skip to main content
10.1145/3033701.3033752acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesihcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Evaluation of Spotify: an evaluation textual experience using the Maltu methodology

Published:04 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a textual evaluation experience in Usability and User eXperience of Spotify application. The methodology used for the textual evaluation was MALTU. In this study, we collected 100 users' postings from a popular website (Reclame Aqui) and 7 participants classified postings and discussed their impressions about this form of evaluation.

References

  1. Fetter, M.; Gross, T.; Schirmer, M.. CAESSA: Visual Authoring of ContextAware Experience Sampling Studies. In Proceedings of CHI 2011, 2341--2346 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Korhonen, H.; Arrasvuori, J.; Väänänen-vainio-mattila, K.. Let users tell the story. In Proceedings of CHI 2010, 4051--4056. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mendes, M.. MALTU -- Um modelo para avaliação da interação em sistemas sociais a partir da linguagem textual do usuário. Tese (doutorado). Universidade Federal do Ceará, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Computação, Fortaleza, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mendes, M.; Furtado, E.; Furtado, V.; Castro, M.. How do users express their emotions regarding the social system in use? A classification of their postings by using the emotional analysis of Norman. In HCI International, 2014, 229--241. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Obrist, M.; Roto, V.; Väänänen-vainio-mattila, K.. User Experience Evaluation -- Do You Know Which Method to Use? CHI 2009, 2763--2766. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Olsson, T.; Salo, M. Narratives of satisfying and unsatisfying experiences of current mobile augmented reality applications. CHI 2012, 2779--2788 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Reclame Aqui Institucional. Acessado em 19 de junho de 2016. Disponível em http://www.reclameaqui.com.br/institucional.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Spotify. Acessado em 19 de junho de 2016. Disponível em http://thenextweb.com/opinion/2016/06/02/spotify-has-a-plan-to-make-money-but-its-still-no-match-for-apple-and-google.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Tuch, A. N., Trusell, R. N., and Hornbæk, K.: Analyzing Users' Narratives to Understand Experience with Interactive Products. In Proceedings of CHI 2013, 2079--2088. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Evaluation of Spotify: an evaluation textual experience using the Maltu methodology

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IHC '16: Proceedings of the 15th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      October 2016
      431 pages
      ISBN:9781450352352
      DOI:10.1145/3033701

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 October 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      IHC '16 Paper Acceptance Rate58of158submissions,37%Overall Acceptance Rate331of973submissions,34%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader