skip to main content
10.1145/3242671.3242681acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageschi-playConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Guts Game: Towards Designing Ingestible Games

Published:23 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Ingestible sensors, such as capsule endoscopy and medication monitoring pills, are becoming increasingly popular in the medical domain, yet few studies have considered what experiences may be designed around ingestible sensors. We believe such sensors may create novel bodily experiences for players when it comes to digital games. To explore the potential of ingestible sensors for game designers, we designed a two-player game - the "Guts Game" - where the players play against each other by completing a variety of tasks. Each task requires the players to change their own body temperature measured by an ingestible sensor. Through a study of the Guts Game (N=14) that interviewed players about their experience, we derived four design themes: 1) Bodily Awareness, 2) Human-Computer Integration, 3) Agency, and 4) Uncomfortableness. We used the four themes to articulate a set of design strategies that designers can consider when aiming to develop engaging ingestible games.

References

  1. J. Andreu-Perez, D. R. Leff, H. M. D. Ip, and G. Z. Yang. 2015. From Wearable Sensors to Smart Implants-Toward Pervasive and Personalized Healthcare. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 62, 12 (Dec 2015), 2750--2762.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Tom Baranowski, Richard Buday, Debbe I. Thompson, and Janice Baranowski. 2008. Playing for Real: Video Games and Stories for Health-Related Behavior Change. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 34, 1 (2008), 74--82.e10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Gabriella Giannachi, Brendan Walker, Joe Marshall, and Tom Rodden. 2012. Uncomfortable Interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2005--2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Felix Brandmueller and Zhuying Li. 2017. Guts Game: A Game using Ingestible Sensors. In Extended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, 625--631. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Lisa Brolin. 2017. Designing for Body Awareness: A Study on Enabling Body Awareness in Mindfulness Through Wearable Haptic Thermal Technology. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Richard Byrne. 2016. Designing Digital Vertigo Games. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 25--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. Mc Caffrey, O. Chevalerias, C. O'Mathuna, and K. Twomey. 2008. Swallowable-Capsule Technology. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7, 1 (Jan 2008), 23--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Robert Cercos and Florian 'Floyd' Mueller. 2013. Watch Your Steps: Designing a Semi-public Display to Promote Physical Activity. In Proceedings of The 9th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Matters of Life and Death (IE '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jenova Chen. 2007. Flow in Games (and Everything else). Commun. ACM 50, 4 (April 2007), 31--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Andrew Dekker and Erik Champion. 2007. Please Biofeed the Zombies: Enhancing the Gameplay and Display of a Horror Game Using Biofeedback. In Proc. of DiGRA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sebastian Deterding, Andrés Lucero, Jussi Holopainen, Chulhong Min, Adrian Cheok, Annika Waern, and Steffen Walz. 2015. Embarrassing Interactions. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2365--2368. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Umer Farooq and Jonathan Grudin. 2016. Human-computer Integration. interactions 23, 6 (Oct. 2016), 26--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Venere Ferraro and Secil Ugur. 2011. Designing Wearable Technologies Through a User Centered Approach. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (DPPI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 5, 8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Josh Andres Florian 'Floyd' Mueller, Rich Byrne and Rakesh Patibanda. in press. Experiencing the Body as Play. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. C D Frith. 1979. Consciousness, information processing and schizophrenia. The British Journal of Psychiatry 134, 3 (1979), 225--235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Annie Gentes, Aude Guyot-Mbodji, and Isabelle Demeure. 2010. Gaming on the move: urban experience as a new paradigm for mobile pervasive game design. Multimedia Systems 16, 1 (01 Feb 2010), 43--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kiel M Gilleade and Alan Dix. 2004. Using Frustration in the Design of Adaptive Videogames. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 228--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Anton Gustafsson, Cecilia Katzeff, and Magnus Bang. 2009. Evaluation of a pervasive game for domestic energy engagement among teenagers. Computers in Entertainment (CIE) 7, 4 (2009), 54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Marc Hassenzahl, Matthias Laschke, and Julian Praest. 2016. On the Stories Activity Trackers Tell. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct (UbiComp '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 582--587. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kayla J. Heffernan, Frank Vetere, and Shanton Chang. 2015. Insertables: I'Ve Got It Under My Skin. interactions 23, 1 (Dec. 2015), 52--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Kayla J. Heffernan, Frank Vetere, and Shanton Chang. 2016. You Put What, Where?: Hobbyist Use of Insertable Devices. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1798--1809. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. M. Heidegger. 1967. Being and Time. Blackwell. b67008917 https://books.google.com.au/books?id=S57m5gW0L-MCGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sarah Homewood. 2016. Maintaining Relationships With Our Devices. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 273--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Kristina Höök. 2010. Transferring qualities from horseback riding to design. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries. ACM, 226--235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Kristina Höök, Martin P. Jonsson, Anna Ståhl, and Johanna Mercurio. 2016. Somaesthetic Appreciation Design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3131--3142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Amy Huggard, Anushka De Mel, Jayden Garner, Cagdas "Chad" Toprak, Alan D. Chatham, and Florian Mueller. 2013. Musical Embrace: Facilitating Engaging Play Experiences Through Social Awkwardness. In CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3067--3070. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bo Westerlund, Benjamin B. Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stéphane Conversy, Helen Evans, Heiko Hansen, Nicolas Roussel, and Björn EiderbĠck. 2003. Technology Probes: Inspiring Design for and with Families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '03). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. S. Imani, P. P. Mercier, A. J. Bandodkar, J. Kim, and J. Wang. 2016. Wearable chemical sensors: Opportunities and challenges. In 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS). 1122--1125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Kalle Jegers. 2007. Pervasive Game Flow: Understanding Player Enjoyment in Pervasive Gaming. Comput. Entertain. 5, 1, Article 9 (Jan. 2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Martin Jonsson, Anna Ståhl, Johanna Mercurio, Anna Karlsson, Naveen Ramani, and Kristina Höök. 2016. The Aesthetics of Heat: Guiding Awareness with Thermal Stimuli. In Proceedings of the TEI '16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 109--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Susan Joslyn, Lou Nemec, and Sonia Savelli. 2013. The Benefits and Challenges of Predictive Interval Forecasts and Verification Graphics for End Users. Weather, Climate, and Society 5, 2 (2013), 133--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Kourosh Kalantar-zadeh, Nam Ha, Jian Zhen Ou, and Kyle J. Berean. 2017. Ingestible Sensors. ACS Sensors 2, 4 (2017), 468--483.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Sang-won Leigh, Harpreet Sareen, Hsin-Liu Cindy Kao, Xin Liu, and Pattie Maes. 2017. Body-Borne Computers as Extensions of Self. Computers 6, 1 (2017), 12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Zhuying Li, Felix Brandmueller, Florian 'Floyd' Mueller, and Stefan Greuter. 2017. Ingestible Games: Swallowing a Digital Sensor to Play a Game. In Extended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '17 Extended Abstracts). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 511--518. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. MarketsAndMarkets. 2015. Smart Pills Market by Application (Capsule Endoscopy, Drug Delivery, Patient Monitoring), Target Area (Esophagus, Stomach, Small Intestine, Large Intestine), Geography - Global Forecast to 2024. http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/. (2015). Online; accessed 12 April 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Wolf E. Mehling, Judith Wrubel, Jennifer J. Daubenmier, Cynthia J. Price, Catherine E. Kerr, Theresa Silow, Viranjini Gopisetty, and Anita L. Stewart. 2011. Body Awareness: a phenomenological inquiry into the common ground of mind-body therapies. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 6, 1 (07 Apr 2011), 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Markus Montola. 2005. Exploring the Edge of the Magic Circle: Defining Pervasive Games. In CD-ROM Proceedings of Digital Arts and Culture. Copenhagen. 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Florian 'Floyd' Mueller, Darren Edge, Frank Vetere, Martin R. Gibbs, Stefan Agamanolis, Bert Bongers, and Jennifer G. Sheridan. 2011. Designing Sports: A Framework for Exertion Games. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2651--2660. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Florian 'Floyd' Mueller and Damon Young. 2017. Five Lenses for Designing Exertion Experiences. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2473--2487. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Lennart Erik Nacke, Michael Kalyn, Calvin Lough, and Regan Lee Mandryk. 2011. Biofeedback Game Design: Using Direct and Indirect Physiological Control to Enhance Game Interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 103--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Claudia Nunez-Pacheco and Lian Loke. 2014. Crafting the Body-tool: A Body-centred Perspective on Wearable Technology. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 553--566. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Ian Oakley and Jun-Seok Park. 2007. Designing Eyes-Free Interaction. In Haptic and Audio Interaction Design, Ian Oakley and Stephen Brewster (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 121--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Rakesh Patibanda, Florian 'Floyd' Mueller, Matevz Leskovsek, and Jonathan Duckworth. 2017. Life Tree: Understanding the Design of Breathing Exercise Games. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 19--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Sebastiaan Pijnappel and Florian Mueller. 2013. 4 design themes for skateboarding. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. ACM, 1271--1274. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Brian A. Primack, Mary V. Carroll, Megan McNamara, Mary Lou Klem, Brandy King, Michael Rich, Chun W. Chan, and Smita Nayak. 2012. Role of Video Games in Improving Health-Related Outcomes: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 42, 6 (2012), 630--638.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Bjørn Rasmussen, Torben Nathan, and Michael Dam Jensen. 2016. Symptomatic Patency Capsule Retention in Suspected Crohn's Disease. Journal of Crohn's and Colitis 10, 12 (2016), 1445--1447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Yvonne Rogers and Henk Muller. 2006. A framework for designing sensor-based interactions to promote exploration and reflection in play. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64, 1 (2006), 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Orit Shaer, Oded Nov, Lauren Westendorf, and Madeleine Ball. 2017. Communicating Personal Genomic Information to Non-experts: A New Frontier for Human-Computer Interaction. Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction 11, 1 (2017), 1--62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Tadeusz Stach, TC Graham, Jeffrey Yim, and Ryan E Rhodes. 2009. Heart rate control of exercise video games. In Proceedings of Graphics interface 2009. Canadian Information Processing Society, 125--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Ayoung Suh, Ruohan Li, and Lili Liu. 2016. The Use of Wearable Technologies and Body Awareness: A Body--Tool Relationship Perspective. In HCI International 2016 -- Posters' Extended Abstracts, Constantine Stephanidis (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 388--392.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Penelope Sweetser and Peta Wyeth. 2005. GameFlow: A Model for Evaluating Player Enjoyment in Games. Comput. Entertain. 3, 3 (July 2005), 3--3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Daniel Sznycer, John Tooby, Leda Cosmides, Roni Porat, Shaul Shalvi, and Eran Halperin. 2016. Shame closely tracks the threat of devaluation by others, even across cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113, 10 (2016), 2625--2630.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Kevin Warwick. 2003. Cyborg morals, cyborg values, cyborg ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 5, 3 (01 Sep 2003), 131--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Gavin Wood and Madeline Balaam. 2015. Submission for the Embarrassing Interactions Workshop: Playing with Embarrassment.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Daniel Yule, Bonnie MacKay, and Derek Reilly. 2015. Operation Citadel: Exploring the Role of Docents in Mixed Reality. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 285--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Guts Game: Towards Designing Ingestible Games

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI PLAY '18: Proceedings of the 2018 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play
        October 2018
        563 pages
        ISBN:9781450356244
        DOI:10.1145/3242671
        • General Chairs:
        • Florian 'Floyd' Mueller,
        • Daniel Johnson,
        • Ben Schouten,
        • Program Chairs:
        • Phoebe O. Toups Dugas,
        • Peta Wyeth

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 October 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI PLAY '18 Paper Acceptance Rate43of123submissions,35%Overall Acceptance Rate421of1,386submissions,30%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader