skip to main content
10.1145/3131542.3131562acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiotConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Providing privacy, safety, and security in IoT-based transactive energy systems using distributed ledgers

Published:22 October 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Power grids are undergoing major changes due to rapid growth in renewable energy resources and improvements in battery technology. While these changes enhance sustainability and efficiency, they also create significant management challenges as the complexity of power systems increases. To tackle these challenges, decentralized Internet-of-Things (IoT) solutions are emerging, which arrange local communities into transactive microgrids. Within a transactive microgrid, "prosumers" (i.e., consumers with energy generation and storage capabilities) can trade energy with each other, thereby smoothing the load on the main grid using local supply. It is hard, however, to provide security, safety, and privacy in a decentralized and transactive energy system. On the one hand, prosumers' personal information must be protected from their trade partners and the system operator. On the other hand, the system must be protected from careless or malicious trading, which could destabilize the entire grid. This paper describes Privacy-preserving Energy Transactions (PETra), which is a secure and safe solution for transactive microgrids that enables consumers to trade energy without sacrificing their privacy. PETra builds on distributed ledgers, such as blockchains, and provides anonymity for communication, bidding, and trading.

References

  1. 2017. US Solar Market Insight. (2017). http://www.seia.org/research-resources/us-solar-market-insight.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. George Bissias, A Pinar Ozisik, Brian N Levine, and Marc Liberatore. 2014. Sybil-resistant mixing for Bitcoin. In Proc. of 13th Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society. ACM, 149--158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Miguel Castro and Barbara Liskov. 1999. Practical Byzantine fault tolerance. In Proc. of 3rd Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI). 173--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Steven E Collier. 2017. The emerging Enernet: Convergence of the smart grid with the internet of things. IEEE Industry Applications Magazine 23, 2 (2017), 12--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. O. Dag and B. Mirafzal. 2016. On stability of islanded low-inertia microgrids. In Proc. of 2016 Clemson University Power Systems Conference (PSC). 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Costas Efthymiou and Georgios Kalogridis. 2010. Smart grid privacy via anonymization of smart metering data. In Proc. of 1st IEEE International Conf. on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm). IEEE, 238--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Scott Eisele, Abhishek Dubey, Gabor Karsai, and Srdjan Lukic. 2017a. Transactive Energy Demo with RIAPS Platform. In Proc. of 8th International Conference on Cyber Physical Systems. 91--91. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Scott Eisele, Istvan Madari, Abhishek Dubey, and Gabor Karsai. 2017b. RIAPS: Resilient Information Architecture Platform for Decentralized Smart Systems. In Proc. of 20th IEEE International Symposium on Real-Time Computing. IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Erich W Gunther. 2016. Smart Grid Interoperability Standards. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Haider Tarish Haider, Ong Hang See, and Wilfried Elmenreich. 2016. A review of residential demand response of smart grid. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 59 (2016), 166 -- 178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Hyperledger. 2017. The Fabric Model. http://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/latest/fabric_model.html. (2017). Accessed: April 24th, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Srinivas Katipamula, Jereme Haack, George Hernandez, Bora Akyol, and Joseph Hagerman. 2016. VOLTTRON: An Open-Source Software Platform of the Future. IEEE Electrification Magazine 4, 4 (2016), 15--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Koen Kok and Steve Widergren. 2016. A society of devices: Integrating intelligent distributed resources with transactive energy. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine 14, 3 (2016), 34--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. L. Kristov, P. De Martini, and J. D. Taft. 2016. A Tale of Two Visions: Designing a Decentralized Transactive Electric System. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine 14, 3 (May 2016), 63--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Patrick McDaniel and Stephen McLaughlin. 2009. Security and privacy challenges in the smart grid. IEEE Security & Privacy 7, 3 (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ronald B Melton. 2013. Gridwise transactive energy framework (draft version). Technical Report. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ian Miers, Christina Garman, Matthew Green, and Aviel D Rubin. 2013. Zerocoin: Anonymous distributed e-cash from Bitcoin. In Proc. of 2013 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (S&P). IEEE, 397--411. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Farrokh A Rahimi and Ali Ipakchi. 2012. Transactive energy techniques: closing the gap between wholesale and retail markets. The Electricity Journal 25, 8 (2012), 29--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. S Raj Rajagopalan, Lalitha Sankar, Soheil Mohajer, and H Vincent Poor. 2011. Smart meter privacy: A utility-privacy framework. In Proc. of 2nd IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm). IEEE, 190--195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Tom Randall. 2015. The way humans get electricity is about to change forever. Bloomberg. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Michael G Reed, Paul F Syverson, and David M Goldschlag. 1998. Anonymous connections and onion routing. IEEE Journal on Selected areas in Communications 16, 4 (1998), 482--494. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Tim Ruffing, Pedro Moreno-Sanchez, and Aniket Kate. 2014. CoinShuffle: Practical decentralized coin mixing for Bitcoin. In 19th European Symposium on Research in Computer Security (ESORICS). Springer, 345--364. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Lalitha Sankar, S Raj Rajagopalan, and Soheil Mohajer. 2013. Smart meter privacy: A theoretical framework. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 4, 2 (2013), 837--846.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. E. Santacana, G. Rackliffe, L. Tang, and X. Feng. 2010. Getting Smart. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine 8, 2 (March 2010), 41--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Onur Tan, Deniz Gunduz, and H Vincent Poor. 2013. Increasing smart meter privacy through energy harvesting and storage devices. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 31, 7 (2013), 1331--1341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. David Varodayan and Ashish Khisti. 2011. Smart meter privacy using a rechargeable battery: Minimizing the rate of information leakage. In Proc. of 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 1932--1935.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    IoT '17: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on the Internet of Things
    October 2017
    211 pages
    ISBN:9781450353182
    DOI:10.1145/3131542

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 October 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate28of84submissions,33%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader