skip to main content
10.1145/3154862.3154875acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespervasivehealthConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Experts get me started, peers keep me going: comparing crowd- versus expert-designed motivational text messages for exercise behavior change

Published:23 May 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a comparative analysis of motivational messages designed with a theory-driven approach. A previous study [4] involved crowdsourcing to design and evaluate motivational text messages for physical activity, and showed that these peer-designed text messages aligned to behavior change strategies from theory. However, the messages were predominantly rated as motivating in the later stages of behavior change, not in the earlier stages, including those strategies intended for the earlier stages. We speculated that the peers that designed the messages aligned to the strategies did not have sufficient expertise to motivate people in earlier stages. Therefore, we replicated the study with experts. We found that for two of the strategies expert-designed messages were found more motivating in the earliest stage, while for several of the strategies peer-designed messages were rated more motivating for later stages. We conclude that when using these strategies in behavior change technology, expert-designed messages could be more motivating in the earliest stage, while peer-designed messages could be more motivating in the later stages.

References

  1. Douglas Bates, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1 (2015), 1--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Heather L Coley, Rajani S Sadasivam, Jessica H Williams, Julie E Volkman, Yu-Mei Schoenberger, Connie L Kohler, Heather Sobko, Midge N Ray, Jeroan J Allison, Daniel E Ford, Gregg H Gilbert, and Thomas K Houston. 2013. Crowdsourced peer- versus expert-written smoking-cessation messages. American journal of preventive medicine 45, 5 (Nov. 2013), 543--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. David B. Dahl. 2016. xtable: Export Tables to LaTeX or HTML. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=xtable R package version 1.8--2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Roelof A. J. de Vries, Khiet P. Truong, Sigrid Kwint, Constance H C Drossaert, and Vanessa Evers. 2016. Crowd-Designed Motivation: Motivational Messages for Exercise Adherence Based on Behavior Change Theory. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 297--308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Andy Field. 2013. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Eric B. Hekler, Predrag Klasnja, Jon E. Froehlich, and Matthew P. Buman. 2013. Mind the Theoretical Gap: Interpreting, Using, and Developing Behavioral Theory in HCI Research. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3307--3316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Setia Hermawati and Glyn Lawson. 2014. Managing obesity through mobile phone applications: a state-of-the-art review from a user-centred design perspective. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing (2014), 1--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Maurits Kaptein, Boris De Ruyter, Panos Markopoulos, and Emile Aarts. 2012. Adaptive persuasive systems: a study of tailored persuasive text messages to reduce snacking. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 2, 2 (2012), 10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Catriona M Kennedy, John Powell, Thomas H Payne, John Ainsworth, Alan Boyd, and Iain Buchan. 2012. Active assistance technology for health-related behavior change: an interdisciplinary review. Journal of medical Internet research 14, 3 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jeffrey Kristan and Brian Suffoletto. 2015. Using online crowdsourcing to understand young adult attitudes toward expert-authored messages aimed at reducing hazardous alcohol consumption and to collect peer-authored messages. Translational behavioral medicine 5, 1 (2015), 45--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Alexandra Kuznetsova, Per Bruun Brockhoff, and Rune Haubo Bojesen Christensen. 2016. lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest R package version 2.0--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J Richard Landis and Gary G Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics (1977), 159--174.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Patrick WC Lau, Erica Y Lau, Del P Wong, and Lynda Ransdell. 2011. A systematic review of information and communication technology-based interventions for promoting physical activity behavior change in children and adolescents. Journal of medical Internet research 13, 3 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Bess H Marcus, Beth C Bock, Bernardine M Pinto, Leigh Ann H Forsyth, Mary B Roberts, and Regina M Traficante. 1998. Efficacy of an individualized, motivationally-tailored physical activity intervention. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 20, 3 (1998), 174--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Bess H Marcus, Joseph S Rossi, Vanessa C Selby, Raymond S Niaura, and David B Abrams. 1992a. The stages and processes of exercise adoption and maintenance in a worksite sample. Health Psychology 11, 6 (1992), 386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Bess H Marcus, Vanessa C Selby, Raymond S Niaura, and Joseph S Rossi. 1992b. Self-efficacy and the stages of exercise behavior change. Research quarterly for exercise and sport 63, 1 (1992), 60--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Susan Michie, Marie Johnston, Jill Francis, Wendy Hardeman, and Martin Eccles. 2008. From Theory to Intervention: Mapping Theoretically Derived Behavioural Determinants to Behaviour Change Techniques. Applied Psychology 57, 4 (2008), 660--680.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Adity U Mutsuddi and Kay Connelly. 2012. Text messages for encouraging physical activity Are they effective after the novelty effect wears off?. In Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), 2012 6th International Conference on. IEEE, 33--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Kevin Patrick, Fred Raab, Marc A Adams, Lindsay Dillon, Marian Zabinski, Cheryl L Rock, William G Griswold, and Gregory J Norman. 2009. A text message-based intervention for weight loss: randomized controlled trial. Journal of medical Internet research 11, 1 (2009).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. James O Prochaska and Carlo C DiClemente. 1983. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 51, 3 (1983), 390--395.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. R Core Team. 2016. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Craig S Rosen. 2000. Is the sequencing of change processes by stage consistent across health problems? A meta-analysis. Health Psychology 19, 6 (2000), 593.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PervasiveHealth '17: Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare
    May 2017
    503 pages
    ISBN:9781450363631
    DOI:10.1145/3154862

    Copyright © 2017 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 23 May 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate55of116submissions,47%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader