skip to main content
extended-abstract

Distributed Lagrangian Method for Tie-Line Scheduling in Power Grids under Uncertainty

Published:11 October 2017Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

System operators (SOs) manage the grid and its assets in different parts (areas) of an interconnected power network. One would ideally seek to co-optimize the grid assets across multiple areas by solving a centralized optimization problem. Gathering the dispatch cost structures and the network constraints from all areas for a centralized solution remains difficult due to technical, historical, and sometimes legal barriers. Motivated by the need for a distributed solution architecture for multi-area power systems, we propose a distributed Lagrangian algorithm in this paper.We establish convergence rates for our algorithm that solves the deterministic tie-line scheduling problem as well as its robust variant (with policy space approximations). Our algorithm does not need any form of central coordination. We illustrate its efficacy on IEEE test systems.

References

  1. A. Beck, A. Nedi?, A. Ozdaglar, and M. Teboulle. 2014. An O(1/k) Gradient Method for Network Resource Allocation Problems. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems 1, 1 (March 2014), 64--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A. Ben-Tal, L. E. Ghaoui, and A. Nemirovski. 2009. Robust Optimization. Princeton Univ. Press, NJ, Princeton.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Bertsekas. 1999. Nonlinear Programming: 2nd Edition. Cambridge, MA: Athena Scientific.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. T. T. Doan and C. L. Beck. 2017. Distributed Lagrangian Methods for Network Resource Allocation. To appear in 1st IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications. Kohala Coast, Hawaii. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Falsone, K. Margellos, S. Garatti, and M. Prandini. 2016. Distributed constrained convex optimization and consensus via dual decomposition and proximal minimization. In 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). 1889--1894.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Y. Guo, L. Tong, W. Wu, B. Zhang, and H. Sun. 2017. Coordinated Multi-area Economic Dispatch via Critical Region Projection. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems PP, 99 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Y. Ji and L. Tong. 2016. Multi-proxy interchange scheduling under uncertainty. In 2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM). 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. B. H. Kim and R. Baldick. 1997. Coarse-grained distributed optimal power flow. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 12, 2 (May 1997), 932--939.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. X. Lai, L. Xie, Q. Xia, H. Zhong, and C. Kang. 2015. Decentralized Multi-Area Economic Dispatch via Dynamic Multiplier-Based Lagrangian Relaxation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 30, 6 (Nov 2015), 3225--3233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Z. Li, W. Wu, B. Zhang, and B. Wang. 2016. Decentralized Multi-Area Dynamic Economic Dispatch Using Modified Generalized Benders Decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 31, 1 (Jan 2016), 526--538.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Brian Stott, Jorge Jardim, and Ongun Alsaç. 2009. DC power flow revisited. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 24, 3 (2009), 1290--1300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. M. White and R. Pike. 2011. ISO New England Ad New York ISO Inter-regional Interchange Scheduling: Analysis and Options. (Jan. 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. T. Yang, J. Lu, D. Wu, J. Wu, G. Shi, Z. Meng, and K. H. Johansson. 2016. A Distributed Algorithm for Economic Dispatch over Time-Varying Directed Networks with Delays. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics PP, 99 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Distributed Lagrangian Method for Tie-Line Scheduling in Power Grids under Uncertainty
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
      ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review  Volume 45, Issue 2
      Setember 2017
      131 pages
      ISSN:0163-5999
      DOI:10.1145/3152042
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2017 Authors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 October 2017

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader