skip to main content
10.1145/3056540.3056547acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Comparing Conventional and Augmented Reality Instructions for Manual Assembly Tasks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 June 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Augmented Reality (AR) gains increased attention as a means to provide assistance for different human activities. Hereby the suitability of AR does not only depend on the respective task, but also to a high degree on the respective device. In a standardized assembly task, we tested AR-based in-situ assistance against conventional pictorial instructions using a smartphone, Microsoft HoloLens and Epson Moverio BT-200 smart glasses as well as paper-based instructions. Participants solved the task fastest using the paper instructions, but made less errors with AR assistance on the Microsoft HoloLens smart glasses than with any other system. Methodically we propose operational definitions of time segments and other optimizations for standardized benchmarking of AR assembly instructions.

References

  1. T. P. Caudell and D. W. Mizell. Augmented reality: An application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. System Sciences, 1992. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. M. Funk, T. Kosch, S. W. Greenwald, and A. Schmidt. A benchmark for interactive augmented reality instructions for assembly tasks. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, MUM '15, pages 253--257, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Funk, T. Kosch, and A. Schmidt. Interactive worker assistance: comparing the effects of in-situ projection, head-mounted displays, tablet, and paper instructions. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, pages 934--939. ACM, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Funk, S. Mayer, M. Nistor, and A. Schmidt. Mobile in-situ pick-by-vision: Order picking support using a projector helmet. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, page 45. ACM, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Funk, S. Mayer, and A. Schmidt. Using in-situ projection to support cognitively impaired workers at the workplace. In Proceedings of the 17th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility, pages 185--192. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. S. Gauglitz, C. Lee, M. Turk, and T. Höllerer. Integrating the physical environment into mobile remote collaboration. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI '12, pages 241--250, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S. G. Hart. Nasa-task load index (nasa-tlx); 20 years later. Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. S. J. Henderson and S. Feiner. Evaluating the benefits of augmented reality for task localization in maintenance of an armored personnel carrier turret. Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. B. M. Khuong, K. Kiyokawa, A. Miller, J. J. L. Viola, T. Mashita, and H. Takemura. The effectiveness of an ar-based context-aware assembly support system in object assembly. In 2014 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), pages 57--62, March 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. N. Petersen, A. Pagani, and D. Stricker. Real-time modeling and tracking manual workflows from first-person vision. In 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pages 117--124, Oct. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. P. Renner and T. Pfeiffer. Attention Guiding Techniques using Peripheral Vision and Eye Tracking for Feedback in Augmented-Reality-based Assistance Systems. In 2017 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). IEEE, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. L. Rodriguez, F. Quint, D. Gorecky, D. Romero, and H. R. Siller. Developing a Mixed Reality Assistance System Based on Projection Mapping Technology for Manual Operations at Assembly Workstations. Procedia Computer Science, 75:327--333, Jan. 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. O. Sand, S. Büttner, V. Paelke, and C. Röcker. smARt.Assembly - Projection-Based Augmented Reality for Supporting Assembly Workers. In S. Lackey and R. Shumaker, editors, Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 643--652. Springer International Publishing, July 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. B. Schwerdtfeger and G. Klinker. Supporting Order Picking with Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR '08, pages 91--94, Washington, DC, USA, 2008. IEEE Computer Society. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Tang, C. Owen, F. Biocca, and W. Mou. Comparative Effectiveness of Augmented Reality in Object Assembly. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '03, pages 73--80, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Comparing Conventional and Augmented Reality Instructions for Manual Assembly Tasks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PETRA '17: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments
      June 2017
      455 pages
      ISBN:9781450352277
      DOI:10.1145/3056540

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 June 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader