skip to main content
10.1145/3219819.3220032acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Demand-Aware Charger Planning for Electric Vehicle Sharing

Published:19 July 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Cars of the future have been predicted as shared and electric. There has been a rapid growth in electric vehicle (EV) sharing services worldwide in recent years. For EV-sharing platforms to excel, it is essential for them to offer private charging infrastructure for exclusive use that meets the charging demand of their clients. Particularly, they need to plan not only the places to build charging stations, but also the amounts of chargers per station, to maximally satisfy the requirements on global charging coverage and local charging demand. Existing research efforts are either inapplicable for their different problem formulations or are at a coarse granularity. In this paper, we formulate the \underlineE lectric \underlineV ehicle \underlineC harger \underlineP lanning (EVCP) problem especially for EV-sharing. We prove that the \shortpro problem is NP-hard, and design an approximation algorithm to solve the problem with a theoretical bound of $1-\frac1 e $. We also devise some optimization techniques to speed up the solution. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets validate the effectiveness and the efficiency of our proposed solutions.

References

  1. Charles Botsford and Adam Szczepanek . 2009. Fast Charging vs. Slow Charging: Pros and cons for the New Age of Electric Vehicles International Battery Hybrid Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle Symposium.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. T Donna Chen, Kara M Kockelman, William J Murray, and Moby Khan . 2013. The electric vehicle charging station location problem: a parking-based assignment method for Seattle. In Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting, Vol. Vol. 340. 13--1254.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Reza Zanjirani Farahani and Masoud Hekmatfar . 2009. Facility location: concepts, models, algorithms and case studies. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Inês Frade, Anabela Ribeiro, Gonccalo Gonccalves, and António Antunes . 2011. Optimal location of charging stations for electric vehicles in a neighborhood in Lisbon, Portugal. Transportation research record: journal of the transportation research board 2252 (2011), 91--98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Yajing Gao and Yandong Guo . 2013. Optimal Planning of Charging Station for Phased Electric Vehicle. Energy & Power Engineering Vol. 05, 4 (2013), 1393--1397.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Fang He, Di Wu, Yafeng Yin, and Yongpei Guan . 2013. Optimal deployment of public charging stations for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological Vol. 47 (2013), 87--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Dorit S Hochbaum . 1996. Approximation algorithms for NP-hard problems. PWS Publishing Company. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Long Jia, Zechun Hu, Yonghua Song, and Zhuowei Luo . 2012. Optimal siting and sizing of electric vehicle charging stations IEEE International Electric Vehicle Conference, IEVC 2012. IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Albert Y. S. Lam, Yiu-Wing Leung, and Xiaowen Chu . 2014. Electric Vehicle Charging Station Placement: Formulation, Complexity, and Solutions. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid Vol. 5, 6 (2014), 2846--2856.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Yanhua Li, Jun Luo, Chi-Yin Chow, Kam-Lam Chan, Ye Ding, and Fan Zhang . 2015. Growing the charging station network for electric vehicles with trajectory data analytics 31st IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE 2015. 1376--1387.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Chen Liu, Ke Deng, Chaojie Li, Jianxin Li, Yanhua Li, and Jun Luo . 2016. The Optimal Distribution of Electric-Vehicle Chargers across a City 16th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, ICDM 2016. 261--270.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhipeng Liu, Fushuan Wen, and Gerard Ledwich . 2012 a. Optimal Planning of Electric-Vehicle Charging Stations in Distribution Systems. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery Vol. 28, 1 (2012), 102--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Zi Fa Liu, Wei Zhang, Ji Xing, and Ke Li . 2012 b. Optimal Planning of charging station for electric vehicle based on particle swarm optimization. In IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies-Asia, ISGT Asia 2012. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. George L. Nemhauser, Laurence A. Wolsey, and Marshall L. Fisher . 1978. An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions - I. Mathematical Programming Vol. 14, 1 (1978), 265--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Morgan Stanley Blue Papers . 2016. Shared Mobility on the Road of the Future. https://goo.gl/onaZn1. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Alexander Schrijver . 1998. Theory of linear and integer programming. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Yongxin Tong, Yuqiang Chen, Zimu Zhou, Lei Chen, Jie Wang, Qiang Yang, Jieping Ye, and Weifeng Lv . 2017 a. The Simpler The Better: A Unified Approach to Predicting Original Taxi Demands based on Large-Scale Online Platforms. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, SIGKDD 2017. 1653--1662. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Yongxin Tong, Jieying She, Bolin Ding, Libin Wang, and Lei Chen . 2016. Online mobile Micro-Task Allocation in spatial crowdsourcing 32nd IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE 2016. 49--60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Yongxin Tong, Libin Wang, Zimu Zhou, Lei Chen, Bowen Du, and Jieping Ye . 2018. Flexible Online Task Assignment in Real-Time Spatial Data Proceedings of the 37th ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Yongxin Tong, Libin Wang, Zimu Zhou, Bolin Ding, Lei Chen, Jieping Ye, and Ke Xu . 2017 b. Flexible Online Task Assignment in Real-Time Spatial Data. PVLDB Vol. 10, 11 (2017), 1334--1345. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Wikipedia . 2017. Autolib'. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autolib%27. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. James H Williams, Andrew DeBenedictis, Rebecca Ghanadan, Amber Mahone, Jack Moore, William R Morrow, Snuller Price, and Margaret S Torn . 2012. The technology path to deep greenhouse gas emissions cuts by 2050: the pivotal role of electricity. Science Vol. 335, 6064 (2012), 53--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Yanhai Xiong, Jiarui Gan, Bo An, Chunyan Miao, and Ana L. C. Bazzan . 2015. Optimal Electric Vehicle Charging Station Placement Proceedings of the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2015. 2662--2668. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Demand-Aware Charger Planning for Electric Vehicle Sharing

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        KDD '18: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
        July 2018
        2925 pages
        ISBN:9781450355520
        DOI:10.1145/3219819

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 July 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        KDD '18 Paper Acceptance Rate107of983submissions,11%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader