skip to main content
research-article

Activity Recommendation with Partners

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 September 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Recommending social activities, such as watching movies or having dinner, is a common function found in social networks or e-commerce sites. Besides certain websites which manage activity-related locations (e.g., foursquare.com), many items on product sale platforms (e.g., groupon.com) can naturally be mapped to social activities. For example, movie tickets can be thought of as activity items, which can be mapped as a social activity of “watch a movie.” Traditional recommender systems estimate the degree of interest for a target user on candidate items (or activities), and accordingly, recommend the top-k activity items to the user. However, these systems ignore an important social characteristic of recommended activities: people usually tend to participate in those activities with friends. This article considers this fact for improving the effectiveness of recommendation in two directions. First, we study the problem of activity-partner recommendation; i.e., for each recommended activity item, find a suitable partner for the user. This (i) saves the user’s time for finding activity partners, (ii) increases the likelihood that the activity item will be selected by the user, and (iii) improves the effectiveness of recommender systems to users overall and enkindles their social enthusiasm. Our partner recommender is built upon the users’ historical attendance preferences, their social context, and geographic information. Moreover, we explore how to leverage the partner recommendation to help improve the effectiveness of recommending activities to users. Assuming that users tend to select the activities for which they can find suitable partners, we propose a partner-aware activity recommendation model, which integrates this hypothesis into conventional recommendation approaches. Finally, the recommended items not only match users’ interests, but also have high chances to be selected by the users, because the users can find suitable partners to attend the corresponding activities together. We conduct experiments on real data to evaluate the effectiveness of activity-partner recommendation and partner-aware activity recommendation. The results verify that (i) suggesting partners greatly improves the likelihood that a recommended activity item is to be selected by the target user and (ii) considering the existence of suitable partners in the ranking of recommended items improves the accuracy of recommendation significantly.

References

  1. L. A. Adamic and E. Adar. 2003. Friends and neighbors on the web. Social Networks 25, 3 (2003), 211--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. S. Amer-Yahia, S. B. Roy, A. Chawlat, G. Das, and C. Yu. 2009. Group recommendation: Semantics and efficiency. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment (2009), 754--765. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Anderson, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and J. Leskovec. 2012. Effects of user similarity in social media. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 703--712. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Bao, Y. Zheng, and M. F. Mokbel. 2012. Location-based and preference-aware recommendation using sparse geo-social networking data. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 199--208. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Bao, Y. Zheng, D. Wilkie, and M. Mokbel. 2015. Recommendations in location-based social networks: A survey. GeoInformatica 19, 3 (2015), 525--565. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. Chen, Y. Haiqin, K. Irwin, and L. Michael. 2012. Fused matrix factorization with geographical and social influence in location-based social networks. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Chen, W. Geyer, C. Dugan, M. Muller, and I. Guy. 2009. Make new friends, but keep the old: Recommending people on social networking sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 201--210. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. E. Cho, S. A Myers, and J. Leskovec. 2011. Friendship and mobility: User movement in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 1082--1090. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Y. Chow, J. Bao, and M. F. Mokbel. 2010. Towards location-based social networking services. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Location Based Social Networks. ACM, 31--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Crossen, J. Budzik, and K. J. Hammond. 2002. Flytrap: Intelligent group music recommendation. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 184--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. H. Gao, J. Tang, and H. Liu. 2012. gSCorr: Modeling geo-social correlations for new check-ins on location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 1582--1586. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. Gorla, N. Lathia, S. Robertson, and J. Wang. 2013. Probabilistic group recommendation via information matching. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web. 495--504. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Gunawardana and G. Shani. 2009. A survey of accuracy evaluation metrics of recommendation tasks. Journal of Machine Learning Research 10 (2009), 2935--2962. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Hannon, M. Bennett, and B. Smyth. 2010. Recommending twitter users to follow using content and collaborative filtering approaches. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 199--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Q. He, J. Pei, D. Kifer, P. Mitra, and L. Giles. 2010. Context-aware citation recommendation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web. 421--430. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. T. Horozov, N. Narasimhan, and V. Vasudevan. 2006. Using location for personalized POI recommendations in mobile environments. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Applications and the Internet. IEEE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. A. Jameson and B. Smyth. 2007. Recommendation to groups. In The Adaptive Web. Springer, 596--627. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Y. Koren, R. Bell, and C. Volinsky. 2009. Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer 42, 8 (2009), 30--37. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. J. Levandoski, M. Sarwat, A. Eldawy, and M. F. Mokbel. 2012. Lars: A location-aware recommender system. In International Conference on Data Engineering. IEEE, 450--461. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Q. Li, Y. Zheng, X. Xie, Y. Chen, W. Liu, and W. Ma. 2008. Mining user similarity based on location history. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. H. Lieberman, N. Van Dyke, and A. Vivacqua. 1999. Let’s browse: A collaborative browsing agent. Knowledge-Based Systems 12, 8 (1999), 427--431. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. B. Liu, Y. Fu, Z. Yao, and H. Xiong. 2013. Learning geographical preferences for point-of-interest recommendation. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 1043--1051. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A. Noulas, S. Scellato, C. Mascolo, and M. Pontil. 2011. An empirical study of geographic user activity patterns in foursquare.International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media 11 (2011), 70--573.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. E. Ntoutsi, K. Stefanidis, K. Nørvåg, and H. P. Kriegel. 2012. Fast group recommendations by applying user clustering. In Conceptual Modeling. Springer, 126--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. S. Purushotham, C. J. Kuo, J. Shahabdeen, and L. Nachman. 2014. Collaborative group-activity recommendation in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Crowdsourced and Volunteered Geographic Information. ACM, 8--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. R. W. Root and S. Draper. 1983. Questionnaires as a software evaluation tool. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 83--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl. 2001. Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web. 285--295. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. S. Scellato, A. Noulas, and C. Mascolo. 2011. Exploiting place features in link prediction on location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 1046--1054. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. J. B. Schafer, D. Frankowski, J. Herlocker, and S. Sen. 2007. Collaborative filtering recommender systems. In The Adaptive Web. 291--324. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. C. Senot, D. Kostadinov, M. Bouzid, J. Picault, A. Aghasaryan, and C. Bernier. 2010. Analysis of strategies for building group profiles. In Proceedings of the International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. Springer, 40--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. W. Tu, D. Cheung, N. Mamoulis, M. Yang, and Z. Lu. 2015. Activity-partner recommendation. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Springer, 591--604.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. H. Wang, M. Terrovitis, and N. Mamoulis. 2013. Location recommendation in location-based social networks using user check-in data. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 374--383. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. W. Wang, H. Yin, L. Chen, Y. Sun, S. Sadiq, and X. Zhou. 2015. Geo-SAGE: A geographical sparse additive generative model for spatial item recommendation. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 1255--1264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. W. Wang, H. Yin, S. Sadiq, L. Chen, M. Xie, and X. Zhou. 2016. SPORE: A sequential personalized spatial item recommender system. In International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. S. Wu, J. Sun, and J. Tang. 2013. Patent partner recommendation in enterprise social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 43--52. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. X. Xiao, Y. Zheng, Q. Luo, and X. Xie. 2010. Finding similar users using category-based location history. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 442--445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. J. Ye, Z. Zhu, and H. Cheng. 2013. What’s your next move: User activity prediction in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. M. Ye, X. Liu, and W. C. Lee. 2012. Exploring social influence for recommendation: A generative model approach. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 671--680. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. M. Ye, P. Yin, and W. C. Lee. 2010. Location recommendation for location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 458--461. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. M. Ye, P. Yin, W.C. Lee, and D. L. Lee. 2011. Exploiting geographical influence for collaborative point-of-interest recommendation. In Proceedings of the International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 325--334. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. H. Yin, B. Cui, Y. Sun, Z. Hu, and L. Chen. 2014. LCARS: A spatial item recommender system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 32, 3 (2014), 11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. H. Yin, Y. Sun, B. Cui, Z. Hu, and L. Chen. 2013. LCARS: A location-content-aware recommender system. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 221--229. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. H. Yin, X. Zhou, Y. Shao, H. Wang, and S. Sadiq. 2015. Joint modeling of user check-in behaviors for point-of-interest recommendation. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 1631--1640. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. J. Ying, H. Lu, W. Kuo, and V. Tseng. 2012. Urban point-of-interest recommendation by mining user check-in behaviors. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Workshop on Urban Computing. ACM, 63--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Z. Yu, X. Zhou, Y. Hao, and J. Gu. 2006. TV program recommendation for multiple viewers based on user profile merging. User Modeling and User-adapted Interaction 16, 1 (2006), 63--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Q. Yuan, G. Cong, and C. Y. Lin. 2014. COM: A generative model for group recommendation. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 163--172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. W. Zhang and J. Wang. 2015. A collective Bayesian Poisson factorization model for cold-start local event recommendation. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 1455--1464. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Y. Zheng and X. Xie. 2010. Learning location correlation from GPS trajectories. In International Conference on Mobile Data Management. IEEE, 27--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Y. Zheng, L. Zhang, Z. Ma, X. Xie, and W.-Y. Ma. 2011. Recommending friends and locations based on individual location history. ACM Transactions on the Web 5, 1 (2011), 5. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Y. Zheng, L. Zhang, X. Xie, and W.-Y. Ma. 2009. Mining correlation between locations using human location history. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 472--475. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Activity Recommendation with Partners

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on the Web
      ACM Transactions on the Web  Volume 12, Issue 1
      February 2018
      169 pages
      ISSN:1559-1131
      EISSN:1559-114X
      DOI:10.1145/3133955
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 September 2017
      • Accepted: 1 July 2017
      • Revised: 1 May 2017
      • Received: 1 December 2015
      Published in tweb Volume 12, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader