skip to main content
10.1145/3040565.3040568acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagess-bpmoneConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Business Process Elaboration through Virtual Enactment

Published:30 March 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Validation of business process models under involvement of stakeholders is usually performed by moderated model walkthroughs. We explore the potential of combining these established practices with interactive enactment of executable prototypes that is widely used in UI prototyping and model-based interactive system design. Based on these fields, we develop the concept of process elaboration through scaffolded virtual enactment. The proposed concepts are instantiated in a web-based tool that enables to explore the potential of the approach. An initial exploratory study could confirm that the approach is considered supportive by end users and can be used to elaborate existing process models or develop models of work process from ground up.

References

  1. Berztiss, A. 1996. Business Process Prototyping. Software Methods for Business Reengineering. Springer. 122--125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Beyer, H. and Holtzblatt, K. 1997. Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bulu, S.T. and Pedersen, S. 2010. Scaffolding middle school students' content knowledge and ill-structured problem solving in a problem-based hypermedia learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development. 58, 5 (2010), 507--529.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Caporale, T. 2016. A Tool for Natural Language Oriented Business Process Modeling. (2016), 49--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dennen, V.P. 2004. Cognitive apprenticeship in educational practice: Research on scaffolding, modeling, mentoring, and coaching as instructional strategies. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. 2, (2004), 813--828.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dittmar, A., Forbrig, P., Heftberger, S. and Stary, C. 2004. Support for Task Modeling - A" Constructive" Exploration. (2004), 59--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Floch, J., Hallsteinsen, S., Stav, E., Eliassen, F., Lund, K. and Gjorven, E. 2006. Using architecture models for runtime adaptability. IEEE Software. 23, 2 (2006), 62--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Floyd, C. 1984. A systematic look at prototyping. Approaches to prototyping. Springer. 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Forster, S., Pinggera, J. and Weber, B. 2013. Toward an Understanding of the Collaborative Process of Process Modeling. CAiSE Forum. (2013), 98--105.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Front, A., Rieu, D., Santorum, M. and Movahedian, F. 2015. A participative end-user method for multi-perspective business process elicitation and improvement. Software & Systems Modeling. (2015), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hartmann, B., Yu, L., Allison, A., Yang, Y. and Klemmer, S.R. 2008. Design as exploration: creating interface alternatives through parallel authoring and runtime tuning. (2008), 91--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Herrmann, T. and Loser, K.-U. 2013. Facilitating and Prompting of Collaborative Reflection of Process Models. (2013), 17--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Herrmann, T., Hoffmann, M., Kunau, G. and Loser, K.U. 2002. Modelling Cooperative Work: Chances and Risks of Structuring. Proceedings of COOP 2002. 53--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Herrmann, T., Kunau, G., Loser, K.U. and Menold, N. 2004. Socio-technical walkthrough: designing technology along work processes. Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices. Proceedings of the eighth Conference on Participatory design. (2004), 132--141. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Herrmann, T., Loser, K.U. and Jahnke, I. 2007. Sociotechnical walkthrough: a means for knowledge integration. The Learning Organization. 14, 5 (2007), 450--464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Hjalmarsson, A., Recker, J.C., Rosemann, M. and Lind, M. 2015. Understanding the behavior of workshop facilitators in systems analysis and design projects: Developing theory from process modeling projects. Communications of the AIS. 36, 22 (2015), 421--447.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Holbrook, H. 1990. A scenario-based methodology for conducting requirements elicitation. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes. 15, 1 (Jan. 1990), 95--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jumaat, N.F. and Tasir, Z. 2014. Instructional Scaffolding in Online Learning Environment: A Meta-analysis. Proc. of Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering (LaTiCE), 74--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kensing, F. and Blomberg, J. 1998. Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 7, 3-4 (1998), 167--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Koschmider, A., Hornung, T. and Oberweis, A. 2011. Recommendation-based editor for business process modeling. Data & Knowledge Engineering. 70, 6 (2011), 483--503. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mori, G., Paternò, F. and Santoro, C. 2002. CTTE: Support for Developing and Analyzing Task Models for Interactive System Design. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 28, 9 (2002), 797--813. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Neumann, G., Sobernig, S. and Aram, M. 2014. Evolutionary business information systems. Business \& Information Systems Engineering. 6, 1 (2014), 33--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Nielsen, J. 1993. Iterative user-interface design. Computer. 26, 11 (1993), 32--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Oppl, S. 2015. Articulation of subject-oriented business process models. Proceedings of S-BPM ONE 2015. 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Oppl, S. 2016. Articulation of work process models for organizational alignment and informed information system design. Information & Management. 53, 5 (2016), 591--608. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Oppl, S. and Hoppenbrouwers, S. 2016. Scaffolding Stakeholder-Centric Enterprise Model Articulation. The Practice of Enterprise Modeling. Springer International Publishing. 133--147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Oppl, S., Stary, C. and Vogl, S. 2016. Recognition of paper-based conceptual models captured under uncontrolled conditions. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine-Systems. (2016), in press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Pinelle, D. and Gutwin, C. 2002. Groupware walkthrough: adding context to groupware usability evaluation. (2002), 455--462. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Polson, P.G., Lewis, C., Rieman, J. and Wharton, C. 1992. Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 36, 5 (1992), 741--773. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Reichert, M. and Dadam, P. 2009. Enabling adaptive process-aware information systems with ADEPT2. Handbook of Research on Business Process Modeling. (2009), 173--203.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Rolland, C., Nurcan, S. and Grosz, G. 1998. A unified framework for modeling cooperative design processes and cooperative business processes. (1998), 376--385. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Santoro, F.M., Borges, M.R.S. and Pino, J.A. 2010. Acquiring knowledge on business processes from stakeholders' stories. Advanced engineering informatics. 24, 2 (Apr. 2010), 138--148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Schiffner, S., Rothschädl, T. and Meyer, N. 2014. Towards a Subject-Oriented Evolutionary Business Information System. (2014), 381--388. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Silver, B. 2009. BPMN Method and Style: A levels-based methodology for BPM process modeling and improvement using BPMN 2.0. Cody-Cassidy Press, US. (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Smeds, R. and Alvesalo, J. 2003. Global business process development in a virtual community of practice. Production Planning & Control. 14, 4 (2003), 361--371.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Sousa, K., Mendonça, H., Lievyns, A. and Vanderdonckt, J. 2011. Getting users involved in aligning their needs with business processes models and systems. Business Process Management Journal. 17, 5 (2011), 748--786.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Stender, P. and Kaiser, G. 2015. Scaffolding in complex modelling situations. ZDM. 47, 7 (2015), 1255--1267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Su, J.-M. 2015. A self-regulated learning tutor to adaptively scaffold the personalized learning: A study on learning outcome for grade 8 Mathematics. (2015), 376--380.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Sukaviriya, N., Sinha, V., Ramachandra, T., Mani, S. and Stolze, M. 2007. User-centered design and business process modeling: cross road in rapid prototyping tools. (2007), 165--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Van de Pol, J., Volman, M. and Beishuizen, J. 2010. Scaffolding in teacher--student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review. 22, 3 (2010), 271--296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Wachholder, D. and Oppl, S. 2014. Interactive Coupling of Process Models: A Distributed Tabletop Approach to Collaborative Modeling. ECCE '14: Proceedings of the 2014 European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics. (Sep. 2014), 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Wachholder, D. and Oppl, S. 2012. Stakeholder-Driven Collaborative Modeling of Subject-Oriented Business Processes. S-BPM ONE - Scientific Research. C. Stary, ed. Springer. 145--162.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Weske, M. 2010. Business process management: concepts, languages, architectures. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Wood, D., Bruner, J.S. and Ross, G. 1976. The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry. 17, 2 (1976), 89--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Business Process Elaboration through Virtual Enactment

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        S-BPM ONE '17: Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Subject-oriented Business Process Management
        March 2017
        94 pages
        ISBN:9781450348621
        DOI:10.1145/3040565

        Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

        This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 30 March 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        S-BPM ONE '17 Paper Acceptance Rate9of13submissions,69%Overall Acceptance Rate28of54submissions,52%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader