Abstract
With the increasingly frequent appearance of mobile phones in college classrooms, there have been growing concerns regarding their negative aspects including distractive off-task multitasking. In this work, we design and evaluate Let’s FOCUS, a software-based intervention service that assists college students in self-regulating their mobile phone use in classrooms. Our preliminary survey study (with 47 professors and 283 students) reveals that it is critical to encourage voluntary participation by framing intervention as a learning tool and to raise awareness regarding appropriate mobile phone usage by establishing social norms in colleges. Let’s FOCUS introduces a virtual limiting space for each class (or a virtual classroom) where the students can explicitly restrict their mobile phone use voluntarily. Furthermore, it promotes students’ willing participation by leveraging social facilitation and context-aware reminders associated with virtual classrooms. We conducted a campus-wide campaign for approximately six weeks to evaluate the feasibility of the proposed approach. The results confirm that 379 students used the app to limit 9,335 hours of mobile phone usage over 233 classrooms. Let’s FOCUS was used in diverse learning contexts and for different purposes and its social learning and context-awareness features significantly motivated prolonged participation. We present the design considerations of software-based intervention.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, Let’s FOCUS: Mitigating Mobile Phone Use in College Classrooms
- Elena Agapie, Daniel Avrahami, and Jennifer Marlow. 2016. Staying the Course: System-Driven Lapse Management for Supporting Behavior Change. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1072--1083. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Luigi Atzori, Antonio Iera, and Giacomo Morabito. 2010. The Internet of Things: A Survey. Computer Networks 54, 15 (2010), 2787--2805. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marsha L Bayless, Timothy W Clipson, and S Wilson. 2013. Faculty Perceptions and Policies of Students’ Use Of Personal Technology in the Classroom. (2013).Google Scholar
- Laura L Bowman, Laura E Levine, Bradley M Waite, and Michael Gendron. 2010. Can Students Really Multitask? An Experimental Study of Instant Messaging While Reading. Computers 8Education 54, 4 (2010), 927--931. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rachelle Campigotto, Rhonda McEwen, and Carrie Demmans Epp. 2013. Especially Social: Exploring the Use of an iOS Application in Special Needs Classrooms. Computers 8 Education 60, 1 (2013), 74--86. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Quan Chen and Zheng Yan. 2016. Does Multitasking with Mobile Phones Affect Learning? A Review. Computers in Human Behavior 54 (2016), 34--42. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hopke K D. 2009. Student Cell Phone Use in College Classrooms. National Undergraduate Research Clearinghouse 12 (2009).Google Scholar
- James N Druckman and Toby Bolsen. 2011. Framing, Motivated Reasoning, and Opinions About Emergent Technologies. Journal of Communication 61, 4 (2011), 659--688.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sanford Finkel, Sara J Czaja, Zoran Martinovich, Carol Harris, Donna Pezzuto, and Richard Schulz. 2007. E-care: A Telecommunications Technology Intervention for Family Caregivers of Dementia Patients. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 15, 5 (2007), 443--448.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Carrie B Fried. 2008. In-class Laptop Use and Its Effects on Student Learning. Computers 8 Education 50, 3 (2008), 906--914. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Patrick Gaudreau, Dave Miranda, and Alexandre Gareau. 2014. Canadian University Students in Wireless Classrooms: What Do They Do On Their Laptops and Does It Really Matter? Computers 8 Education 70 (2014), 245--255.Google Scholar
- Amanda C Gingerich and Tara T Lineweaver. 2014. OMG! Texting in Class= U Fail:(Empirical Evidence That Text Messaging During Class Disrupts Comprehension. Teaching of psychology 41, 1 (2014), 44--51.Google Scholar
- Alexis Hiniker, Sungsoo Ray Hong, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Julie A Kientz. 2016. MyTime: Designing and Evaluating an Intervention for Smartphone Non-use. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4746--4757. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stephen S Intille. 2004. A New Research Challenge: Persuasive Technology to Motivate Healthy Aging. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 8, 3 (2004), 235--237. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Reynol Junco and Shelia R Cotten. 2012. No A 4 U: The Relationship Between Multitasking and Academic Performance. Computers 8 Education 59, 2 (2012), 505--514. Google ScholarDigital Library
- James E Katz. 2005. Mobile Phones in Educational Settings. A Sense of Place: The Global and the Local in Mobile Communication (2005), 305--317.Google Scholar
- Jaejeung Kim, Chiwoo Cho, and Uichin Lee. 2017. Technology Supported Behavior Restriction for Mitigating Self-Interruptions in Multi-device Environments. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies (IMWUT) (2017). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Young-Ho Kim, Jae Ho Jeon, Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, KwonHyun Kim, and Jinwook Seo. 2016. TimeAware: Leveraging Framing Effects to Enhance Personal Productivity. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 272--283. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Minsam Ko, Seungwoo Choi, Koji Yatani, and Uichin Lee. 2016. Lock n’ LoL: Group-based Limiting Assistance App to Mitigate Smartphone Distractions in Group Activities. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 998--1010. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Minsam Ko, Subin Yang, Joonwon Lee, Christian Heizmann, Jinyoung Jeong, Uichin Lee, Daehee Shin, Koji Yatani, Junehwa Song, and Kyong-Mee Chung. 2015. NUGU: A Group-based Intervention App for Improving Self-regulation of Limiting Smartphone Use. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing. ACM, 1235--1245. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jon A. Krosnick and Stanley Presser. 2010. Question and Questionnaire Design. Handbook of Survey Research (2010).Google Scholar
- Jeffrey H Kuznekoff and Scott Titsworth. 2013. The Impact of Mobile Phone Usage on Student Learning. Communication Education 62, 3 (2013), 233--252.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kehbuma Langmia and Amy Glass. 2014. Coping with Smart Phone’Distractions’ in a College Classroom. Teaching Journalism 8 Mass Communication 4, 1 (2014), 13.Google Scholar
- Uichin Lee, Hyanghong Kang, Eunhee Yi, Mun Yi, and Jussi Kantola. 2012. Understanding Mobile Q8A Usage: An Exploratory Study. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3215--3224. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Uichin Lee, Jihyoung Kim, Eunhee Yi, Juyup Sung, and Mario Gerla. 2013. Analyzing Crowd Workers in Mobile Pay-for-answer Q8a. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 533--542. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Uichin Lee, Joonwon Lee, Minsam Ko, Changhun Lee, Yuhwan Kim, Subin Yang, Koji Yatani, Gahgene Gweon, Kyong-Mee Chung, and Junehwa Song. 2014. Hooked on Smartphones: An Exploratory Study on Smartphone Overuse Among College Students. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2327--2336. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yeoreum Lee and Youn-kyung Lim. 2015. Understanding the Roles and Influences of Mediators from Multiple Social Channels for Health Behavior Change. In Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing. ACM, 1070--1079. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Laura E Levine, Bradley M Waite, and Laura L Bowman. 2012. Mobile Media Use, Multitasking and Distractibility. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning 2, 3 (2012), 15--29.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vivien KG Lim. 2002. The IT Way of Loafing on the Job: Cyberloafing, Neutralizing and Organizational Justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior 23, 5 (2002), 675--694.Google ScholarCross Ref
- William Littlewood. 1996. fiAutonomyfi: An Anatomy and A Framework. System 24, 4 (1996), 427--435.Google Scholar
- Roberto Llorente and Maria Morant. 2014. Wearable Computers and Big Data: Interaction Paradigms for Knowledge Building in Higher Education. In Innovation and Teaching Technologies. Springer, 127--137.Google Scholar
- Markus Löchtefeld, Matthias Böhmer, and Lyubomir Ganev. 2013. AppDetox: Helping Users with Mobile App Addiction. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. ACM, 43. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Danielle Lottridge, Eli Marschner, Ellen Wang, Maria Romanovsky, and Clifford Nass. 2012. Browser Design Impacts Multitasking. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 56. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 1957--1961.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Arnold M. Lund. 2001. Measuring Usability with the USE Questionnaire. STC Usability SIG Newsletter 8, 2 (2001), 3--6.Google Scholar
- Roberto Martinez-Maldonado, Andrew Clayphan, Christopher Ackad, and Judy Kay. 2014. Multi-touch Technology in a Higher-education Classroom: Lessons In-the-wild. In Proceedings of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: The Future of Design. ACM, 220--229. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Richard E Mayer and Roxana Moreno. 2003. Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational psychologist 38, 1 (2003), 43--52.Google Scholar
- Beth E Meyerowitz and Shelly Chaiken. 1987. The Effect of Message Framing on Breast Self-examination Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52, 3 (1987), 500.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kimberly J Mitchell, David Finkelhor, and Janis Wolak. 2005. Protecting Youth Online: Family Use of Filtering and Blocking Software. Child Abuse 8 Neglect 29, 7 (2005), 753--765.Google Scholar
- Eyal Ophir, Clifford Nass, and Anthony D Wagner. 2009. Cognitive Control in Media Multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, 37 (2009), 15583--15587.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Antti Oulasvirta, Tye Rattenbury, Lingyi Ma, and Eeva Raita. 2012. Habits Make Smartphone Use More Pervasive. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 16, 1 (Jan. 2012), 105--114. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Viktoria Pammer and Marina Bratic. 2013. Surprise, Surprise: Activity Log Based Time Analytics for Time Management. In CHI’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 211--216. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chunjong Park, Junsung Lim, Juho Kim, Sung-Ju Lee, and Dongman Lee. 2017. “Don’t Bother me. I’m Socializing!”: Breakpoint-Based Smartphone Notification System. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing (CSCW ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sangkeun Park, Yongsung Kim, Uichin Lee, and Mark Ackerman. 2014. Understanding Localness of Knowledge Sharing: A Study of Naver KiN ’Here’. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices 8 Services (MobileHCI ’14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 13--22. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thiraput Pitichat. 2013. Smartphones in the Workplace: Changing Organizational Behavior, Transforming the Future. LUX: A Journal of Transdisciplinary Writing and Research from Claremont Graduate University 3, 1 (2013), 13.Google Scholar
- SM Ravizza, MG Uitvlugt, and KM Fenn. 2017. The Negative Effects of Laptop Internet Use During Class. Neuroscience Letters 637 (2017), 44--49.Google Scholar
- Faria Sana, Tina Weston, and Nicholas J Cepeda. 2013. Laptop Multitasking Hinders Classroom Learning for Both Users and Nearby Peers. Computers 8 Education 62 (2013), 24--31.Google Scholar
- Michael Savic, David Best, Simone Rodda, and Dan I Lubman. 2013. Exploring the Focus and Experiences of Smartphone Applications for Addiction Recovery. Journal of Addictive Diseases 32, 3 (2013), 310--319.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bill N. Schilit, Norman Adams, and Roy Want. 1994. Context-Aware Computing Applications. In Proceedings of the 1994 First Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (WMCSA ’94). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 85--90. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P Wesley Schultz, Jessica M Nolan, Robert B Cialdini, Noah J Goldstein, and Vladas Griskevicius. 2007. The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms. Psychological Science 18, 5 (2007), 429--434.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jaemyung Shin, Bumsoo Kang, Taiwoo Park, Jina Huh, Jinhan Kim, and Junehwa Song. 2016. BeUpright: Posture Correction Using Relational Norm Intervention. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 6040--6052. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hila J Spear and Pamela Kulbok. 2004. Autonomy and Adolescence: A Concept Analysis. Public Health Nursing 21, 2 (2004), 144--152.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Frederick Tesch, Donna Coelho, and Ronald Drozdenko. 2011. We Have Met the Enemy And He Is Us: Relative Potencies of Classroom Distractions. Business Education Innovation Journal 3, 2 (2011).Google Scholar
- Jelte Timmer, Linda Kool, and Rinie van Est. 2015. Ethical Challenges in Emerging Applications of Persuasive Technology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Persuasive Technology. Springer, 196--201.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Deborah R Tindell and Robert W Bohlander. 2012. The Use and Abuse of Cell Phones and Text Messaging in the Classroom: A survey of College Students. College Teaching 60, 1 (2012), 1--9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kristian Torning and Harri Oinas-Kukkonen. 2009. Persuasive System Design: State of the Art and Future Directions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Persuasive Technology. ACM, 30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tammy Toscos, Anne Faber, Shunying An, and Mona Praful Gandhi. 2006. Chick Clique: Persuasive Technology to Motivate Teenage Girls to Exercise. In CHI’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1873--1878. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tammy Toscos, Anne Faber, Kay Connelly, and Adity Mutsuddi Upoma. 2008. Encouraging Physical Activity in Teens Can Technology Help Reduce Barriers to Physical Activity in Adolescent Girls?. In Proceedings of International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. IEEE, 218--221.Google Scholar
- Fang-Yi Flora Wei and Y Ken Wang. 2010. Students’ Silent Messages: Can Teacher Verbal and Nonverbal Immediacy Moderate Student Use of Text Messaging in Class? Communication Education 59, 4 (2010), 475--496.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark Weiser. 1991. The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American 265, 3 (1991), 94--104.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christopher D Wickens, Justin G Hollands, Simon Banbury, and Raja Parasuraman. 2015. Engineering Psychology 8 Human Performance. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Jaime AB Wilson, Kristin Onorati, Matt Mishkind, Mark A Reger, and Gregory A Gahm. 2008. Soldier Attitudes about Technology-based Approaches to Mental Health Care. CyberPsychology 8 Behavior 11, 6 (2008), 767--769.Google Scholar
- Eileen Wood, Lucia Zivcakova, Petrice Gentile, Karin Archer, Domenica De Pasquale, and Amanda Nosko. 2012. Examining the Impact of Off-task Multi-tasking with Technology on Real-time Classroom Learning. Computers 8 Education 58, 1 (2012), 365--374. Google ScholarDigital Library
- YanXiang Zhang and ZiQiang Zhu. 2016. Interactive Spatial AR for Classroom Teaching. In International Conference on Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Computer Graphics. Springer, 463--470.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Let’s FOCUS: Mitigating Mobile Phone Use in College Classrooms
Recommendations
Let's start "flipping" (the classroom)
In the "flipped classroom" the instructor offloads passive lecture content to homework outside the classroom, creating additional time in the classroom for active and higher level learning. Students watch "lecture" videos for homework, at their own pace,...
Let us read together: Development and evaluation of a computer-assisted reciprocal early English reading system
This study attempts to implement a cooperative reading environment for EFL early reading using a mobile-device-supported computer-assisted reciprocal early English reading (CAREER) system, and to evaluate its effect on the early reading skills and ...
Measuring and prioritising value of mobile phone usage
The purpose of this research is to measure and prioritise the value of mobile phone usage using employees' perspectives. The Content analysis method and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) were adopted to collect and analyse data. According to the ...
Comments