skip to main content
10.1145/3185089.3185101acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicscaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Predicting Student's Board Examination Performance using Classification Algorithms

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 February 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Educational Data Mining can help stakeholders give appropriate decisions to improve educational experiences. New knowledge or models are realized when data mining techniques are applied on educational data. This study focuses on building classification model by utilizing data mining techniques for predicting the likelihood of a student to pass the Licensure Examination for Teachers (LET). Several well-known data mining algorithms such as Neural Network, Support Vector Machine, C4.5 Decision Tree, Naïve Bayes, and Logistic Regression are used to build the models. The performance of these models in terms of accuracy to predict the student's performance in the Licensure Examination for Teachers, F1 Measure and Area under the Curve (AUC) value were compared to determine which among these classification algorithms performs best. Results show that C4.5 turns to be the most suitable algorithm for the model. It has an accuracy of 73.10%, F1 measure of 62.53% and Area under the Curve value of 0.730. The identified model could be able to identify students who will likely fail the Licensure Examination for Teachers. These students should be given higher priority during their mock board review and be able to pass the board examination. Aside from helping these students, it also helps the institution get higher percentage of passers in the Licensure Examination for Teachers and can be of help during accreditation.

References

  1. Al-Shehri, H., Al-Qarni, A., Al-Saati, L., Batoaq, A., Badukhen, H., Alrashed, S., Alhiyafi, J. and Olatunji, S.O. 2017. Student performance prediction using Support Vector Machine and K-Nearest Neighbor. In Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE), 2017 IEEE 30th Canadian Conference on, IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Baepler, P., & Murdoch, C. J. 2010. Academic analytics and data mining in higher education. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4, 2 (July 2010), 17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Delavari, N., Phon-Amnuaisuk, S., & Beikzadeh, M. R. 2008. Data mining application in higher learning institutions. Informatics in Education, 7, 1 (July 2008), 31-54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Dreiseitl, S., & Ohno-Machado, L. 2002. Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review. Journal of biomedical informatics, 35, 5 (October 2002), 352-359. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Esmeralda, A. B., & Perez-Espinosa, J. 2015. Teacher Education Graduates' Performance as Predictor of Licensure Examination for Teachers Results. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 21, 1 (June 2015).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Ferrer, R. C., Buted, D. R., & Ferrer, I. C. 2015. Performance of BSEd science graduates in licensure examination for teachers: basis for a regression model. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3,(5) (December 2015), 1-6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hämäläinen, W., & Vinni, M. 2010. Classifiers for educational data mining. Handbook of Educational Data Mining, (2010), 57-74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kumar, A. D., & Radhika, D. V. 2014. A survey on predicting student performance. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 5, 5 (2014), 6147-6149.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kumar, V., & Chadha, A. 2011. An empirical study of the applications of data mining techniques in higher education. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2, 3 (March 2011), 80-84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mueen, A., Zafar, B., & Manzoor, U. 2016. Modeling and Predicting Students' Academic Performance Using Data Mining Techniques. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 8, 11 (November 2016), 36-42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Pal, A. K., & Pal, S. 2013. Analysis and mining of educational data for predicting the performance of students. International Journal of Electronics Communication and Computer Engineering, 4, 5 (2013), 1560-1565.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sachin, R. B., & Vijay, M. S. 2012. A survey and future vision of data mining in educational field. In Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies (ACCT), 2012 Second International Conference on, IEEE, 96-100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Singh, Y., & Chauhan, A. S. 2009. NEURAL NETWORKS IN DATA MINING. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 5, 1 (2009), 37-42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Stewart, C. M., Bates, R. E., & Smith, G. E. 2004. Does performance on school-administered mock boards predict performance on a dental licensure exam?. Journal of dental education, 68, 4 (April 2004), 426-432.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Tarun, I. M., Gerardo, B. D., & Tanguilig III, B. T. 2014. Generating licensure examination performance models using PART and JRip classifiers: A data mining application in education. International Journal of Computer and Communication Engineering, 3, 3 (May 2014), 203-207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Predicting Student's Board Examination Performance using Classification Algorithms

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICSCA '18: Proceedings of the 2018 7th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications
      February 2018
      349 pages
      ISBN:9781450354141
      DOI:10.1145/3185089

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      © 2018 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 February 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader