skip to main content
10.1145/3210445.3210448acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Silhouette: Identifying YouTube Video Flows from Encrypted Traffic

Published:12 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Video streaming traffic often dominates mobile wireless networks, forcing Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to deploy video shaping to identify and then manage traffic during congested periods Unfortunately, the increasing use of end-to-end encryption (e.g., TSL/SSL) makes it difficult to identify video flows even with deep packet inspection. As an alternative, this paper presents Silhouette -- a real-time, lightweight video classification method suitable for ISP middle-boxes. Silhouette uses only flow statistics (i.e., "shape") for video identification making it payload-agnostic, effective for identifying video flow even when encrypted. Preliminary results with pre-classified YouTube traffic shows the promise of the Silhouette approach, yielding high identification accuracy over a range of video content and encoding qualities.

References

  1. A. Langle et al. 2017. The QUIC Transport Protocol: Design and Internet-Scale Deployment. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM. Los Angeles, CA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Bhat, A. Rizk, and M. Zink. 2017. Not So QUIC: A Performance Study of DASH over QUIC. In Proceedings of NOSSDAV. Taipei, Taiwan. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cisco System Inc. 2017. Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update. Technical Report. Cisco System Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Claypool. 2008. Network Characteristics for Server Selection in Online Games. In Proceedings of MMCN. San Jose, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. G. Dimopoulos, I. Leontiadis, P. Barlet-Ros, and K. Papagiannaki. 2016. Measuring Video QoE from Encrypted Traffic. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM IMC. Santa Monica, CA, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. A. Kakhki, F. Li, D. Choffnes, A. Mislove, and E. Katz-Bassett. 2016. BingeOn Under the Microscope: Understanding T-Mobile's Zero-Rating Implementation. In Internet-QoE Workshop. Florianopolis, Brazil. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. Katsarakis, R. C. Teixeira, M. Papadopouli, and V. Christophides. 2016. Towards a Causal Analysis of Video QoE from Network and Application QoS. In Proceedings of the Workshop on QoE-based Analysis and Management of Data Communication Networks. Florianopolis, Brazil. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. J. Khalife, A. Hajjard, and J. Diaz-Verdejo. 2013. Performance of OpenDPI in Identifying Sampled Network Traffic. Journal of Networks 8, 1 (2013), 71--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. D. Krishnappa, D. Bhat, and M. Zink. 2013. DASHing YouTube: An Analysis of using DASH in YouTube Video Service. In Proceedings of LCN.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. F.Li, J.Chung, X.Jiang, and M. Claypool. 2018. Who is the King of the Hill? Traffic Analysis over a 4G Network. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). Kansas City, MO, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. F. Li, M. Claypool, and R. Kinicki. 2015. Treatment-based Traffic Classification for Residential Wireless Networks. In International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC). Anaheim, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. F. Li, A. Razaghpanah, K. Molavi, N. Akhavan, D. Choffnes, P. Gill, and A. Mislove. 2017. liberate,(n): A Library for Exposing (Traffic-Classification) Rules and Avoiding them Efficiently. In Proceedings of the Internet Measurement Conference. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Moore and K. Papagiannaki. 2005. Toward the Accurate Identification of Network Applications. In Passive and Active Measurement Workshop. Boston, MA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. T.T.T. Nguyen, G. Armitage, P. Branch, and S. Zander. 2012. Timely and Continuous Machine-learning-based Classification for Interactive IP Traffic. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON) 20, 6 (2012), 1880--1894. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. T. T. T. Nguyen and G. Armitage. 2008. A Survey of Techniques for Internet Traffic Classification Using Machine Learning. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials 10, 4 (April 2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Reed and M. Kranch. 2017. Identifying HTTPS-Protected Netflix Videos in Real-Time. In Proceedings of CODASPY. Scottsdale, AZ, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. J. Terrell, K. Jeffay, F.D. Smith, J. Gogan, and J. Keller. 2009. Passive, Streaming Inference of TCP Connection Structure for Network Server Management. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Traffic Monitoring and Analysis. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. J. Zhang, C. Chen, Y. Xiang, W. Zhou, and Y. Xiang. 2013. Internet Traffic Classification by Aggregating Correlated Naive Bayes Predictions. Journal of IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 8, 1 (January 2013), 5--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Silhouette: Identifying YouTube Video Flows from Encrypted Traffic

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        NOSSDAV '18: Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGMM Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video
        June 2018
        84 pages
        ISBN:9781450357722
        DOI:10.1145/3210445

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 June 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate118of363submissions,33%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader