skip to main content
10.1145/3123024.3124558acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

How blocking distractions affects workplace focus and productivity

Published:11 September 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Information workers are faced with ever-increasing online distractions in the workplace. Website blockers are one solution toward preventing unwanted distractions. We conducted an in situ field study with 32 information workers in their workplace to test if the use of blocking software can increase focus and productivity by preventing non-work-related distractions. Participants worked for five days in a baseline condition and then worked five days where online distractions were blocked with software. We discovered that with blocking software, participants assessed their productivity significantly higher and could focus significantly longer. People who benefited the most from the software were those who were most distracted by social media. Interviews revealed individual differences in self-control in managing distractions. Resultant changes in work behaviors included switching from online distractions to physical breaks of leaving the office. An unexpected consequence of cutting off distractions for people with less self-control was that they were more focused and worked longer without taking breaks and therefore, experienced higher stress. We present design recommendations to promote focus for the variety of coping behaviors we observed.

References

  1. Ritu Agarwal and Elena Karahanna. 2000. Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quaterly, 24 (4). 665--694. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Delve Analytics. https://products.office.com/en-us/business/explore-office-delve?tab=Discovery.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Daniel Epstein, Daniel Avrahami, and Jacob T. Biehl, 2016. Taking 5: Work-breaks, productivity, and opportunities for personal informatics for knowledge workers. Proc of CHI 2016, 673--684. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Focus. Retrieved 2016. Available at http://masterbuilders.io/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Focus booster. Retrieved 2016. Available at https://www.focusboosterapp.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Freedom. 2016. Retrieved 2016. https://freedom.to/freedom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of a multi-dimensional workload rating scale: Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P.A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds). Human mental workload, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 139--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sture Holm. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian journal of statistics, 6, 65--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Markus Löchtefeld, Matthias Böhmer, and Lyubomir Ganev. 2013. AppDetox: helping users with mobile app addiction. Proceedings of Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia'13. ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 43, 2 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gloria Mark, Shamsi Iqbal, Mary Czerwinski, and Paul Johns. 2014. Capturing the mood: Facebook and face-to-face encounters in the workplace. In Proceedings of CSCW '14, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1082--1094. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gloria Mark, Stephen Voida, and Armand Cardello. 2012. A pace not dictated by electrons: an empirical study of work without email. Proceedings of CHI'12, ACM, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gloria Mark, Daniela Hausstein, and Ulrich Kloecke, 2008. The cost of interrupted work: More speed, more stress. Proceeding of CHI'08, Florence, Italy, ACM Press, pp. 107--110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Daniel McFarlane. 2002. Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruptions of people in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 17(1), 1--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Martin Pielot and Luz Rello. Productive, Anxious, Lonely-24 Hours Without Push Notifications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.02314 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Pomodoro technique. 2016. Retrieved 2016. http://pomodorotechnique.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. RescueTime. 2016. Retrieved 2016. https://www.rescuetime.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Joshua S. Rubinstein, David E. Meyer, and Jeffrey E. Evans. 2001. Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. J of Exp'l Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27.4: 763.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Anya Skatova, Ben Bedwell, Victoria Shipp, Yitong Huang, Alexandra Young, Tom Rodden, and Emma Bertenshaw, 2016. The Role of ICT in Office Work Breaks. Proceedings of CHI'16, 3049--3060. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. StayFocused. 2016. Retrieved 2016 from http://www.stayfocusedapp.me/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. S. P. Whiteside and D. R. Lynam, D. R. (2001). The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(4), 669--689Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Steve Whittaker, Vaiva Kalnikaite, Victoria Hollis, & Andrew Guydish. 2016. 'Don't Waste My Time': Use of Time Information Improves Focus. Proceedings of CHI'16, pp. 1729--1738. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Christopher D. Wickens, 1980. The structure of attentional resources. Attention and Performance VIII, 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. How blocking distractions affects workplace focus and productivity

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        UbiComp '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
        September 2017
        1089 pages
        ISBN:9781450351904
        DOI:10.1145/3123024

        Copyright © 2017 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 September 2017

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • extended-abstract

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate764of2,912submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader