skip to main content
10.1145/3196709.3196794acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing for Intersections

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In response to the recent call for a more intersectionally-aware field of human-computer interaction (HCI), we aim to operationalize intersectionality for technology design in HCI. We develop our lens of intersectionality by drawing on the work of Rita Kaur Dhamoon, and use it to analyze data collected from a multi-sited ethnographic study of seven low-resource learning environments in the Indian states of Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal. Our research contributions are threefold. First, we extend conversations in Intersectional HCI by expanding its scope from understanding users to recognizing social processes. Second, we emphasize the importance of factoring in both penalties and privileges when conducting research in underserved contexts. Finally, we engage situated comparisons as a methodology to identify pathways for designing interactive systems across intersectionally diverse environments.

References

  1. 2015. Engineering lesson 1: Boys shouldn't speak to girls. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/ Engineering-lesson-1-Boys-shouldnt-speak-to-girls/ articleshow/21010464.cms. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Antwi A Akom, Julio Cammarota, and Shawn Ginwright. 2008. Youthtopias: Towards a new paradigm of critical youth studies. Youth Media Reporter 2, 4 (2008), 1--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Meryl Alper, Vikki S Katz, and Lynn Schofield Clark. 2016. Researching children, intersectionality, and diversity in the digital age. Journal of Children and Media 10, 1 (2016), 107--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Saleema Amershi, Meredith Ringel Morris, Neema Moraveji, Ravin Balakrishnan, and Kentaro Toyama. 2010. Multiple mouse text entry for single-display groupware. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 169--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Payal Arora. 2010. Hope-in-the-Wall? A digital promise for free learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 41, 5 (2010), 689--702.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1301--1310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Angela Calabrese Barton, Edna Tan, and Day Greenberg. 2016. The makerspace movement: Sites of possibilities for equitable opportunities to engage underrepresented youth in STEM. Teachers College Record (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryan Berrett, Jennifer Murphy, and Jamie Sullivan. 2012. Administrator insights and reflections: Technology integration in schools. The Qualitative Report 17, 1 (2012), 200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lindsay Blackwell, Jill Dimond, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Cliff Lampe. 2017. Classification and Its Consequences for Online Harassment: Design Insights from HeartMob. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 24 (Dec. 2017), 19 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Geoffrey C Bowker and Susan Leigh Star. 2000. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Avtar Brah and Ann Phoenix. 2004. Ain't IA woman? Revisiting intersectionality. Journal of international women's studies 5, 3 (2004), 75--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Cynthia Breazeal, Robin Morris, Stephanie Gottwald, Tinsley Galyean, and Maryanne Wolf. 2016. Mobile Devices for Early Literacy Intervention and Research with Global Reach. In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. ACM, 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Samantha Breslin and Bimlesh Wadhwa. 2014. EnGendering Design: Implementing Interdisciplinarity. (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Wendy Brown. 2008. The impossibility of women's studies. Women's Studies on the Edge (2008), 17--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gustavo Perez Carre ´ on, Corey Drake, and ´ Angela Calabrese Barton. 2005. The importance of presence: Immigrant parents' school engagement experiences. American Educational Research Journal 42, 3 (2005), 465--498.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Ruy Cervantes, Mark Warschauer, Bonnie Nardi, and Nithya Sambasivan. 2011. Infrastructures for low-cost laptop use in Mexican schools. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 945--954. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rakesh K Chadda and Koushik Sinha Deb. 2013. Indian family systems, collectivistic society and psychotherapy. Indian Journal of Psychiatry 55, Suppl 2 (2013), S299.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Malolan Chetlur, Ashay Tamhane, Vinay Kumar Reddy, Bikram Sengupta, Mohit Jain, Pongsakorn Sukjunnimit, and Ramrao Wagh. 2014. Edupal: Enabling blended learning in resource constrained environments. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Symposium on Computing for Development. ACM, 73--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Patricia Hill Collins. 2002. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Regin Joy Conejar, Haeng-Kon Kim, and Roger Y Lee. 2016. Opportunities Ahead the Future Mobile Learning. In Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing. Springer, 85--96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kimberle Crenshaw. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. U. Chi. Legal F. (1989), 139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Julian Cristia, Pablo Ibarraran, Santiago Cueto, Ana ´ Santiago, and Eugenio Severin. 2017. Technology and child development: Evidence from the one laptop per child program. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 9, 3 (2017), 295--320.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Andrew Cross, Edward Cutrell, and William Thies. 2012. Low-cost audience polling using computer vision. In Proceedings of the 25th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology. ACM, 45--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Larry Cuban and Petar Jandric. 2015. The dubious ´ promise of educational technologies: Historical patterns and future challenges. E-Learning and Digital Media 12, 3--4 (2015), 425--439.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Edward Cutrell, Jacki O'Neill, Srinath Bala, B Nitish, Andrew Cross, Nakull Gupta, Viraj Kumar, and William Thies. 2015. Blended learning in Indian colleges with massively empowered classroom. In Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. ACM, 47--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Kathy Davis. 2008. Intersectionality as buzzword: A sociology of science perspective on what makes a feminist theory successful. Feminist theory 9, 1 (2008), 67--85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Rita Dhamoon. 2015. A feminist approach to decolonizing anti-racism: Rethinking transnationalism, intersectionality, and settler colonialism. Feral Feminisms 4 (2015), 20--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Rita Kaur Dhamoon. 2011. Considerations on mainstreaming intersectionality. Political Research Quarterly 64, 1 (2011), 230--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Amandeep Dhir, Nahla M Gahwaji, and Gote Nyman. ¨ 2013. The role of the iPad in the hands of the learner. J. UCS 19, 5 (2013), 706--727.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Conrado I Dotong, Evelyn L De Castro, and Joselito A Dolot. 2016. Barriers for Educational Technology Integration in Contemporary Classroom Environment. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences 3, 2 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Sarah Fox, Mariam Asad, Katherine Lo, Jill P Dimond, Lynn S Dombrowski, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2016. Exploring Social Justice, Design, and HCI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3293--3300. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Sarah Fox, Amanda Menking, Stephanie Steinhardt, Anna Lauren Hoffmann, and Shaowen Bardzell. 2017. Imagining Intersectional Futures: Feminist approaches in CSCW. In Companion of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 387--393. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Joseph B Giacquinta, Jo Anne Bauer, and Jane E Levin. 1993. Beyond technology's promise: An examination of children's educational computing at home. Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Javier Gil-Flores, Javier Rodr´guez-Santero, and Juan-Jesus Torres-Gordillo. 2017. Factors that explain ´ the use of ICT in secondary-education classrooms: The role of teacher characteristics and school infrastructure. Computers in Human Behavior 68 (2017), 441--449. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Ange-Marie Hancock. 2007. When multiplication doesn't equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on politics 5, 1 (2007), 63--79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Ange-Marie Hancock. 2013. Empirical intersectionality: a tale of two approaches. UC Irvine L. Rev. 3 (2013), 259.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. David Hankerson, Andrea R Marshall, Jennifer Booker, Houda El Mimouni, Imani Walker, and Jennifer A Rode. 2016. Does Technology Have Race?. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 473--486. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Kurtis Heimerl, Janani Vasudev, Kelly G Buchanan, Tapan Parikh, and Eric Brewer. 2010a. A case study on designing interfaces for multiple users in developing regions. In Proceedings of the First ACM Symposium on Computing for Development. ACM, 9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Kurtis Heimerl, Janani Vasudev, Kelly G Buchanan, Tapan Parikh, and Eric Brewer. 2010b. Metamouse: Improving multi-user sharing of existing educational applications. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. ACM, 19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Lilly Irani, Janet Vertesi, Paul Dourish, Kavita Philip, and Rebecca E Grinter. 2010. Postcolonial computing: a lens on design and development. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1311--1320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Matthew Kam, Anuj Kumar, Shirley Jain, Akhil Mathur, and John Canny. 2009a. Improving literacy in rural India: Cellphone games in an after-school program. In Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD), 2009 International Conference on. IEEE, 139--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Matthew Kam, Akhil Mathur, Anuj Kumar, and John Canny. 2009b. Designing digital games for rural children: a study of traditional village games in India. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 31--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Naveena Karusala, Aditya Vishwanath, Arkadeep Kumar, Aman Mangal, and Neha Kumar. 2017. Care as a Resource in Underserved Learning Environments. In Proceedings of the ACM on Computer-Supported Collaborative Work, Vol. 1. 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Vikki S Katz and Carmen Gonzalez. 2016a. Community variations in low-income Latino families' technology adoption and integration. American Behavioral Scientist 60, 1 (2016), 59--80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Vikki S Katz and Carmen Gonzalez. 2016b. Toward meaningful connectivity: using multilevel communication research to reframe digital inequality. Journal of Communication 66, 2 (2016), 236--249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Konstantinos Kazakos, Siddhartha Asthana, Madeline Balaam, Mona Duggal, Amey Holden, Limalemla Jamir, Nanda Kishore Kannuri, Saurabh Kumar, Amarendar Reddy Manindla, Subhashini Arcot Manikam, and others. 2016. A Real-Time IVR Platform for Community Radio. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 343--354. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. John Kretzmann and John P McKnight. 1996. Assets-based community development. National Civic Review 85, 4 (1996), 23--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Anuj Kumar, Anuj Tewari, Geeta Shroff, Deepti Chittamuru, Matthew Kam, and John Canny. 2010. An exploratory study of unsupervised mobile learning in rural India. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 743--752. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Neha Kumar, Trevor Perrier, Michelle Desmond, Kiersten Israel-Ballard, Vikrant Kumar, Sudip Mahapatra, Anil Mishra, Shreya Agarwal, Rikin Gandhi, Pallavi Lal, and others. 2015. Projecting health: Community-led video education for maternal health. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. ACM, 17. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Sonia Livingstone and Monica E Bulger. 2013. A global agenda for children's rights in the digital age. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Alice Ludvig. 2006. Differences between women? Intersecting voices in a female narrative. European Journal of Women's Studies 13, 3 (2006), 245--258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. George E Marcus. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual review of anthropology 24, 1 (1995), 95--117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Alison Mathie and Gord Cunningham. 2005. Who is driving development? Reflections on the transformative potential of asset-based community development. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'etudes du d ´ eveloppement ´ 26, 1 (2005), 175--186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Mari J Matsuda. 1991. Beside my sister, facing the enemy: Legal theory out of coalition. Stanford Law Review (1991), 1183--1192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Leslie McCall. 2005. The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society 30, 3 (2005), 1771--1800.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Sugata Mitra. 2015. Minimally Invasive Education: Pedagogy for Development in a Connected World. In International Perspectives on Home Education. Springer, 254--277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Luis C Moll, Cathy Amanti, Deborah Neff, and Norma Gonzalez. 1992. Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into practice 31, 2 (1992), 132--141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Allison J Morgan, Yuvay Meyers Ferguson, and Eileen M Trauth. 2015. Consumer Demographics and Internet Based Health Information Search in the United States: The Intersectionality of Gender, Race, and Class. International Journal of E-Health and Medical Communications (IJEHMC) 6, 1 (2015), 58--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Preeti Mudliar and Joyojeet Pal. 2013. ICTD in the popular press: media discourse around Aakash, the'world's cheapest tablet'. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development: Full Papers-Volume 1. ACM, 43--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Bonnie A. Nardi and Vicki L. O'Day. 1999. Information Ecologies: Using Technology with Heart. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Jennifer C Nash. 2008. Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist review 89, 1 (2008), 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Joyojeet Pal, Udai Singh Pawar, Eric A Brewer, and Kentaro Toyama. 2006. The case for multi-user design for computer aided learning in developing regions. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 781--789. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Seymour Papert and Idit Harel. 1991. Situating constructionism. Constructionism 36, 2 (1991), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Katy E Pearce and Ronald E Rice. 2013. Digital divides from access to activities: Comparing mobile and personal computer Internet users. Journal of Communication 63, 4 (2013), 721--744.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Jahnavi Phalkey and Sumandro Chattapadhyay. 2015. The Aakash tablet and technological imaginaries of mass education in contemporary India. History and Technology 31, 4 (2015), 452--481.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Ann Phoenix and Pamela Pattynama. 2006. Intersectionality. (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Baukje Prins. 2006. Narrative accounts of origins: a blind spot in the intersectional approach? European Journal of Women's Studies 13, 3 (2006), 277--290.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Jayson W Richardson. 2011. Challenges of adopting the use of technology in less developed countries: The case of Cambodia. Comparative Education Review 55, 1 (2011), 008--029.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Nithya Sambasivan, Ed Cutrell, Kentaro Toyama, and Bonnie Nardi. 2010. Intermediated technology use in developing communities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2583--2592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Kamalesh Sarkar, Baishali Bal, Rita Mukherjee, Sekhar Chakraborty, Suman Saha, Arundhuti Ghosh, and Scott Parsons. 2008. Sex-trafficking, violence, negotiating skill, and HIV infection in brothel-based sex workers of eastern India, adjoining Nepal, Bhutan, and Bangladesh. Journal of health, population, and nutrition 26, 2 (2008), 223.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Ari Schlesinger, W Keith Edwards, and Rebecca E Grinter. 2017. Intersectional HCI: Engaging Identity through Gender, Race, and Class. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 5412--5427. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Ariel Schwartz, Eva Kaplan, Evviva Weinraub Lajoie, Trey Terrell, and Esther Ajambo. 2015. Using a principal agent model to explain user-centered design challenges for mother tongue reading in Kenya. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. ACM, 3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Carly Shuler, Niall Winters, and Mark West. 2013. The future of mobile learning: Implications for policy makers and planners. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2013), 7--35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Kiley Sobel, Julie A Kientz, Tamara L Clegg, Carmen Gonzalez, and Jason C Yip. 2017. Equity & Inclusivity at IDC. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, 761--767. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. J Michael Spector. 2001. An overview of progress and problems in educational technology. Interactive educational multimedia: IEM 3 (2001), 27--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Roy Steiner and Duncan Hanks. 2016. Digital Green: enabling a collective process of learning in rural development. In Harnessing the Power of Collective Learning. Routledge, 42--56.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Lucy Suchman. 1994. Speech acts and voices: Response to Winogradet al. Computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) 3, 1 (1994), 85--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  78. M Sweeney. 2016. The intersectional interface. The intersectional internet: Race, sex, class and culture online (2016), 215--228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Jo Tondeur, Johan van Braak, PA Ertmer, and Anne Ottenbreit-Leftwich. 2016. Understanding the relationship between teachers' pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Kentaro Toyama. 2011. Technology as amplifier in international development. In Proceedings of the 2011 iConference. ACM, 75--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Jan van Akker and Nienke Nieveen. 2017. The Role of Teachers in Design Research in Education. In Making Change Happen. Springer, 75--86.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Jyoti Verma and Harry C Triandis. 1999. The measurement of collectivism in India.. In International Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology., 14th, Aug, 1998, Western Washington U, Bellingham, WA, US. Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. Mark Warschauer. 2004. Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Mark Warschauer. 2006. Laptops and literacy: Learning in the wireless classroom. Teachers College Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Tara J Yosso*. 2005. Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race ethnicity and education 8, 1 (2005), 69--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. Nira Yuval-Davis. 2006. Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women's Studies 13, 3 (2006), 193--209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Designing for Intersections

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '18: Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      June 2018
      1418 pages
      ISBN:9781450351980
      DOI:10.1145/3196709

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      DIS '18 Paper Acceptance Rate107of487submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader