skip to main content
10.1145/3267242.3267244acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Conveying language through haptics: a multi-sensory approach

Published:08 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In our daily lives, we rely heavily on our visual and auditory channels to receive information from others. In the case of impairment, or when large amounts of information are already transmitted visually or aurally, alternative methods of communication are needed. A haptic language offers the potential to provide information to a user when visual and auditory channels are unavailable. Previously created haptic languages include deconstructing acoustic signals into features and displaying them through a haptic device, and haptic adaptations of Braille or Morse code; however, these approaches are unintuitive, slow at presenting language, or require a large surface area. We propose using a multi-sensory haptic device called MISSIVE, which can be worn on the upper arm and is capable of producing brief cues, sufficient in quantity to encode the full English phoneme set. We evaluated our approach by teaching subjects a subset of 23 phonemes, and demonstrated an 86% accuracy in a 50 word identification task after 100 minutes of training.

References

  1. Edoardo Battaglia, Janelle P Clark, Matteo Bianchi, Manuel G Catalano, Antonio Bicchi, and Marcia K O'Malley. 2017. The Rice Haptic Rocker: skin stretch haptic feedback with the Pisa/IIT SoftHand. In World Haptics Conf. IEEE, 7--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. P. L. Brooks and B. J. Frost. 1983. Evaluation of a tactile vocoder for word recognition. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 74, 1 (1983), 34--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Zvi Drezner. 2003. A new genetic algorithm for the quadratic assignment problem. INFORMS Journal on Computing 15, 3 (2003), 320 -- 330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Nathan Dunkelberger, Joshua Bradley, Jennifer L. Sullivan, Ali Israr, Frances Lau, Keith Klumb, Freddy Abnousi, and Marcia K. O'Malley. 2018. Improving Perception Accuracy with Multi-sensory Haptic Cue Delivery. In Haptics: Science, Technology, and Applications. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 289--301.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mario Enriquez, Karon MacLean, and Christian Chita. 2006. Haptic Phonemes: Basic Building Blocks of Haptic Communication. In Proceedings of the 8th Int. Conf. on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 302--309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ali Israr, Peter H Meckl, Charlotte M Reed, and Hong Z Tan. 2009. Controller design and consonantal contrast coding using a multi-finger tactual display. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125, 6 (2009), 3925--3935.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ali Israr, Peter H Meckl, and Hong Z Tan. 2004. A two DOF controller for a multi-finger tactual display using a loop-shaping technique. In Proceedings of the ASME Int. Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE04). 1083--1089.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Chandrika Jayant, Christine Acuario, William Johnson, Janet Hollier, and Richard Ladner. 2010. V-braille: Haptic Braille Perception Using a Touch-screen and Vibration on Mobile Phones. In Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '10). 295--296. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Yang Jiao, Frederico M. Severgnini, Juan Sebastian Martinez, Jaehong Jung, Hong Z. Tan, Charlotte M. Reed, E. Courtenay Wilson, Frances Lau, Ali Israr, Robert Turcott, Keith Klumb, and Freddy Abnousi. 2018. A Comparative Study of Phoneme- and Word-Based Learning of English Words Presented to the Skin. In Haptics: Science, Technology, and Applications. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 623--635.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Edward T. Auer Jr., Lynne E. Bernstein, and David C. Coulter. 1998. Temporal and spatio-temporal vibrotactile displays for voice fundamental frequency: An initial evaluation of a new vibrotactile speech perception aid with normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 104, 4 (1998), 2477--2489.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Vincent Lévesque, Jérôme Pasquero, Vincent Hayward, and Maryse Legault. 2005. Display of virtual braille dots by lateral skin deformation: feasibility study. ACM Trans. on Applied Perception (TAP) 2, 2 (2005), 132--149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Eliane M. Loiola, Nair M. Maia de Abreu, Paulo O. Boaventura-Netto, Peter Hahn, and Tania Querido. 2007. A survey for the quadratic assignment problem. European Journal of Operational Research 176, 2 (2007), 657--690.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Granit Luzhnica, Eduardo Veas, and Viktoria Pammer. 2016. Skin Reading: Encoding Text in a 6-channel Haptic Display. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 148--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kimberly Myles and Mary S. Binseel. 2007. The Tactile Modality: A Review of Tactile Sensitivity and Human Tactile Interfaces, U.S. Army Research Laboratory, ARL-TR-4115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Scott D. Novich and David M. Eagleman. 2015. Using space and time to encode vibrotactile information: toward an estimate of the skin's achievable throughput. Experimental Brain Research 233, 10 (2015), 2777--2788.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. E. Piateski and L. Jones. 2005. Vibrotactile pattern recognition on the arm and torso. In First Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. World Haptics Conference. 90--95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Charlotte M Reed, Nathaniel I Durlach, and Louis D Braida. 1982. Research on tactile communication of speech: a review. ASHA monographs 20 (1982), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hong Tan, Robert Gray, J Jay Young, and Ryan Taylor. 2003. A haptic back display for attentional and directional cueing. Haptics-e, The electronic journal of haptics research (2003).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Hong Z. Tan, Nathaniel I. Durlach, William M. Rabinowitz, Charlotte M. Reed, and Jonathan R. Santos. 1997. Reception of Morse code through motional, vibrotactile, and auditory stimulation. Perception & Psychophysics 59, 7 (1997), 1004--1017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Hong Z. Tan, Charlotte M. Reed, and Nathaniel I. Durlach. 2010. Optimum Information Transfer Rates for Communication through Haptic and Other Sensory Modalities. IEEE Trans. on Haptics 3, 2 (2010), 98--108. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Emma Treadway, Brent Gillespie, Darren Bolger, Amy Blank, Marcia K. O'Malley, and Alicia Davis. 2015. The role of auxiliary and referred haptic feedback in myoelectric control. In World Haptics Conf. IEEE, Northwestern University, 13--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Robert Turcott, Jennifer Chen, Pablo Castillo, Brian Knott, Wahyudinata Setiawan, Forrest Briggs, Keith Klumb, Freddy Abnousi, Prasad Chakka, Frances Lau, and Ali Israr. 2018. Efficient Evaluation of Coding Strategies for Transcutaneous Language Communication. In Haptics: Science, Technology, and Applications. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 600--611.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Siyan Zhao, Ali Israr, Frances Lau, and Freddy Abnousi. 2018. Coding Tactile Symbols for Phonemic Communication. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Conveying language through haptics: a multi-sensory approach

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ISWC '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
      October 2018
      307 pages
      ISBN:9781450359672
      DOI:10.1145/3267242

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of the United States government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 October 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate38of196submissions,19%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader