skip to main content
10.1145/3171221.3171286acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Characterizing the Design Space of Rendered Robot Faces

Published:26 February 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Faces are critical in establishing the agency of social robots; however, building expressive mechanical faces is costly and difficult. Instead, many robots built in recent years have faces that are rendered onto a screen. This gives great flexibility in what a robot's face can be and opens up a new design space with which to establish a robot's character and perceived properties. Despite the prevalence of robots with rendered faces, there are no systematic explorations of this design space. Our work aims to fill that gap. We conducted a survey and identified 157 robots with rendered faces and coded them in terms of 76 properties. We present statistics, common patterns, and observations about this data set of faces. Next, we conducted two surveys to understand people's perceptions of rendered robot faces and identify the impact of different face features. Survey results indicate preferences for varying levels of realism and detail in robot faces based on context, and indicate how the presence or absence of specific features affects perception of the face and the types of jobs the face would be appropriate for.

References

  1. Christoph Bartneck, Dana Kulić, Elizabeth Croft, and Susana Zoghbi. 2009. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Christian Becker-Asano and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2011. Evaluating facial displays of emotion for the android robot Geminoid F. In Affective Computational Intelligence (WACI), 2011 IEEE Workshop on. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Diane S Berry and Leslie Zebrowitz Mcarthur. 1985. Some Components and Consequences of a Babyface. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48, 2 (1985), 312--323.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Mike Blow, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Andrew Appleby, Chrystopher L Nehaniv, and David Lee. 2006. The art of designing robot faces: Dimensions for human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Humanrobot interaction. ACM, 331--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cynthia Breazeal and Brian Scassellati. 1999. How to build robots that make friends and influence people. In Intelligent Robots and Systems, 1999. IROS'99. Proceedings. 1999 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, Vol. 2. IEEE, 858--863.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Cynthia L Breazeal. 2004. Designing sociable robots. MIT press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Elizabeth Broadbent, Vinayak Kumar, Xingyan Li, John Sollers 3rd, Rebecca Q Stafford, Bruce A MacDonald, and Daniel M Wegner. 2013. Robots with display screens: a robot with a more humanlike face display is perceived to have more mind and a better personality. PloS one 8, 8 (2013), e72589.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Fuyuan Cao, Jiye Liang, and Liang Bai. 2009. A new initialization method for categorical data clustering. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 7 (2009), 10223-- 10228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Haiwen Chen, Richard Russell, Ken Nakayama, and Margaret Livingstone. 2010. Crossing the uncanny valley: adaptation to cartoon faces can influence perception of human faces. Perception 39, 3 (2010), 378--386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Matthieu Courgeon, Stéphanie Buisine, and Jean-Claude Martin. 2009. Impact of expressive wrinkles on perception of a virtual characterA's facial expressions of emotions. In Intelligent Virtual Agents. Springer, 201--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kerstin Dautenhahn, Sarah Woods, Christina Kaouri, Michael L. Walters, Kheng Lee Koay, and Iain Werry. 2005. What is a robot companion - Friend, assistant or butler?. In 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Carla Diana and Andrea L Thomaz. 2011. The shape of simon: creative design of a humanoid robot shell. In CHI'11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 283--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Carl F DiSalvo, Francine Gemperle, Jodi Forlizzi, and Sara Kiesler. 2002. All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques. ACM, 321--326. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Chris D Frith and Uta Frith. 2006. How we predict what other people are going to do. Brain research 1079, 1 (2006), 36--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Rachel Gockley, Jodi Forlizzi, and Reid Simmons. 2006. Interactions with a moody robot. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction. ACM, 186--193. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jennifer Goetz, Sara Kiesler, and Aaron Powers. 2003. Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003. The 12th IEEE International Workshop on. Ieee, 55--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. F Hara and H Kobayashi. 1995. Use of face robot for human-computer communication. In Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1995. Intelligent Systems for the 21st Century, IEEE International Conference on, Vol. 2. IEEE, 1515--1520.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Ran Hee Kim, Yeop Moon, Jung Ju Choi, and Sonya S Kwak. 2014. The effect of robot appearance types on motivating donation. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction. ACM, 210--211. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Dingjun Li, PL Patrick Rau, and Ye Li. 2010. A cross-cultural study: Effect of robot appearance and task. International Journal of Social Robotics 2, 2 (2010), 175--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Manja Lohse, Frank Hegel, Agnes Swadzba, Katharina Rohlfing, SvenWachsmuth, and Britta Wrede. 2007. What can I do for you? Appearance and application of robots. In Proceedings of AISB, Vol. 7. 121--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Karl F MacDorman, Robert D Green, Chin-Chang Ho, and Clinton T Koch. 2009. Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces. Computers in human behavior 25, 3 (2009), 695--710. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rachel McDonnell and Martin Breidt. 2010. Face reality: investigating the uncanny valley for virtual faces. In ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2010 Sketches. ACM, 41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Bilge Mutlu, Fumitaka Yamaoka, Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita. 2009. Nonverbal leakage in robots: communication of intentions through seemingly unintentional behavior. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction. ACM, 69--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Nikolaas N Oosterhof and Alexander Todorov. 2008. The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 32 (2008), 11087--11092.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Aaron Powers and Sara Kiesler. 2006. The advisor robot: tracing people's mental model from a robot's physical attributes. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART conference on Human-robot interaction. ACM, 218--225. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Aaron Powers, Adam DI Kramer, Shirlene Lim, Jean Kuo, Sau-lai Lee, and Sara Kiesler. 2005. Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot. In Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005. ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on. IEEE, 158--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Jun'ichiro Seyama and Ruth S Nagayama. 2007. The uncanny valley: Effect of realism on the impression of artificial human faces. Presence: Teleoperators and virtual environments 16, 4 (2007), 337--351. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Dag Sverre Syrdal, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Sarah N Woods, Michael L Walters, and Kheng Lee Koay. 2007. Looking Good? Appearance Preferences and Robot Personality Inferences at Zero Acquaintance.. In AAAI Spring Symposium: Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics. 86--92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Angela Tinwell, Mark Grimshaw, Debbie Abdel Nabi, and Andrew Williams. 2011. Facial expression of emotion and perception of the Uncanny Valley in virtual characters. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 2 (2011), 741--749. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Alexander Todorov, Chris P Said, Andrew D Engell, and Nikolaas N Oosterhof. 2008. Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in cognitive sciences 12, 12 (2008), 455--460.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Alexander Todorov and James S Uleman. 2003. The efficiency of binding spontaneous trait inferences to actors faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 39, 6 (2003), 549--562.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Michael L Walters, Kheng Lee Koay, Dag Sverre Syrdal, Kerstin Dautenhahn, and René Te Boekhorst. 2009. Preferences and perceptions of robot appearance and embodiment in human-robot interaction trials. Procs of New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Yuichiro Yoshikawa, Kazuhiko Shinozawa, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Norihiro Hagita, and Takanori Miyamoto. 2006. Responsive Robot Gaze to Interaction Partner.. In Robotics: Science and systems.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. L.A. Zebrowitz. 1997. Reading faces: window to the soul? Westview Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=4fp9AAAAMAAJGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Characterizing the Design Space of Rendered Robot Faces

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HRI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
      February 2018
      468 pages
      ISBN:9781450349536
      DOI:10.1145/3171221

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 February 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      HRI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate49of206submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate242of1,000submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader