skip to main content
10.1145/3040565.3040566acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagess-bpmoneConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Detecting Concept Drift in Processes using Graph Metrics on Process Graphs

Authors Info & Claims
Published:30 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Work in organisations is often structured into business processes, implemented using process-aware information systems (PAISs). These systems aim to enforce employees to perform work in a certain way, executing tasks in a specified order. However, the execution strategy may change over time, leading to expected and unexpected changes in the overall process. Especially the unexpected changes may manifest without notice, which can have a big impact on the performance, costs, and compliance. Thus it is important to detect these hidden changes early in order to prevent monetary consequences. Traditional process mining techniques are unable to identify these execution changes because they usually generalise without considering time as an extra dimension, and assume stable processes. Most algorithms only produce a single process model, reflecting the behaviour of the complete analysis scope. Small changes cannot be identified as they only occur in a small part of the event log. This paper proposes a method to detect process drifts by performing statistical tests on graph metrics calculated from discovered process models. Using process models allows to additionally gather details about the structure of the drift to answer the question which changes were made to the process.

References

  1. Rafael Accorsi and Thomas Stocker. 2012. Discovering Workflow hanges with Time-based Trace Clustering. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 116 LNBIP (2012), 154--168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. R P Jagadeesh Chandra Bose, Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Indre Žliobaite, and Mykola Pechenizkiy. 2011. Handling Concept Drift in Process Mining. In Proceedings of the 23th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering. 391--405. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. P Jagadeesh Chandra Bose, Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Indre Žliobaite, and Mykola Pechenizkiy. 2014. Dealing With Concept Drifts in Process Mining. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 25, 1 (jan 2014), 154--171.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Josep Carmona and Ricard Gavaldà. 2012. Online Techniques for Dealing with Concept Drift in Process Mining. In Jreecs.Com. 90--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bill Curtis, Marc I. Kellner, and Jim Over. 1992. Process Modeling. Commun. ACM 35, 9 (sep 1992), 75--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Christian W. Günther, Stefanie Rinderle, Manfred Reichert, and Wil M. P. van der Aalst. 2006. Change Mining in Adaptive Process Management Systems. In On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: CoopIS, DOA, GADA, and ODBASE. Vol. 4275. 309--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Shen-Shyang Ho. 2005. A Martingale Framework for Concept Change Detection in Time-Varying Data Streams. Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-05) 2004 (2005), 321--327. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. B F A Hompes, J C A M Buijs, and Wil M. P. van der Aalst. 2015. Detecting Change in Processes Using Comparative Trace Clustering. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Data-driven Process Discovery and Analysis (SIMPDA 2015) (2015), 95--108. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1527/paper7.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. "IEEE Task Force on Process Mining". 2011. Process Mining Manifesto. Business Process Management Workshops (2011), 169--194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Geetika T. Lakshmanan, Paul T. Keyser, and Songyun Duan. 2011. Detecting Changes in a Semi-Structured Business Process through Spectral Graph Analysis. In 2011 IEEE 27th International Conference on Data Engineering Workshops. IEEE, 255--260. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sander J.J. Leemans, Dirk Fahland, and Wil M.P. van der Aalst. 2014. Process and Deviation Exploration with Inductive visual Miner. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 1295 (2014), 46--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Abderrahmane Maaradji, Marlon Dumas, and Marcello La Rosa. 2015. Fast and Accurate Business Process Drift Detection. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 9253 (2015), 406--422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. V. Manoj Kumar, Likewin Thomas, and B. Annappa. 2015. Capturing the Sudden Concept Drift in Process Mining. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 1371, January (2015), 132--143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. John H. McDonald. 2009. Handbook of Biological Statistics. Sparky House Publishing (2009), 291.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Timo Nolle, Alexander Seeliger, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2016. Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Noisy Business Process Event Logs Using Denoising Autoencoders. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence Series 9956 LNAI (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Alireza Ostovar, Abderrahmane Maaradji, Marcello La Rosa, Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede, and Boudewijn F. V. van Dongen. 2016. Detecting Drift from Event Streams of Unpredictable Business Processes. 1 (2016), 330--346.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Manfred Reichert, Clemens Hensinger, and Peter Dadam. 1998. Supporting Adaptive Workflows in Advanced Application Environments. EDBT Workshop on Workflow Management Systems (1998), 100--109. http://dbis.eprints.uni-ulm.de/302/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Stefanie Rinderle, Manfred Reichert, and Peter Dadam. 2004. Correctness criteria for dynamic changes in workflow systems - A survey. Data and Knowledge Engineering 50, 1 (2004), 9--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Alexander Seeliger, Timo Nolle, Benedikt Schmidt, and Max Mühlhäuser. 2016. Process Compliance Checking using Taint Flow Analysis. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Information Systems - ICIS '16. Dublin, 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Suriadi Suriadi, Chun Ouyang, Wil M. P. van der Aalst, and Arthur H. M. ter Hofstede. 2013. Root Cause Analysis with Enriched Process Logs. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 132 LNBIP (2013), 174--186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Wil M. P. van der Aalst. 2011. Process Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes. Number 2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 352 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Evgeniy Vasilyev, Diogo R. Ferreira, and Junichi Iijima. 2013. Using Inductive Reasoning to Find the Cause of Process Delays. In 2013 IEEE 15th Conference on Business Informatics. IEEE, 242--249. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. H. M W Verbeek, Joos CAM Buijs, Boudewijn F. Van Dongen, and Wil M. P. van der Aalst. 2011. XES, XESame, and ProM 6. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing 72 LNBIP (2011), 60--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. a. J. M. M. Weijters, Wil M. P. van der Aalst, and a. K. Alves De Medeiros. 2006. Process Mining with the HeuristicsMiner Algorithm. Cirp Annals-manufacturing Technology 166 (2006), 1--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Michael Werner, Nick Gehrke, and Markus Nuttgens. 2012. Business Process Mining and Reconstruction for Financial Audits. In 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 5350--5359. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Gerhard Widmer and Miroslav Kubat. 1996. Learning in the presence of concept drift and hidden contexts. Machine Learning 23, 1 (1996), 69--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Detecting Concept Drift in Processes using Graph Metrics on Process Graphs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      S-BPM ONE '17: Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Subject-oriented Business Process Management
      March 2017
      94 pages
      ISBN:9781450348621
      DOI:10.1145/3040565

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 March 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      S-BPM ONE '17 Paper Acceptance Rate9of13submissions,69%Overall Acceptance Rate28of54submissions,52%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader