skip to main content
research-article

A Product-Form Model for the Performance Evaluation of a Bandwidth Allocation Strategy in WSNs

Published:22 February 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) are important examples of Collective Adaptive System, which consist of a set of motes that are spatially distributed in an indoor or outdoor space. Each mote monitors its surrounding conditions, such as humidity, intensity of light, temperature, and vibrations, but also collects complex information, such as images or small videos, and cooperates with the whole set of motes forming the WSN to allow the routing process. The traffic in the WSN consists of packets that contain the data harvested by the motes and can be classified according to the type of information that they carry. One pivotal problem in WSNs is the bandwidth allocation among the motes. The problem is known to be challenging due to the reduced computational capacity of the motes, their energy consumption constraints, and the fully decentralised network architecture. In this article, we study a novel algorithm to allocate the WSN bandwidth among the motes by taking into account the type of traffic they aim to send. Under the assumption of a mesh network and Poisson distributed harvested packets, we propose an analytical model for its performance evaluation that allows a designer to study the optimal configuration parameters. Although the Markov chain underlying the model is not reversible, we show it to be ρ-reversible under a certain renaming of states. By an extensive set of simulations, we show that the analytical model accurately approximates the performance of networks that do not satisfy the assumptions. The algorithm is studied with respect to the achieved throughput and fairness. We show that it provides a good approximation of the max-min fairness requirements.

References

  1. I. F. Akyildiz and I. H. Kasimoglu. 2004. Wireless sensor and actor networks: research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw. 2, 4 (2004), 351--367.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. D. Bertsekas and R. Gallager. 1992. Data Networks. Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Caccamo, L. Y. Zhang, S. Lui, and G. Buttazzo. 2002. An implicit prioritized access protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS’02). 39--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. Cherian and T. R. G. Nair. 2014. Priority based bandwidth allocation in wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Comput. Netw. Commun. (IJCNC) 6, 6 (2014), 119--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. M. Chitnis, P. Pagano, G. Lipari, and Y Liang. 2009. A survey on bandwidth resource allocation and scheduling in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Network-Based Information Systems. 121--128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. G. Degirmenci, J. P. Kharoufeh, and R. O. Baldwin. 2013. On the performance evaluation of query-based wireless sensor networks. Perform. Eval. 70, 2 (2013), 124--147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. T. Ee and R. Bajcsy. 2004. Congestion control and fairness for many-to-one routing in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 148--161. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. Fagin and T. G. Price. 1978. Efficient calculation of expected miss ratios in the independent reference model. SIAM J. Comput. 7, 3 (1978), 288--297.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Feng, J. Hillston, and V. Galpin. 2016. Automatic moment-closure approximation of spatially distributed collective adaptive systems. ACM Trans. Model. Comput. Simul. 26, 4 (2016), 26:1--26:22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Frescha. 2015. Collective adaptive systems. In Proceedings of UBICOMP/ISWC’15 Adjunct. 893--895. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. E. Gelenbe and A. Marin. 2015. Interconnected wireless sensors with energy harvesting. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Analytical Stochastic Modelling Techniques and Applications (ASMTA’15). 87--99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. E. L. Hahne. 1991. Round-robin scheduling for max-min fairness in data networks. IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun. 9 (1991), 1024--1039. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Z. Hanzalek and P. Jurĉik. 2010. Energy efficient scheduling for cluster-tree wireless sensor networks with time-bounded data flows: Application to IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee. IEEE Trans. Industr. Informat. 6, 3 (Aug 2010), 438--450.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. T. He, J. A. Stankovic, C. Lu, and T. Abdelzaher. 2003. SPEED: A stateless protocol for real-time communication in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 23rd IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. 46--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. F. Kelly. 1979. Reversibility and Stochastic Networks. Wiley, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. Khan, B. Nefzi, L. Santinelli, and Y. Song. 2012. Probabilistic bandwidth assignment in wireless sensor networks. In Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7405. Springer, Berlin, 631--647.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. W. F. King. 1971. Analysis of paging algorithms. In Proceedings of the International Federation for Information Processing Congress (IFIP’71).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. R. Lopes Pereira, J. Trinidade, F. Goncalves, L. Suresh, D. Barbosa, and T. Vazao. 2014. A wireless sensor network for monitoring volcano-seismic signals. Nat. Haz. Earth Syst. Sci. 14 (2014), 3123--3142.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A. Mainwaring, D. Culler, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, and J. Anderson. 2002. Wireless sensor networks for habitat monitoring. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications. ACM, 88--97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A. Marin and S. Rossi. 2014a. On discrete time reversibility modulo state renaming and its applications. In Proceedings of the Conference on International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools (ValueTools’14). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. A. Marin and S. Rossi. 2014b. On the relations between lumpability and reversibility. In Proceedings of the IEEE 22nd International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS’14). 427--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. A. Marin and S. Rossi. 2016a. On the relations between Markov chain lumpability and reversibility. Acta Informat. (2016). Available online. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. A. Marin and S. Rossi. 2016b. Priority-based bandwidth allocation in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 9th EAI Proceedings of the International Conference on Performance Evaluation Methodologies and Tools (ValueTools’15). 137--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. R. Pan, B. Prabhakar, and K. Psounis. 2000. CHOKe, a stateless active queue management scheme for approximating fair bandwidth allocation. In Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM’00. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC, 942--951.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Y. Sankarasubramabiam, O. Akan, and I. Akyildiz. 2003. Event-to-sink reliable transport in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking 8 Computing (MobiHoc’03). 177--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. L. Tan and S. Tang. 2017. Energy harvesting wireless sensor node with temporal death: novel models and analyses. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 25, 2 (2017), 896--909. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. L. Tan and M. Wu. 2016. Data reduction in wireless sensor networks: a hierarchical LMS prediction approach. IEEE Sens. J. 16, 6 (2016), 1708--1715.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. L. Tan, Z. Zhu, F. Ge, and N. Xiong. 2015. Utility maximization resource allocation in wireless networks: Methods and algorithms. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybernet.: Syst. 45, 7 (2015), 101--1034.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. S. Tang and L. Tan. 2017. Reward rate maximization and optimal transmission policy of EH device with temporal death in EH-WSNs. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 16, 2 (2017), 1157--1167. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. M. Tschaikowski and M. Tribastone. 2017. Spatial fluid limits for stochastic mobile networks. Perform. Eval. 109 (2017), 52--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. C. Tunc and N. Akar. 2017. Markov fluid queue model of an energy harvesting IoT device with adaptive sensing. Perform. Eval. 111 (2017), 1--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. C. Wan, S. B. Eisenman, and A. T. Campbell. 2003. CODA: Congestion detection and avoidance in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 266--279. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. P. D. Welch. 1981. On the Problem of the Initial Transient in Steady-state Simulations. Technical Report. IBM Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. P. Whittle. 1986. Systems in Stochastic Equilibrium. John Wiley 8 Sons Ltd. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. A. Woo and D. E. Culler. 2001. A transmission control scheme for media access in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. 221--235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. W. Y. Yi, K. M. Lo, K. S. Mak, T. Leung, Y. Leung, and M. L. Meng. 2015. A survey of wireless sensor network based air pollution monitoring systems. Sensors 15, 12 (2015), 31392--31427.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. A Product-Form Model for the Performance Evaluation of a Bandwidth Allocation Strategy in WSNs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation
        ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation  Volume 28, Issue 2
        Special Issue on FORECAST
        April 2018
        144 pages
        ISSN:1049-3301
        EISSN:1558-1195
        DOI:10.1145/3190505
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 February 2018
        • Accepted: 1 October 2017
        • Revised: 1 August 2017
        • Received: 1 January 2017
        Published in tomacs Volume 28, Issue 2

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader