skip to main content
10.1145/3159450.3159504acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Including Coding Questions in Video Quizzes for a Flipped CS1

Published:21 February 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In an effort to improve student performance in a flipped classroom environment, this paper explores the impact of including auto-graded coding questions in gate check quizzes associated with videos for a flipped CS1 course. Previous work showed that having students complete multiple choice questions that were intended to verify that they had done the preparation work did not have a statistically significant impact on outcomes as measured through written quizzes and exams. In an attempt to engage higher-level processing of learned information, this work builds on top of that by adding questions that require students to write short segments of code for most of the quizzes in addition to doing some multiple choice questions. We found that students who were given these coding video quizzes performed better on written assessments, especially for the final exam.

References

  1. N. E. Adams. Blooms taxonomy of learning objectives. Journal of the Medical Library Association, pages 152--153, Jul 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Amresh, A. R. Carberry, and J. Femiani. Evaluating the effectiveness of flipped classrooms for teaching cs1. In 2013 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pages 733--735, Oct 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. W. G. Bowen, M. M. Chingos, K. A. Lack, and T. I. Nygren. Interactive learning online at public universities: evidence from a six-campus randomized trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1):94--111, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. S. Cummins, A. R. Beresford, and A. Rice. Investigating engagement with in-video quiz questions in a programming course. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(1):57--66, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. T. Economides. The state of the art in educational technology. In Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC), 2013 IEEE, pages 285--287, Oct 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. J. Enfield. Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at csun. TechTrends, 57(6):14--27, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Y. Hao. Exploring undergraduates' perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 59:82--92, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. D. Horton and M. Craig. Drop, fail, pass, continue: Persistence in cs1 and beyond in traditional and inverted delivery. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE '15, pages 235--240, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. C. Kong. Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78:160--173, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. L. Lacher and M. C. Lewis. The value of video quizzes in a computer science flipped classroom: An empirical study. In The 2014 International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science & Computer Engineering, pages 94--100. CSREA Press, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. L. L. Lacher, A. Jiang, Y. Zhang, and M. C. Lewis. Aptitude and previous experience in cs1 classes. In Int'l Conf. Frontiers in Education: CS and CE | FECS'17, pages 87--95, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. L. L. Lacher and M. C. Lewis. The effectiveness of video quizzes in a flipped class. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pages 224--228. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. M. C. Lewis. Instructional youtube videos. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEvjiWkK2BoIH819T-buioQ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M. C. Lewis. Introduction to the art of programming using scala, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. G. S. Mason, T. R. Shuman, and K. E. Cook. Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4):430--435, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. U. of Kent. University of Kent. https://www.kent.ac.uk/careers/tests/computer-test.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. C. R. Phillips and J. E. Trainor. Millennial students and the flipped classroom. Journal of Business and Educational Leadership, 5(1):102, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sophia.org. Growth in flipped learning. https://www.sophia.org/flipped-classroom-survey, 2014. {Online; accessed 22-August-2016}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. K. F. Stanger-Hall. Multiple-choice exams: An obstacle for higher-level thinking in introductory science classes. In CBE life sciences education, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. J. F. Strayer. How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2):171--193, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. D. Zhang, L. Zhou, R. Briggs, and J. Nunamaker. Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information and Management, 43(1):15--27, 1 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Including Coding Questions in Video Quizzes for a Flipped CS1

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader