skip to main content
10.1145/3175684.3175689acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbdiotConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Sentiment Analysis of Online Crowd Input towards Brand Provocation in Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram

Published:20 December 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we undertake sentiment analysis from netnography data to understand the need for giving special attention to sentiments expressed by the online crowd towards brand via the social media platform. The understanding of this will explain the emotions of the brand community subscribers towards the brand as the result of the interaction established with the brand online. This study utilizes a qualitative approach in which the input given by the brand community subscriber from three chosen social media platforms were analysed using AYLIEN, Text Analysis API and Monkeylearn software to extract sentiment polarities based on Positive, Negative, Sarcastic, Ideology and Neutral sentiments. The outcome shows that the provocation sentiment needs to be managed efficiently in order to trigger interaction within and between the online crowd and brand community subscribers for sustaining a long-term relationship over the social media platform for effective brand communication strategies.

References

  1. Ho, C. W., & Wang, Y. B. (2015). Re-purchase intentions and virtual customer relationships on social media brand community. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, 5--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernoff, J. (2008), "2008 Forrester Groundswell Awards winners". Social Media Today. Retrieved from http://socialmediatoday.com/index.php?q 1/4 SMC/54276Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Noff, A. (2009), "Learning from Starbucks -- one tweet at a time". Retrieve from www.blonde20.com/blog/2009/11/19/learning-from-starbucks-one-tweet-at-a-time/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. West, T. (2012), "Starbucks tops social engagement study: what can your biz learn?", Birmingham Business Journal, 2, 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Rheingold, H. (1993), The Virtual Community: Homestanding on the Electronic Frontier, Addison-Wesley. New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Pace, Stefano, Luciano F., & Fabrizio C. (2007), Consumer Tribes. In Bernard Cova, Robert V. Kozinets, and Avi Shankar (Eds), Internationalization of a Craft Enterprise through a Virtual Tribe: 'Le Nuvole' and the Pipe Smoker Trib (pp 312--328). London, UK: Butterworth Heinemann.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kardaras, D. 2003. The potential of virtual communities in the insurance industry in the UK and Greece. International Journal of Information Management 23, 45--53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Williams, R. L. and Cothrel, J., 2000. Four smart ways to run online communities. Sloan Management Review, 41(4), 81--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Xema P. & Manisha P. S. (2017). Sentiment analysis of virtual brand communities for effective tribal marketing. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 11(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Hagel, J. III & Armstrong, A. G. (1997), Net Gain: Expanding Markets through Virtual Communities, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Andersen, P. H. (2005), "Relationship marketing and brand involvement of professionals through web-enhanced brand communities: the case of Coloplast", Industrial Marketing Management, 34, 39--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Muniz Jr, A. M., & O'guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of consumer research, 27(4), 412--432.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., & Hermann, A. (2004). Interplay between brand and brand community: Evidence from European car clubs.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L. (2013). Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66, 105--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Kozinets, R. V. (1999). E-Tribalised Marketing?: The Strategic Implications of Virtual Communities of Consumption. European Management Journal, 17(3), 252--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kozinets, R. V. (2001). Utopian enterprise: Articulating the meanings of Star Trek's culture of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(1), 61--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Pang B. & Lee L. (2004). A Sentimental Education: Sentiment Analysis Using Subjectivity Summarization Based on Minimum Cuts. Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). 271--278. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Walaa M., Ahmed H., & Hoda K.. 2014. Sentiment analysis algorithms and applications: A survey. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 5(4), 1093--1113.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Aurangzeb K., Baharum B., & Khairullah K. (2011). Sentiment classification from online customer reviews using lexical contextual sentence structure. In Software Engineering and Computer Systems, 317--331.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. AYLIEN, Text Analysis API. (n.d.). Retrieved May 11, 2017, from AYLIEN website http://aylien.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Monkeylearn, machine learning Analysis tools. (n.d.). Retrieved May 11, 2017, from Monkeylearn website, www.monkeylearn.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Stehman & Stephen V. (1997). Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy. Remote Sensing of Environment, 62 (1): 77--89.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Sentiment Analysis of Online Crowd Input towards Brand Provocation in Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        BDIOT '17: Proceedings of the International Conference on Big Data and Internet of Thing
        December 2017
        251 pages
        ISBN:9781450354301
        DOI:10.1145/3175684

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 20 December 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate75of136submissions,55%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader