skip to main content
research-article

Opportunistic Spectrum Allocation for Interference Mitigation Amongst Coexisting Wireless Body Area Networks

Published:21 July 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs) are seen as the enabling technology for developing new generations of medical applications, such as remote health monitoring. As such it is expected that WBANs will predominantly transport mission-critical and delay sensitive data. A key strategy towards building a reliable WBAN is to ensure such networks are highly immune to interference. To achieve this, new and intelligent wireless spectrum allocation strategies are required not only to avoid interference, but also to make best-use of the limited available spectrum. This article presents a new spectrum allocation scheme referred to as Smart Channel Assignment (SCA), which maximizes the resource usage and transmission speed by deploying a partially-orthogonal channel assignment scheme between coexisting WBANs as well as offering a convenient tradeoff among spectral reuse efficiency, transmission rate, and outage. Detailed analytical studies verify that the proposed SCA strategy is robust to variations in channel conditions, increase in sensor node-density within each WBAN, and an increase in number of coexisting WBANs.

References

  1. ABI research: Wearable computing devices, like apples iWatch, will exceed 485 million annual shipments by 2018. Retrieved from https://www.abiresearch.com/press/wearable-computing-devices-like-apples-iwatch-will.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks Part 15.6: Wireless Body Area Networks. IEEE Std 802.15.6-2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Karen I. Aardal, Stan P. M. Van Hoesel, Arie M. C. A. Koster, Carlo Mannino, and Antonio Sassano. 2007. Models and solution techniques for frequency assignment problems. Ann. Operat. Res. 153, 1 (2007), 79--129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Muhammad Mahtab Alam and Elyes Ben Hamida. 2015. Interference mitigation and coexistence strategies in ieee 802.15. 6 based wearable body-to-body networks. In Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks. Springer, 665--677.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Dhafer Ben Arbia, Muhammad Mahtab Alam, Rabah Attia, and Elyes Ben Hamida. 2015. Behavior of wireless body-to-body networks routing strategies for public protection and disaster relief. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob’15). IEEE, 117--124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Sabin Bhandari and Sangman Moh. 2015. A survey of MAC protocols for cognitive radio body area networks. Sensors 15, 4 (2015), 9189--9209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. Cheng and C. Huang. 2013. Coloring-based inter-WBAN scheduling for mobile wireless body area network. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 24, 2 (2013), 250--259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Simon L. Cotton and William G. Scanlon. 2009. Channel characterization for single-and multiple-antenna wearable systems used for indoor body-to-body communications. IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propagat. 57, 4 (2009), 980--990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Buddhika de Silva, Anirudh Natarajan, and Mehul Motani. 2009. Inter-user interference in body sensor networks: Preliminary investigation and an infrastructure-based solution. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, 2009 (BSN’09). IEEE, 35--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jie Dong and David Smith. 2012. Cooperative body-area-communications: Enhancing coexistence without coordination between networks. In Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC’12). 2269--2274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Jie Dong and David Smith. 2013. Opportunistic relaying in wireless body area networks: Coexistence performance. In International Conference on Communications (ICC). IEEE, 5613--5618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Andreas Eisenblätter and others. 2001. Frequency Assignment in GSM Networks: Models, Heuristics, and Lower Bounds. Cuvillier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Jocelyne Elias, Stefano Paris, and Marwan Krunz. 2015a. Cross technology interference mitigation in body area networks: An optimization approach. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 64, 9 (2015), 4144--4157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Jocelyne Elias, Stefano Paris, and Marwan Krunz. 2015b. Cross-technology interference mitigation in body area networks: An optimization approach. IEEE Trans. Vehic. Technol. 64, 9 (2015), 4144--4157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Gengfa Fang, Eryk Dutkiewicz, Kegen Yu, Rein Vesilo, and Yiwei Yu. 2010. Distributed inter-network interference coordination for wireless body area networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM’10). 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Laura Marie Feeney and Viktoria Fodor. 2016. Reliability in co-located 802.15. 4 personal area networks. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Workshop on Pervasive Wireless Healthcare. ACM, 5--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Paolo Roberto Grassi, Vincenzo Rana, Ivan Beretta, and Donatella Sciuto. 2012. BIRS: A technique to reduce BAN-BAN interferences in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN’12). IEEE, 46--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Yoonjeong Han, Zilong Jin, Jinsung Cho, and Tae-Seong Kim. 2014. A prediction algorithm for coexistence problem in multiple WBANs environment. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Zilong Jin, Yoonjeong Han, Jinsung Cho, and Ben Lee. 2015. A prediction algorithm for coexistence problem in multiple-WBAN environment. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 11, 3 (2015), 386842. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Norihiko Katayama, Kenichi Takizawa, Takahiro Aoyagi, Jun-ichi Takada, Li Huan-Bang, and Ryuji Kohno. 2009. Channel model on various frequency bands for wearable body area network. IEICE Trans. Commun. 92, 2 (2009), 418--424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ramtin Kazemi, Rein Vesilo, Eryk Dutkiewicz, and Gengfa Fang. 2010. Inter-network interference mitigation in wireless body area networks using power control games. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT’10). IEEE, 81--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ramtin Kazemi, Rein Vesilo, Eryk Dutkiewicz, and Ren Liu. 2011a. Dynamic power control in wireless body area networks using reinforcement learning with approximation. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC’11). IEEE, 2203--2208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Ramtin Kazemi, Rein Vesilo, Eryk Dutkiewicz, and Ren Liu. 2011b. Dynamic power control in wireless body area networks using reinforcement learning with approximation. In Proceedings of the IEEE 22nd International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC’11). IEEE, 2203--2208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Imdad Khan, Yuriy I. Nechayev, Khalida Ghanem, and Peter S. Hall. 2010. BAN-BAN interference rejection with multiple antennas at the receiver. IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propagat. 58, 3 (2010), 927--934.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Benoît Latré, Bart Braem, Ingrid Moerman, Chris Blondia, and Piet Demeester. 2011. A survey on wireless body area networks. Wireless Netw. 17, 1 (2011), 1--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Thien T. T. Le and Sangman Moh. 2015. Interference mitigation schemes for wireless body area sensor networks: A comparative survey. Sensors 15, 6 (2015), 13805--13838.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Amira Meharouech, Jocelyne Elias, Stefano Paris, and Ahmed Mehaoua. 2014. Socially-aware interference mitigation game in body-to-body networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on NETwork Games, COntrol and OPtimization (NETGCOOP’14).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Samaneh Movassaghi, Mehran Abolhasan, Justin Lipman, David Smith, and Abbas Jamalipour. 2014c. Wireless body area networks: A survey. IEEE Communication Surveys Tutorials 16, 3 (March 2014), 1658--1686.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Samaneh Movassaghi, Mehran Abolhasan, and B. Smith David. 2014a. Cooperative scheduling with graph coloring for interference mitigation in wireless body area networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (WCNC’14). IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Samaneh Movassaghi, Mehran Abolhasan, and B. Smith David. 2014b. Smart spectrum allocation for interference mitigation in wireless body area networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC’14). IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Samaneh Movassaghi, Mehran Abolhasan, B. Smith David, and Abbas Jamalipour. 2014d. AIM: Adaptive internetwork interference mitigation amongst co-existing wireless body area networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Globlal Communications Conference (GC’14). IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. S. Movassaghi, P. Arab, and M. Abolhasan. 2012. Wireless technologies for body area networks: Characteristics and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies (ISCIT’12). 42--47.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Anirudh Natarajan, Mehul Motani, Buddhika de Silva, Kok-Kiong Yap, and Kee Chaing Chua. 2007. Investigating network architectures for body sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGMOBILE International Workshop on Systems and Networking Support for Healthcare and Assisted Living Environments. ACM, 19--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Yinyue Qiu, David Haley, Terence Chan, and Linda Davis. 2016. Game theoretic framework for studying WBAN coexistence: 2-player game analysis and n-player game estimation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Australian Communications Theory Workshop (AusCTW’16). IEEE, 53--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Deepak Kumar Rout and Susmita Das. 2014. Interference mitigation in wireless body area networks using modified and modulated mhp. Wireless Pers. Commun. 77, 2 (2014), 1343--1361. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. David B. Smith and Leif W. Hanlen. 2015. Channel modeling for wireless body area networks. In Ultra-Low-Power Short-Range Radios. Springer International Publishing, 25--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. David B. Smith, Dino Miniutti, and Leif W. Hanlen. 2011. Characterization of the body-area propagation channel for monitoring a subject sleeping. IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propagat. 59, 11 (2011), 4388--4392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Wen Sun, Yu Ge, and Wai-Choong Wong. 2013. A lightweight distributed scheme for mitigating inter-user interference in body sensor networks. Comput. Netw. 57, 18 (2013), 3885--3896. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Sana Ullah and Kyung Sup Kwak. 2012a. An ultra low-power and traffic-adaptive medium access control protocol for wireless body area network. J. Med. Syst. 36, 3 (2012), 1021--1030. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Sana Ullah and Kyung Sup Kwak. 2012b. An ultra low-power and traffic-adaptive medium access control protocol for wireless body area network. J. Med. Syst. 36, 3 (June 2012), 1021--1030. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Lusheng Wang, Claire Goursaud, Navid Nikaein, Laura Cottatellucci, and J. Gorce. 2013. Cooperative scheduling for coexisting body area networks. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 12, 1 (2013), 123--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Xuan Wang and Lin Cai. 2011. Interference analysis of co-existing wireless body area networks. In Proceedings of the Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM’11). IEEE, 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhijun Xie, Guangyan Huang, Jing He, and Yanchun Zhang. 2014. A clique-based WBAN scheduling for mobile wireless body area networks. Procedia Computer Science 31 (2014), 1092--1101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Wen-Bin Yang and Kamran Sayrafian-Pour. 2011. Interference mitigation for body area networks. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC). IEEE, 2193--2197.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Ehsan Tabatabaei Yazdi, Andreas Willig, and Krzysztof Pawlikowski. 2014. Frequency adaptation for interference mitigation in IEEE 802.15. 4-based mobile body sensor networks. Computer Communications 53 (2014), 102--119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Zhaoyang Zhang, Honggang Wang, Chonggang Wang, and Hua Fang. 2013. Interference mitigation for cyber-physical wireless body area network system using social networks. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 1, 1 (2013), 121--132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. G. Zhou, H. Wang, D. T. Nguyen, Z. Ren, and X. Qi. 2016. Throughput assurance for multiple body sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 27, 2 (2016), 546--557. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Opportunistic Spectrum Allocation for Interference Mitigation Amongst Coexisting Wireless Body Area Networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
        ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 14, Issue 2
        May 2018
        275 pages
        ISSN:1550-4859
        EISSN:1550-4867
        DOI:10.1145/3203093
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 July 2018
        • Revised: 1 October 2017
        • Accepted: 1 October 2017
        • Received: 1 May 2016
        Published in tosn Volume 14, Issue 2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader