skip to main content
10.1145/3132847.3132863acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Bringing Salary Transparency to the World: Computing Robust Compensation Insights via LinkedIn Salary

Published:06 November 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

The recently launched LinkedIn Salary product has been designed with the goal of providing compensation insights to the world's professionals and thereby helping them optimize their earning potential. We describe the overall design and architecture of the statistical modeling system underlying this product. We focus on the unique data mining challenges while designing and implementing the system, and describe the modeling components such as Bayesian hierarchical smoothing that help to compute and present robust compensation insights to users. We report on extensive evaluation with nearly one year of de-identified compensation data collected from over one million LinkedIn users, thereby demonstrating the efficacy of the statistical models. We also highlight the lessons learned through the deployment of our system at LinkedIn.

References

  1. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, volume 2, chapter Non-Response Bias. Academic Press, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. BLS Handbook of Methods, chapter 3, Occupational Employment Statistics. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2008. http://www.bls.gov/opub/hom/pdf/homch3.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. NIST/SEMATECH e-Handbook of Statistical Methods. National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. How to rethink the candidate experience and make better hires. CareerBuilder's Candidate Behavior Study, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Job seeker nation study. Jobvite, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Glassdoor introduces salary estimates in job listings, February 2017. https://www.glassdoor.com/press/glassdoor-introduces-salary-estimates-job-listings-reveals-unfilled-jobs-272-billion/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Overview of BLS statistics on pay and benefits, February 2017. https://www.bls.gov/bls/wages.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Payscale data & methodology, February 2017. http://www.payscale.com/docs/default-source/pdf/data_one_pager.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. D. Agarwal, R. Agrawal, R. Khanna, and N. Kota. Estimating rates of rare events with multiple hierarchies through scalable log linear models. In KDD, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Bethlehem. Selection bias in web surveys. International Statistical Review, 78(2), 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. M. Callegaro, K. L. Manfreda, and V. Vehovar. Web survey methodology. Sage, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. A. Duerr and S. K. Kancha. Bringing salary transparency to the world. LinkedIn Engineering Blog, 2016. https://engineering.linkedin.com/blog/2016/10/bringing-salary-transparency-to-the-world.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. R. T. Fielding. Architectural styles and the design of network-based software architectures. PhD thesis, University of California, Irvine, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. R. M. Groves, F. J. Fowler Jr, M. P. Couper, J. M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. Survey methodology. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Harris. How to make the job market work like a supermarket. LinkedIn Pulse, 2016. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-make-job-market-work-like-supermarket-seth-harris.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. M. Hubert and E. Vandervieren. An adjusted boxplot for skewed distributions. Computational statistics & data analysis, 52(12), 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. R. J. Jessen. Statistical survey techniques. John Wiley & Sons, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. K. Kenthapadi, A. Chudhary, and S. Ambler. LinkedIn Salary: A system for secure collection and presentation of structured compensation insights to job seekers. In IEEE PAC, 2017. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.06976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M. Pinkovskiy and X. Sala-i Martin. Parametric estimations of the world distribution of income, 2009. Working Paper No. 15433, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. R. Sandler. Introducing LinkedIn Salary?: Unlock your earning potential. LinkedIn Blog, 2016. https://blog.linkedin.com/2016/11/02/introducing-linkedin-salary-unlock-your-earning-potential.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. R. Sumbaly, J. Kreps, L. Gao, A. Feinberg, C. Soman, and S. Shah. Serving largescale batch computed data with project Voldemort. In FAST, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. J. Weiner. The future of LinkedIn and the Economic Graph. LinkedIn Pulse, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. L. Zhang and D. Agarwal. Fast computation of posterior mode in multi-level hierarchical models. In NIPS, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Bringing Salary Transparency to the World: Computing Robust Compensation Insights via LinkedIn Salary

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader