Penelope Sweetser
Daniel Johnson
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
The GameFlow model strives to be a general model of player enjoyment, applicable to all game genres and platforms. Derived from a general set of heuristics for creating enjoyable player experiences, the GameFlow model has been widely used in evaluating many types of games, as well as non-game applications. Initial applications of the GameFlow model were limited to real-time strategy games. However, in order to be considered a general model of player enjoyment in games, the GameFlow model needs to be applied to a more varied set of play experiences. In this article, we revisit the design of the GameFlow model, review the various applications and derivative models, and discuss on-going analysis of the model. Subsequently, we describe a study that aims to extend the initial validation of the GameFlow model to incorporate additional game types. We report the results of expert reviews conducted using the GameFlow criteria to evaluate first person shooter games on Sony PlayStation 3 and adventure games on Apple iPhone. Our findings provide insight into the manifestation of the GameFlow elements in these types of games and also highlight some of the genre-specific considerations in the application of the GameFlow model. Key issues are raised and discussed in relation to immersion, social interaction, and multiplayer games.
- E. Adams. 2010. Fundamentals of Game Design. New Riders, Berkley, CA.Google Scholar
- L. Bleumers, A. Jacobs, and T. Van Lier. 2010. Criminal cities and enchanted forests: A user-centred assessment of the applicability of the Pervasive GameFlow model. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Fun and Games. ACM, New York, 38--47. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1823818.1823822 Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Bond and R. Beale. 2009. What makes a good game?: Using reviews to inform design. In Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology (BCS-HCI'09). British Computer Society, Swinton, UK, 418--422.Google Scholar
- J. Brand. 2012. Digital Australia 12. Interactive Games and Entertainment Association. Bond University: Gold Coast.Google Scholar
- A. Brown, P. Ceccarini, and C. Eisenhower. 2007. Muckrakers: Engaging students in the research process through an online game. Sailing into the future: Charting our destiny. In Proceedings of the 13th National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries. Association of College and Research Libraries, Chicago, IL, 226--236.Google Scholar
- D. Chertoff. 2009. Exploring additional factors of presence. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL. UMI Order Number: 3383687.Google Scholar
- H. Chu, P. Hsieh, and F.-L. Fu 2006. The design and development of scenario-based courseware. In Proceedings of the ICL Conference. Kassel University Press, Villach, Austria.Google Scholar
- K. Chu, C. Y. Wong, and C. W. Khong. 2011. Methodologies for evaluating player experience in game play. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Spinger-Verlag, Berlin, 118--122. Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Cowley, D. Charles, M. Black, and R. Hickey. 2008. Toward an understanding of flow in video games. Comput. Entertain. 6, 2, Article 20 (July 2008), 27 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1371216.1371223 Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Csikszentmihalyi. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial, New York.Google Scholar
- Y. de Kort and W. Ijsselsteijn. 2008. People, places, and play: Player experience in a socio-spatial context. Comput. Entertain. 6, 2, Article 18 (July 2008), 11 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1371216.1371221 Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Ding, N. Tang, T. Lin, and S. Zhao. 2009. RTS-GameFlow: A new evaluation framework for RTS Games. 2009 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering (Dec. 2009), 1--4. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CISE.2009.5363526 Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Engeser and F. Rheinberg. 2008. Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motivation and Emotion 32, 3, 158--172. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-008-9102-4 Google Scholar
- J. Faber and E. van den Hoven. 2011. MARBOWL: increasing the fun experience of shooting marbles. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (Jun. 2011). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0405-1 Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Finkelstein, A. Nickel, Z. Lipps, T. Barnes, Z. Wartell, and E. A. Suma. 2011. Astrojumper: Motivating exercise with an immersive virtual reality exergame. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 2011 20:1, 78--92. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00036 Google ScholarDigital Library
- F.-L. Fu, R.-C. Su, and S.-C. Yu. 2009. EGameFlow: A scale to measure learners' enjoyment of e-learning games. Comput. Educ. 52, 1 (January 2009), 101--112. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.004 Google ScholarDigital Library
- F. Gilberg. 2006. Can network security be fun? An agent-based Simulation Model and Game proposal. Master's thesis. Gjøvik University College, Norway.Google Scholar
- F. De Grove, J. Van Looy, C. Courtois, and L. De Marez. 2010. I play, therefore I learn? Measuring the Evolution of Perceived Learning and Game Experience in the Design Flow of a Serious Game. Meaningful Play. Michigan State University, Michigan, 1--32.Google Scholar
- L. Gussin. 1995. The adventure game adventure: Evolution of a genre. EventDV 8, 12 (1995), 62.Google Scholar
- W. Ijsselsteijn, Y. de Kort, K. Poels, A. Jurgelionis, and F. Bellotti. 2007. Characterising and measuring user experiences in digital games. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology 2 (2007), 27. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-580-4 Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Jacucci, A. Morrison, G. T. Richard, J. Kleimola, P. Peltonen, L. Parisi, and T. Laitinen. 2010. Worlds of information: Designing for engagement at a public multi-touch display. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2267--2276. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753669 Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Jegers. 2007a. Pervasive game flow: Understanding player enjoyment in pervasive gaming. Comput. Entertain. 5, 1, Article 9 (January 2007). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1236224.1236238 Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Jegers. 2007b. Pervasive GameFlow: A validated model of player enjoyment in pervasive gaming. In Concepts and Technologies for Pervasive Games; A Reader for Pervasive Gaming Research vol. 1, C. Magerkurth and C. Röcker (Eds.). Shaker Verlag, Aachen, Germany.Google Scholar
- K. Jegers. 2009. Elaborating eight elements of fun: Supporting design of pervasive player enjoyment. Comput. Entertain. 7, 2, Article 25 (June 2009), 22 pages. DOI:10.1145/1541895.1541905 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1541895.1541905 Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Johansson. 2009. What makes online collectible card games fun to play? In Proceedings of DiGRA 2009. Brunel University.Google Scholar
- D. Johnson and J. Gardner. 2010. Personality, motivation and video games. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI'10). ACM, New York, 276--279. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1952222.1952281 Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Kearney and M. Pivec. 2007. Immersed and how? That is the question. Games in Action Conference. Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
- J. Keller and H. Bless. 2008. Flow and regulatory compatibility: An experimental approach to the flow model of intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 34, 2, 196--209. Google ScholarCross Ref
- C.-S. Kim, E.-H. Oh, K. Yang, and J. Kim. 2009. The appealing characteristics of download type mobile games. Service Business. 4, 3--4, 253--269.Google Scholar
- E. Khoo, A. Cheok, T. Nguyen, and Z. Pan. 2008. Age invaders: social and physical inter-generational mixed reality family entertainment. Virtual Reality. 12, 1, 3--16. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Klasen, R. Weber, T. Kircher, K. Mathiak, and K. Mathias. 2011. Neural contributions to flow experience during video game playing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience.Google Scholar
- A. Kliem and J. Wiemeyer. 2010. Comparison of a traditional and a video game based balance training program. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport. 9, 2 (2010), 80--91.Google Scholar
- C. Koeffel, W. Hochleitner, J. Leitner, M. Haller, A. Geven, and M. Tscheligi. 2010. Using heuristics to evaluate the overall user experience of video games and advanced interaction games. Evaluating User Experience in Games. Springer, London, 233--256.Google Scholar
- H. Korhonen, M. Montola, and J. Arrasvuori. 2009. Understanding playful user experience through digital games. In Proceedings of DPPI. 274--285.Google Scholar
- I. Leite, A. Pereira, C. Martinho, and A. Paiva. 2008. Are emotional robots more fun to play with? RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 77--82. Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. Liao, Z. H. Chen, H. Cheng, F. C. Chen, and T. W. Chan. 2011. My-Mini-Pet: a handheld pet-nurturing game to engage students in arithmetic practices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27, 1. Blackwell, 76--89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00367.x Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Macvean and M. Riedl. 2011a. Evaluating enjoyment within alternate reality games. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Game Papers (SIGGRAPH'11). ACM, New York, Article 1, 6 pages. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2037692.2037694 Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Macvean and M. Riedl. 2011b. An enjoyment metric for the evaluation of alternate reality games. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games (FDG'11). ACM, New York, 277--279. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2159365.2159411 Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Morrison, A. Mulloni, S. Lemmelä, A. Oulasvirta, G. Jacucci, P. Peltonen, D. Schmalstieg, and H. Regenbrecht. 2011. Collaborative use of mobile augmented reality with paper maps. Computers and Graphics. 35, 4 (Aug. 2011), 789--799. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2011.04.009 Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Morrison, A. Oulasvirta, P. Peltonen, S. Lemmela, G. Jacucci, G. Reitmayr, J. Näsänen, and A. Juustila. 2009. Like bees around the hive: A comparative study of a mobile augmented reality map. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'09). ACM, New York, 1889--1898. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518991 Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Nakamura and M. Csiksgentmihalyi. 2009. Flow theory and research. In Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology (2nd Edition), C. R. Snyder and S. J. Lopez (Eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, 195--206. Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Olofsson and S. Edström. 2010. Points-of-interest collection game. Master's thesis. Umeå University, Sweden.Google Scholar
- A. Omar and N. Mohamad Ali. 2011. Measuring flow in gaming platforms. Information Retrieval (June 2011). IEEE, 302--305. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/STAIR.2011.5995806 Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Paavilainen, A. Kultima, J. Kuittinen, F. Mäyrä, H. Saarenpää, and J. Niemelä.. 2009. GameSpace: Methods for Design and Evaluation for Casual Mobile Multiplayer Games. University of Tampere, Finland.Google Scholar
- A. Pereira, C. Martinho, I. Leite, and A. Paiva. 2008. iCat, the chess player: the influence of embodiment in the enjoyment of a game. In Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS'08), 3. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 1253--1256.Google Scholar
- K. Poels, Y. de Kort, and W. Ijsselsteijn. 2007. “It is always a lot of fun!”: Exploring dimensions of digital game experience using focus group methodology. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Future Play (Future Play'07). ACM, New York, 83--89. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1328202.1328218 Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Qin, P.-L. Rau, and G. Salvendy. 2009. Measuring player immersion in the computer game narrative. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 25, 2 (Feb. 2009). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 107--133.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Saarenpää. 2008. Data gathering methods for evaluating playability of pervasive mobile games. Master's thesis. University of Tampere, Finland.Google Scholar
- J. Seland. 2008. NPC AI for the MMO RTS/RPG Call of the Kings, with focus on opponent modeling and planning under uncertainty. Copenhagen University, Denmark.Google Scholar
- M. Speelman and B. Kröse. 2008. Virtual mirror gaming in libraries. In Facial and Bodily Expressions For Control and Adaptation of Games (ECAG 2008). CTIT, 37--47.Google Scholar
- P. Sweetser and P. Wyeth. 2005. GameFlow: A model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Comput. Entertain. 3, 3 (July 2005), 3--3. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1077246.1077253 Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Tabachnick and L. Fidell. 2006. Using Multivariate Statistics (5th Edition). Allyn & Bacon, Inc., Needham Heights, MA.Google Scholar
- A.-S. A. Taylor, P. Backlund, H. Engström, M. Johannesson, and M. Lebram. 2009. Gamers against all odds. Learning by Playing: Game-based Education System Design and Development. K. Maiga Chang and Rita Kuo (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, 1--12.Google Scholar
- R. Tan, A. D. Cheok, and J. Teh. 2006. Metazoa ludens: Mixed reality environment for playing computer games with pets. The International Journal of Virtual Reality 5, 3. Springer, Berlin, 53--58.Google Scholar
- T. Tijs. 2006. Quantifying Immersion in Games by Analyzing Eye Movements. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.Google Scholar
- S. Tokuhisa, S. Okubo, K. Suguro, T. Kotabe, and M. Inakage. 2006. MYSQ: An entertainment system based on content creation directly linked to communication. Comput. Entertain. 4, 3, Article 4 (July 2006). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1146816.1146823 Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Tychsen. 2008. Crafting user experience via game metrics analysis. Proceedings of the Workshop “Research Goals and Strategies for Studying User Experience and Emotion” at NordiCHI. Lund, Sweden, 20--22.Google Scholar
- I. Wagner, W. Broll, G. Jacucci, K. Kuutii, R. McCall, A. Morrison, D. Schmalstieg, and J.-J. Terrin. 2009. On the role of presence in mixed reality. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 18, 4 (August 2009), 249--276. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/pres.18.4.249 Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Yee, H. Duh, and F. Quek. 2010. Investigating narrative in mobile games for seniors. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'10). ACM, New York, 669--672. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753424 Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Zagal, S. Chan, and J. Zhang. 2010. Measuring flow experience of computer game players. AMCIS 2010 Proceedings (2010), 137.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- GameFlow in Different Game Genres and Platforms
Recommendations
Pervasive game flow: understanding player enjoyment in pervasive gaming
Interactive entertainmentPlayer enjoyment is perhaps the most important issue in successful game design, but so far it has not been addressed in the area of pervasive games. Departing from the general gameflow model, this article presents an initial outline for a new model of ...
GameFlow heuristics for designing and evaluating real-time strategy games
IE '12: Proceedings of The 8th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Playing the SystemThe GameFlow model strives to be a general model of player enjoyment, applicable to all game genres and platforms. Derived from a general set of heuristics for creating enjoyable player experiences, the GameFlow model has been widely used in evaluating ...
GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games
Theoretical and Practical Computer Applications in EntertainmentAlthough player enjoyment is central to computer games, there is currently no accepted model of player enjoyment in games. There are many heuristics in the literature, based on elements such as the game interface, mechanics, gameplay, and narrative. ...
Comments