- 1.Proceedings of the A CL 'gV/EA CL '97 Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization. Madrid, Spain, 1997.Google Scholar
- 2.Aone, C., Okurowski, M. E., Gorlinsky, J., and Larsen, B. A scalable summarization system using robust NLP. {1}, pp. 66-73.Google Scholar
- 3.Baldwin, B., and Morton, T. S. Dynamic coreferencebased summarization. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-3) (Granada, Spain, June 1998).Google Scholar
- 4.Banko, M., Mittal, V., Kantrowitz, M., and Goldstein, J. Generating extraction based summaries from handwritten summaries by aligning text spans. In Proceedings of PACLING-99 (to appear) (Waterloo, Ontario, July 1999).Google Scholar
- 5.Barzilay, R., and Elhadad, M. Using lexical chains for text summarization. {1}, pp. 10-17.Google Scholar
- 6.Boguraev, B., and Kennedy, C. Salience based content characterization of text documents. {1}, pp. 2-9.Google Scholar
- 7.Buckley, C. Implementation of the SMART information retrieval system. Tech. Rep. TR 85-686, Cornell University, 1985. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.Carbonell, J. G., and Goldstein, J. The use of MMR, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and producing summaries. In Proceedings of SIGIR-98 (Melbourne, Australia, Aug. 1998). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9.Hovy, E., and Lin, C.-Y. Automated text summarization in SUMMARIST. {1}, pp. 18-24. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.Jing, H., Barzilay, R., McKeown, K., and Elhadad, M. Summarization evaluation methods experiments and analysis. In AAAI Intelligent Text Summarization Workshop (Stanford, CA, Mar. 1998), pp. 60-68.Google Scholar
- 11.Jones, K. S., and Galliers, J. R. Evaluating Natural Language Processing Systems: an Analysis and Review. Springer, New York, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Klavans, J. L., and Shaw, J. Lexical semantics in summarization. In Proceedings of the First Annual Workshop of the IFIP Working Group FOR NLP and KR (Nantes, France, Apr. 1995).Google Scholar
- 13.Luhn, P. H. Automatic creation of literature abstracts. IBM Journal (1958), 159-165.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14.Mani, I., House, D., Klain, G., Hirschman, L., Obrst, L., Firmin, T., Chrzanowski, M., and Sundheim, B. The tipster summac text summarization evaluation. Tech. Rep. MTR 98W0000138, Mitre, October 1998.Google Scholar
- 15.Marcu, D. From discourse structures to text summaries. {1}, pp. 82-88.Google Scholar
- 16.McKeown, K., Robin, J., and Kukich, K. Designing and evaluating a new revision-based model for summary generation. Info. Proc. and Management 31, 5 (1995). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17.Mitra, M., Singhal, A., and Buckley, C. Automatic text summarization by paragraph extraction. {1}.Google Scholar
- 18.Mittal, V. O., Kantrowitz, M., Goldstein, J., and Carbonell, J. Selecting Text Spans for Document Summaries: Heuristics and Metrics. In Proceedings of AAAI-99 (Orlando, FL, July 1999). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 19.Paice, C. D. Constructing literature abstracts by computer: Techniques and prospects. Info. Proc. and Management 26 (1990), 171-186. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20.Radev, D., and McKeown, K. Generating natural language summaries from multiple online sources. Computational Linguistics 24, 3 (September 1998), 469-501. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21.Salton, G., Allan, J., Buckley, C., and Singhal, A. Automatic analysis, theme generation, and summarization of machinereadable texts. Science 264 (1994), 1421-1426.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 22.Salton, G., and Buckley, C. Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of American Society for Information Sciences 41 (1990), 288-297.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 23.Salton, G., and McGill, M. J. Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval. McGraw-Hill Computer Science Series. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1983. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 24.Shaw, J. Conciseness through aggregation in text generation. In Proceedings of 33rd Association for Computational Linguistics (1995), pp. 329-331. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 25.Strzalkowski, T., Wang, J., and Wise, B. A robust practical text summarization system. In AAAI Intelligent Text Summarization Workshop (Stanford, CA, Mar. 1998), pp. 26-30.Google Scholar
- 26.Tait, J. I. Automatic Summarizing of English Texts. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, 1983.Google Scholar
- 27.Xu, J., and Croft, B. Query expansion using local and global document analysis. In Proceedings of the 19th A CM/SIGIR (SIGIR-96) (1996), ACM, pp. 4-11. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Summarizing text documents: sentence selection and evaluation metrics
Recommendations
An Intelligent Information System for Organizing Online Text Documents
This paper describes an intelligent information system for effectively managing huge amounts of online text documents (such as Web documents) in a hierarchical manner. The organizational capabilities of this system are able to evolve semi-automatically ...
A classification-based summarisation model for summarising text documents
The work presents a CBS: classification-based summarisation model that performs automatic summarisation of the text through classification. Summarisation systems are the need of the hour, since information is overloaded in the web and extracting ...
Metric Learning for Text Documents
Many algorithms in machine learning rely on being given a good distance metric over the input space. Rather than using a default metric such as the Euclidean metric, it is desirable to obtain a metric based on the provided data. We consider the problem ...
Comments