ABSTRACT
Validation of business process models under involvement of stakeholders is usually performed by moderated model walkthroughs. We explore the potential of combining these established practices with interactive enactment of executable prototypes that is widely used in UI prototyping and model-based interactive system design. Based on these fields, we develop the concept of process elaboration through scaffolded virtual enactment. The proposed concepts are instantiated in a web-based tool that enables to explore the potential of the approach. An initial exploratory study could confirm that the approach is considered supportive by end users and can be used to elaborate existing process models or develop models of work process from ground up.
- Berztiss, A. 1996. Business Process Prototyping. Software Methods for Business Reengineering. Springer. 122--125.Google Scholar
- Beyer, H. and Holtzblatt, K. 1997. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bulu, S.T. and Pedersen, S. 2010. Scaffolding middle school students' content knowledge and ill-structured problem solving in a problem-based hypermedia learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development. 58, 5 (2010), 507--529.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Caporale, T. 2016. A Tool for Natural Language Oriented Business Process Modeling. (2016), 49--52.Google Scholar
- Dennen, V.P. 2004. Cognitive apprenticeship in educational practice: Research on scaffolding, modeling, mentoring, and coaching as instructional strategies. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. 2, (2004), 813--828.Google Scholar
- Dittmar, A., Forbrig, P., Heftberger, S. and Stary, C. 2004. Support for Task Modeling - A" Constructive" Exploration. (2004), 59--76. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Floch, J., Hallsteinsen, S., Stav, E., Eliassen, F., Lund, K. and Gjorven, E. 2006. Using architecture models for runtime adaptability. IEEE Software. 23, 2 (2006), 62--70. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Floyd, C. 1984. A systematic look at prototyping. Approaches to prototyping. Springer. 1--18.Google Scholar
- Forster, S., Pinggera, J. and Weber, B. 2013. Toward an Understanding of the Collaborative Process of Process Modeling. CAiSE Forum. (2013), 98--105.Google Scholar
- Front, A., Rieu, D., Santorum, M. and Movahedian, F. 2015. A participative end-user method for multi-perspective business process elicitation and improvement. Software & Systems Modeling. (2015), 1--24.Google Scholar
- Hartmann, B., Yu, L., Allison, A., Yang, Y. and Klemmer, S.R. 2008. Design as exploration: creating interface alternatives through parallel authoring and runtime tuning. (2008), 91--100. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Herrmann, T. and Loser, K.-U. 2013. Facilitating and Prompting of Collaborative Reflection of Process Models. (2013), 17--24.Google Scholar
- Herrmann, T., Hoffmann, M., Kunau, G. and Loser, K.U. 2002. Modelling Cooperative Work: Chances and Risks of Structuring. Proceedings of COOP 2002. 53--70.Google Scholar
- Herrmann, T., Kunau, G., Loser, K.U. and Menold, N. 2004. Socio-technical walkthrough: designing technology along work processes. Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices. Proceedings of the eighth Conference on Participatory design. (2004), 132--141. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Herrmann, T., Loser, K.U. and Jahnke, I. 2007. Sociotechnical walkthrough: a means for knowledge integration. The Learning Organization. 14, 5 (2007), 450--464.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hjalmarsson, A., Recker, J.C., Rosemann, M. and Lind, M. 2015. Understanding the behavior of workshop facilitators in systems analysis and design projects: Developing theory from process modeling projects. Communications of the AIS. 36, 22 (2015), 421--447.Google Scholar
- Holbrook, H. 1990. A scenario-based methodology for conducting requirements elicitation. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes. 15, 1 (Jan. 1990), 95--104. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jumaat, N.F. and Tasir, Z. 2014. Instructional Scaffolding in Online Learning Environment: A Meta-analysis. Proc. of Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering (LaTiCE), 74--77. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kensing, F. and Blomberg, J. 1998. Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 7, 3-4 (1998), 167--185. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Koschmider, A., Hornung, T. and Oberweis, A. 2011. Recommendation-based editor for business process modeling. Data & Knowledge Engineering. 70, 6 (2011), 483--503. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mori, G., Paternò, F. and Santoro, C. 2002. CTTE: Support for Developing and Analyzing Task Models for Interactive System Design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 28, 9 (2002), 797--813. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Neumann, G., Sobernig, S. and Aram, M. 2014. Evolutionary business information systems. Business \& Information Systems Engineering. 6, 1 (2014), 33--38.Google Scholar
- Nielsen, J. 1993. Iterative user-interface design. Computer. 26, 11 (1993), 32--41. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oppl, S. 2015. Articulation of subject-oriented business process models. Proceedings of S-BPM ONE 2015. 1--11. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oppl, S. 2016. Articulation of work process models for organizational alignment and informed information system design. Information & Management. 53, 5 (2016), 591--608. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oppl, S. and Hoppenbrouwers, S. 2016. Scaffolding Stakeholder-Centric Enterprise Model Articulation. The Practice of Enterprise Modeling. Springer International Publishing. 133--147.Google Scholar
- Oppl, S., Stary, C. and Vogl, S. 2016. Recognition of paper-based conceptual models captured under uncontrolled conditions. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine-Systems. (2016), in press.Google Scholar
- Pinelle, D. and Gutwin, C. 2002. Groupware walkthrough: adding context to groupware usability evaluation. (2002), 455--462. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Polson, P.G., Lewis, C., Rieman, J. and Wharton, C. 1992. Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 36, 5 (1992), 741--773. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reichert, M. and Dadam, P. 2009. Enabling adaptive process-aware information systems with ADEPT2. Handbook of Research on Business Process Modeling. (2009), 173--203.Google Scholar
- Rolland, C., Nurcan, S. and Grosz, G. 1998. A unified framework for modeling cooperative design processes and cooperative business processes. (1998), 376--385. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Santoro, F.M., Borges, M.R.S. and Pino, J.A. 2010. Acquiring knowledge on business processes from stakeholders' stories. Advanced engineering informatics. 24, 2 (Apr. 2010), 138--148. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schiffner, S., Rothschädl, T. and Meyer, N. 2014. Towards a Subject-Oriented Evolutionary Business Information System. (2014), 381--388. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Silver, B. 2009. BPMN Method and Style: A levels-based methodology for BPM process modeling and improvement using BPMN 2.0. Cody-Cassidy Press, US. (2009).Google Scholar
- Smeds, R. and Alvesalo, J. 2003. Global business process development in a virtual community of practice. Production Planning & Control. 14, 4 (2003), 361--371.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sousa, K., Mendonça, H., Lievyns, A. and Vanderdonckt, J. 2011. Getting users involved in aligning their needs with business processes models and systems. Business Process Management Journal. 17, 5 (2011), 748--786.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stender, P. and Kaiser, G. 2015. Scaffolding in complex modelling situations. ZDM. 47, 7 (2015), 1255--1267.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Su, J.-M. 2015. A self-regulated learning tutor to adaptively scaffold the personalized learning: A study on learning outcome for grade 8 Mathematics. (2015), 376--380.Google Scholar
- Sukaviriya, N., Sinha, V., Ramachandra, T., Mani, S. and Stolze, M. 2007. User-centered design and business process modeling: cross road in rapid prototyping tools. (2007), 165--178. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Van de Pol, J., Volman, M. and Beishuizen, J. 2010. Scaffolding in teacher--student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review. 22, 3 (2010), 271--296.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wachholder, D. and Oppl, S. 2014. Interactive Coupling of Process Models: A Distributed Tabletop Approach to Collaborative Modeling. ECCE '14: Proceedings of the 2014 European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. (Sep. 2014), 1--8. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wachholder, D. and Oppl, S. 2012. Stakeholder-Driven Collaborative Modeling of Subject-Oriented Business Processes. S-BPM ONE - Scientific Research. C. Stary, ed. Springer. 145--162.Google Scholar
- Weske, M. 2010. Business process management: concepts, languages, architectures. Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wood, D., Bruner, J.S. and Ross, G. 1976. The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry. 17, 2 (1976), 89--100.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Business Process Elaboration through Virtual Enactment
Recommendations
A deviation management system for handling software process enactment evolution
ICSP'08: Proceedings of the Software process, 2008 international conference on Making globally distributed software development a success storyAn important problem encountered in Process-centered Software EngineeringEnvironments (PSEE) is that software development processes aresubject to permanent evolution during enactment. Without managing evolution,PSEEs are condemned to fail in being ...
Tolerating Deviations in Process Support Systems via Flexible Enactment of Process Models
Process Support Systems (PSSs) support business organizations in modeling, improving, and automating their business process. Thanks to their ability in enacting process models, they can be used to guide people in performing their daily work and to ...
Batch activity: enhancing business process modeling and enactment with batch processing
AbstractOrganizations strive for efficiency in their business processes by process improvement and automation. Business process management (BPM) supports these efforts by capturing business processes in process models serving as blueprint for a number of ...
Comments