ABSTRACT
The Web has evolved to a dominant platform where everyone has the opportunity to express their opinions, to interact with other users, and to debate on emerging events happening around the world. On the one hand, this has enabled the presence of different viewpoints and opinions about a - usually controversial - topic (like Brexit), but at the same time, it has led to phenomena like media bias, echo chambers and filter bubbles, where users are exposed to only one point of view on the same topic. Therefore, there is the need for methods that are able to detect and explain the different viewpoints. In this paper, we propose a graph partitioning method that exploits social interactions to enable the discovery of different communities (representing different viewpoints) discussing about a controversial topic in a social network like Twitter. To explain the discovered viewpoints, we describe a method, called Iterative Rank Difference (IRD), which allows detecting descriptive terms that characterize the different viewpoints as well as understanding how a specific term is related to a viewpoint (by detecting other related descriptive terms). The results of an experimental evaluation showed that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods on viewpoint discovery, while a qualitative analysis of the proposed IRD method on three different controversial topics showed that IRD provides comprehensive and deep representations of the different viewpoints.
- Luca Maria Aiello, Alain Barrat, Rossano Schifanella, Ciro Cattuto, Benjamin Markines, and Filippo Menczer . 2012. Friendship Prediction and Homophily in Social Media. ACM Trans. Web, Vol. 6, 2, Article bibinfoarticleno9 (2012), bibinfonumpages9:1--9:33 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Khalid Al Khatib, Hinrich Schütze, and Cathleen Kantner . 2012. Automatic Detection of Point of View Differences in Wikipedia. COLING. 33--50.Google Scholar
- Hunt Allcott and Matthew Gentzkow . 2017. Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives Vol. 31, 2 (2017), 211--36.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hélio Almeida, Dorgival Guedes, Wagner Meira, and Mohammed J Zaki . 2011. Is there a best quality metric for graph clusters? Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, 44--59. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pablo Barberá . 2014. Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data. Political Analysis, Vol. 23, 1 (2014), 76--91.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David M Blei, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan . 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of machine Learning research Vol. 3, Jan (2003), 993--1022. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vincent D Blondel, Jean-Loup Guillaume, Renaud Lambiotte, and Etienne Lefebvre . 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment, Vol. 2008, 10 (2008), P10008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Erik Borra, Esther Weltevrede, Paolo Ciuccarelli, Andreas Kaltenbrunner, David Laniado, Giovanni Magni, Michele Mauri, Richard Rogers, and Tommaso Venturini . 2015. Societal controversies in Wikipedia articles. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 193--196. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Igor Brigadir, Derek Greene, and Pádraig Cunningham . 2015. Analyzing discourse communities with distributional semantic models Proceedings of the ACM Web Science Conference. ACM, 27. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yoonjung Choi, Yuchul Jung, and Sung-Hyon Myaeng . 2010. Identifying controversial issues and their sub-topics in news articles. Intelligence and Security Informatics (2010), 140--153. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Raviv Cohen and Derek Ruths . 2013. Classifying political orientation on Twitter: It's not easy! ICWSM.Google Scholar
- Michael Conover, Jacob Ratkiewicz, Matthew R Francisco, Bruno Gonccalves, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini . 2011. Political polarization on twitter. ICWSM Vol. 133 (2011), 89--96.Google Scholar
- Leon Danon, Albert Diaz-Guilera, Jordi Duch, and Alex Arenas . 2005. Comparing community structure identification. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, Vol. 2005, 09 (2005), P09008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shiri Dori-Hacohen and James Allan . 2015. Automated controversy detection on the web. In European Conference on Information Retrieval. Springer, 423--434.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Erick Elejalde, Leo Ferres, and Eelco Herder . 2017. The Nature of Real and Perceived Bias in Chilean Media Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media. 95--104. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anjie Fang, Iadh Ounis, Philip Habel, Craig Macdonald, and Nut Limsopatham . 2015. Topic-centric classification of twitter user's political orientation Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 791--794. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Seth Flaxman, Sharad Goel, and Justin M Rao . 2016. Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly Vol. 80, S1 (2016), 298--320.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kiran Garimella, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales, Aristides Gionis, and Michael Mathioudakis . 2016. Quantifying controversy in social media. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 33--42. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mathieu Jacomy, Tommaso Venturini, Sebastien Heymann, and Mathieu Bastian . 2014. ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PloS one, Vol. 9, 6 (2014), e98679.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Aditya Joshi, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, and Mark James Carman . 2016. Political Issue Extraction Model: A Novel Hierarchical Topic Model That Uses Tweets By Political And Non-Political Authors. WASSA@ NAACL-HLT. 82--90.Google Scholar
- Ravi Kannan, Santosh Vempala, and Adrian Vetta . 2004. On clusterings: Good, bad and spectral. Journal of the ACM (JACM) Vol. 51, 3 (2004), 497--515. Google ScholarDigital Library
- George Karypis and Vipin Kumar . 1995. METIS--unstructured graph partitioning and sparse matrix ordering system, version 2.0. (1995).Google Scholar
- Chunyu Kit and Xiaoyue Liu . 2008. Measuring mono-word termhood by rank difference via corpus comparison. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication Vol. 14, 2 (2008), 204--229.Google Scholar
- Hosam Mahmoud . 2008. Pólya urn models. CRC press.Google Scholar
- Yelena Mejova, Amy X Zhang, Nicholas Diakopoulos, and Carlos Castillo . 2014. Controversy and sentiment in online news. Computation and Journalism Symposium (2014).Google Scholar
- Saif Mohammad, Svetlana Kiritchenko, Parinaz Sobhani, Xiaodan Zhu, and Colin Cherry . 2016. Semeval-2016 task 6: Detecting stance in tweets. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2016). 31--41.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark Newman . 2010. Networks: an introduction. Oxford university press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark EJ Newman . 2004. Analysis of weighted networks. Physical review E, Vol. 70, 5 (2004), 056131.Google Scholar
- Viet-An Nguyen, Jordan Boyd-Graber, Philip Resnik, and Kristina Miler . 2015. Tea Party in the House: A Hierarchical Ideal Point Topic Model and Its Application to Republican Legislators in the 112th Congress Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
- Bo Pang, Lillian Lee, et almbox. . 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, Vol. 2, 1--2 (2008), 1--135. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Symeon Papadopoulos, Yiannis Kompatsiaris, Athena Vakali, and Ploutarchos Spyridonos . 2012. Community detection in social media. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Vol. 24, 3 (2012), 515--554. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Paul and Roxana Girju . 2010. A two-dimensional topic-aspect model for discovering multi-faceted topics. Urbana, Vol. 51, 61801 (2010), 36.Google Scholar
- Michael J Paul, ChengXiang Zhai, and Roxana Girju . 2010. Summarizing contrastive viewpoints in opinionated text Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics, 66--76. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marco Pennacchiotti and Ana-Maria Popescu . 2011. Democrats, republicans and starbucks afficionados: user classification in twitter Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 430--438. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ana-Maria Popescu and Marco Pennacchiotti . 2010. Detecting controversial events from twitter. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 1873--1876. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Minghui Qiu and Jing Jiang . 2013. A Latent Variable Model for Viewpoint Discovery from Threaded Forum Posts Proceedings of NAACL-HLT. 1031--1040.Google Scholar
- Minghui Qiu, Liu Yang, and Jing Jiang . 2013. Modeling interaction features for debate side clustering Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management. ACM, 873--878. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Adithya Rao and Nemanja Spasojevic . 2016. Actionable and Political Text Classification using Word Embeddings and LSTM. CoRR (2016).Google Scholar
- Zhaochun Ren, Oana Inel, Lora Aroyo, and Maarten de Rijke . 2016. Time-aware multi-viewpoint summarization of multilingual social text streams Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 387--396. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mrinmaya Sachan, Avinava Dubey, Shashank Srivastava, Eric P Xing, and Eduard Hovy . 2014. Spatial compactness meets topical consistency: jointly modeling links and content for community detection. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, 503--512. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Didi Surian, Dat Quoc Nguyen, Georgina Kennedy, Mark Johnson, Enrico Coiera, and Adam G Dunn . 2016. Characterizing Twitter discussions about HPV vaccines using topic modeling and community detection. Journal of medical Internet research Vol. 18, 8 (2016).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thibaut Thonet, Guillaume Cabanac, Mohand Boughanem, and Karen Pinel-Sauvagnat . 2016. VODUM: a topic model unifying viewpoint, topic and opinion discovery European Conference on Information Retrieval. Springer, 533--545.Google Scholar
- Thibaut Thonet, Guillaume Cabanac, Mohand Boughanem, and Karen Pinel-Sauvagnat . 2017. Users Are Known by the Company They Keep: Topic Models for Viewpoint Discovery in Social Networks. In CIKM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Giang Binh Tran and Eelco Herder . 2015. Detecting Filter Bubbles in Ongoing News Stories.. UMAP 2015 Extended Proceedings.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Viewpoint Discovery and Understanding in Social Networks
Recommendations
Users Are Known by the Company They Keep: Topic Models for Viewpoint Discovery in Social Networks
CIKM '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge ManagementSocial media platforms such as weblogs and social networking sites provide Internet users with an unprecedented means to express their opinions and debate on a wide range of issues. Concurrently with their growing importance in public communication, ...
Discovery of Topic Derivative Relationship in Social Networks
RICAI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Robotics, Intelligent Control and Artificial IntelligenceDetecting social topics and discovering emergencies are necessary for the detection and control of public opinion. One social topic may derive one and more new topics as information spreads in social networks. This paper proposes the concept of ...
Reputation Mechanisms in on-line Social Networks: The case of an Influence Estimation System in Twitter
SEEDA-CECNSM '16: Proceedings of the SouthEast European Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Social Media ConferenceOnline social networks have changed the way people communicate, create content and share it via online social actions. In order for users to engage in a social network application, they need mechanisms that will help them to find other users that they ...
Comments