubiquitous access, and multiple, inconsistent screen readers create new practical problems for users with visual impairments.

References

  1. System Access. Available from: http://www.serotek.com/systemaccess.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. GNOME Accessibility Architecture (ATK and AT-SPI). Available from: https://developer.gnome.org/accessibility-devel-guide/stable/dev-start-5.html.en.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Introducing ChromeVox. Available from: http://www.chromevox.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. JAWS Tandem. Available from: http://www.freedomscientific.com/JAWSHq/JAWSTandemQuickStart.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. LightHouse GUILD, Available from: http://www.lighthouseguild.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. NVDA Remote brings free remote access to the blind. Available from: http://nvdaremote.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. OASIS User Interface Markup Language (UIML). Available from: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/uiml/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Julio Abascal, Amaia Aizpurua, Idoia Cearreta, Borja Gamecho, Nestor Garay-Vitoria, Raúl Miñón. 201 Automatically generating tailored accessible user interfaces for ubiquitous services The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, ACM, Dundee, Scotland, UK, 187--194. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Tousif Ahmed, Roberto Hoyle, Kay Connelly, David Crandall and Apu Kapadia. 2015. Privacy Concerns and Behaviors of People with Visual Impairments Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 3523--3532. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Apple. NSAccessibility. Available from: https://developer.apple.com/reference/appkit/nsaccessibility.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Matthew Tylee Atkinson, Matthew J. Bell and Colin H. C. Machin. 2012. Towards ubiquitous accessibility: capability-based profiles and adaptations, delivered via the semantic web Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, ACM, Lyon, France, 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jeffrey P. Bigham, Craig M. Prince and Richard E. Ladner. 2008. WebAnywhere: a screen reader on-the-go Proceedings of the 2008 international cross-disciplinary conference on Web accessibility (W4A), ACM, Beijing, China, 73--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Syed Masum Billah, Donald E. Porter and I. V. Ramakrishnan. 2016. Sinter: Low-bandwidth Remote Access for the Visually-impaired. in Proceedings of the Eleventh European Conference on Computer Systems, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 27:21--27:16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Alan Bryman, Bob Burgess and others. 2002. Analyzing qualitative data. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Rocío Calvo, Ana Iglesias and Lourdes Moreno. 2013. Accessibility barriers for users of screen readers in the Moodle learning content management system. Universal Access in the Information Society, 13 (3). 315--327. 10.1007/s10209-013-0314-3 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Morgan Dixon, Daniel Leventhal and James Fogarty. 2011. Content and Hierarchy in Pixel-based Methods for Reverse Engineering Interface Structure. in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 969--978. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Dolphin. SuperNova Screen Reader, Available from: http://www.yourdolphin.com/productdetail.asp?id=1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Josefina Guerrero-Garcia, Juan Manuel Gonzalez-Calleros, Jean Vanderdonckt and Jaime Munoz-Arteaga. 2009. A Theoretical Survey of User Interface Description Languages: Preliminary Results Proceedings of the 2009 Latin American Web Congress (la-web 2009), IEEE Computer Society, 36--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kip Harris. 2006. Challenges and solutions for screen reader/I.T. interoperability. SIGACCESS Access. Comput. (85). 10--20. 10.1145/1166118.1166120 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Michael Heron, Vicki L. Hanson and Ian W. Ricketts. 2013. ACCESS: a technical framework for adaptive accessibility support Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGCHI symposium on Engineering interactive computing systems, ACM, London, United Kingdom, 33--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. GW Micro, Window-Eyes. Available from: http://http//www.gwmicro.com/Window-Eyes/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Microsoft. Microsoft Active Accessibility: Architecture. Available from: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dd373592(v=vs.85).aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Microsoft. UI Automation Overview. Available from: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms747327.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Meredith Ringel Morris, Annuska Zolyomi, Catherine Yao, Sina Bahram, Jeffrey P. Bigham and Shaun K. Kane. 2016. "With Most of It Being Pictures Now, I Rarely Use It": Understanding Twitter's Evolving Accessibility to Blind Users. in Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 5506--5516. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. NVAccess. NV Access: Home of the free NVDA Screen Reader. Available from: http://www.nvaccess.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kyle Rector, Lauren Milne, Richard E. Ladner, Batya Friedman and Julie A. Kientz. 2015. Exploring the Opportunities and Challenges with Exercise Technologies for People who are Blind or Low-Vision. Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility, ACM, Lisbon, Portugal, 203--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Freedom Scientific. JAWS Screen Reader. Available from: http://www.freedomscientific.com/downloads/jaws.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kristen Shinohara and Josh Tenenberg. 2007. Observing Sara: a case study of a blind person's interactions with technology Proceedings of the 9th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, ACM, Tempe, Arizona, USA, 171--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Joãa Tavares, Jorge Barbosa, Cristiano Costa, Adenauer Yamin and Rodrigo Real. 2012. Hefestos: A Model for Ubiquitous Accessibility Support. in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, New York, NY, USA, ACM, 27:21--27:28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Gregg C. Vanderheiden. 2008. Ubiquitous Accessibility, Common Technology Core, and Micro Assistive Technology. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 1 (2). 1--7. 10.1145/1408760.1408764 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Violeta Voykinska, Shiri Azenkot, Shaomei Wu and Gilly Leshed. 2016. How Blind People Interact with Visual Content on Social Networking Services. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, ACM, San Francisco, California, USA, 1584--1595. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Brian Wentz, Harry Hochheiser and Jonathan Lazar. 2013. A survey of blind users on the usability of email applications. Univers. Access Inf. Soc., 12 (3). 327--336. 10.1007/s10209-012-0285-9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Thomas Hahn, Hidayat Ur Rahman, Richard Segall, Christoph Heim, Raphaela Brunson, Ankush Sharma, Maryam Aslam, Ana Lara-Rodriguez, Md. Sahidul Islam, Neha Gupta, Charles S. Embry, Patrick Grossmann, Shahrukh Babar, Gregory A. Skibinski, and Fusheng Tang. 2016. Remote Access Programs to Better Integrate Individuals with Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 245--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Visiongain, "The Cloud-Based Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) Market 2013--2023." Available from: https://www.visiongain.com/Report/1160/The-Cloud-Based-Virtual-Desktop-Infrastructure-(VDI)-Market-2013-2023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Network Emulator Toolkit. Available from: https://blog.mrpol.nl/2010/01/14/network-emulator-toolkit/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Ubiquitous Accessibility for People with Visual Impairments: Are We There Yet?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2017
        7138 pages
        ISBN:9781450346559
        DOI:10.1145/3025453

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 May 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '17 Paper Acceptance Rate600of2,400submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader