skip to main content
10.1145/3210825.3210832acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimxConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

"I Can Watch What I Want": A Diary Study of On-Demand and Cross-Device Viewing

Published:25 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent years, on-demand video services, such as Netflix and Amazon Video, have become extremely popular. To understand how people use these services, we recruited 20 people from nine households to keep a viewing diary for 14 days. To better understand these household viewing diaries, in-depth interviews were conducted. We found that people took advantage of the freedom and choice that on-demand services offer, watching on different devices and in different locations, both in the home and outside. People often watched alone so they could watch what they wanted, rather than coming together to watch something of mutual interest. Despite this flexibility, the evening prime time continued to be the most popular time for people to watch on-demand content. Sometimes they watched for extended periods, and during interviews concerns were expressed about how on-demand services make it far too easy to watch too much and that this is often undesirable.

References

  1. Louise Barkhuus and Barry Brown. 2009. Unpacking the Television: User Practices around a Changing Technology. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 16, 3, Article 15 (Sept. 2009), 22 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Rhiannon Bury and Johnson Li. 2015. Is It Live or Is It Timeshifted, Streamed or Downloaded? Watching Television in the Era of Multiple Screens. New Media & Society 17, 4 (2015), 592--610.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. The Nielsen Company. 2016. On-demand Demographics: VOD Viewing Across Generations. (2016). http://www.nielsen.com/uk/en/insights/news/2016/on-demand-demographics-vod-viewing-across-generations.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Anna L. Cox, Sandy J.J. Gould, Marta E. Cecchinato, Ioanna Iacovides, and Ian Renfree. 2016. Design Frictions for Mindful Interactions: The Case for Microboundaries. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA'16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1389--1397. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dimph de Feijter, Vassilis-Javed Khan, and Marnix van Gisbergen. 2016. Confessions of a 'Guilty' Couch Potato Understanding and Using Context to Optimize Binge-watching Behavior. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (TVX '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 59--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. David Gauntlett and Annette Hill. 2002. TV Living: Television, Culture and Everyday Life. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lilly Irani, Robin Jeffries, and Andrea Knight. 2010. Rhythms and plasticity: television temporality at home. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 14, 7 (01 Oct 2010), 621--632. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Robert J. Logan, Sheila Augaitis, Robert H. Miller, and Keith Wehmeyer. 1995. Living Room Culture - an Anthropological Study of Television Usage Behaviors. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, Vol. 39. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 326--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jennifer McNally and Beth Harrington. 2017. How Millennials and Teens Consume Mobile Video. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (TVX'17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 31--39. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. João Nogueira, Lucas Guardalben, Bernardo Cardoso, and Susana Sargento. 2017. Catch-up TV Analytics: Statistical Characterization and Consumption Patterns Identification on a Production Service. Multimedia Systems 23, 5 (01 Oct 2017), 563--581. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ofcom. 2016. Linear Vs. Non-linear Viewing: A Qualitative Investigation Exploring Viewers' Behaviour and Attitudes Towards Using Different TV Platforms and Services Providers. (2016). http://www.ofcom.org.uk/research-and-data/tv-radio-and-on-demand/tv-research/linear-vs-non-linear-viewingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ofcom. 2017. The Communications Market Report 2017. (2017). http://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/105074/cmr-2017-uk.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Kenton O'Hara, April Slayden Mitchell, and Alex Vorbau. 2007. Consuming Video on Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 857--866. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Matthew Pittman and Kim Sheehan. 2015. Sprinting a Media Marathon: Uses and Gratifications of Binge-watching Television through Netflix. First Monday 20, 10 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacob M. Rigby, Duncan P. Brumby, Anna L. Cox, and Sandy J.J. Gould. 2016. Watching Movies on Netflix: Investigating the Effect of Screen Size on Viewer Immersion. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 714--721. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jacob M. Rigby, Duncan P. Brumby, Anna L. Cox, and Sandy J.J. Gould. 2018. Old Habits Die Hard: A Diary Study of On-demand Video Viewing. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Darby Saxbe, Anthony Graesch, and Marie Alvik. 2011. Television As a Social or Solo Activity: Understanding Families' Everyday Television Viewing Patterns. Communication Research Reports 28, 2 (2011), 180--189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Alex Taylor and Richard Harper. 2003. Switching off to Switch On. In Inside the Smart Home, Richard Harper (Ed.). Springer London, London, Chapter 7, 115--126.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. William Trouleau, Azin Ashkan, Weicong Ding, and Brian Eriksson. 2016. Just One More: Modeling Binge Watching Behavior. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1215--1224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jeroen Vanattenhoven and David Geerts. 2015. Broadcast, Video-on-demand, and Other Ways to Watch Television Content: A Household Perspective. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (TVX '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 73--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Emily Walton-Pattison, Stephan U. Dombrowski, and Justin Presseau. 2016. 'Just One More Episode': Frequency and Theoretical Correlates of Television Binge Watching. Journal of Health Psychology 23, 1 (2016), 17--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. "I Can Watch What I Want": A Diary Study of On-Demand and Cross-Device Viewing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader