skip to main content
10.1145/3267242.3267246acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

On specialized window lengths and detector based human activity recognition

Published:08 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Sliding window based activity recognition chains represent the state-of-the-art for many mobile and embedded scenarios as they are common in wearable computing. The length of the analysis frames is a crucial system parameter that directly influences the effectiveness of the overall approach. In this paper we present a method that optimizes the window length - individually for each target activity. Instead of employing a single, multi-class recognition system that is based on a generic window length, we combine individually optimized activity detectors into an Ensemble based recognition approach. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach through an experimental evaluation on eight benchmark datasets. The proposed method leads to significant improvements across a range of activity recognition application domains.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. O. Banos, J Galvez, M Damas, H Pomares, and I Rojas. 2014. Window size impact in human activity recognition. Sensors 14, 4 (2014), 6474--6499.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. A. Bulling, U. Blanke, and B. Schiele. 2014. A Tutorial on Human Activity Recognition Using Body-worn Inertial Sensors. ACM Comput. Surv. 46, 3 (Jan. 2014). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. Chavarriaga, H. Sagha, A. Calatroni, S. Digumarti, G. Troester, J. del R Millan, and D. Roggen. 2013. The Opportunity challenge: A benchmark database for on-body sensor-based activity recognition. PRL 34, 15 (2013), 2033--2042. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. L. Cheng, Y. Yu, X. Liu, J. Su, and Y. Guan. 2017. Recognition of Human Activities Using Fast and Adaptive Sparse Representation Based on Wearable Sensors. In Proc. ICMLA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Chowdhury, D. Tjondronegoro, V. Chandran, and S. Trost. 2017. Physical activity recognition using posterior-adapted class-based fusion of multi-accelerometers data. J. Biomed Health Inform (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. K. Forster, D. Roggen, and G. Troester. 2009. Unsupervised classifier self-calibration through repeated context occurences: Is there robustness against sensor displacement to gain?. In Proc. ISWC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. M. Galar, A. Fernández, E. Barrenechea, H. Bustince, and F. Herrera. 2011. An overview of ensemble methods for binary classifiers in multi-class problems: Experimental study on one-vs-one and one-vs-all schemes. Pattern Recognition 44, 8 (2011), 1761--1776. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Y. Guan and T. Plötz. 2017. Ensembles of deep lstm learners for activity recognition using wearables. PACM IMWUT 1, 2 (2017), 11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. H. Guo, L. Chen, L. Peng, and G. Chen. Wearable sensor based multimodal human activity recognition exploiting the diversity of classifier ensemble. In Proc. Ubicomp. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Ha, J. Yun, and S. Choi. 2015. Multi-modal convolutional neural networks for activity recognition. In Proc. SMC. 3017--3022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. N. Hammerla, S. Halloran, and T. Plötz. 2016. Deep, Convolutional, and Recurrent Models for Human Activity Recognition using Wearables. Proc. IJCAI (2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. N. Hammerla, R. Kirkham, P. Andras, and T. Plötz. 2013. On preserving statistical characteristics of accelerometry data using their empirical cumulative distribution. In Proc. ISWC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. W. He, Y. Guo, C. Gao, andX. Li. 2012. Recognition of human activities with wearable sensors. EURASIP 2012, 1 (2012), 108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. T. Huynh and B. Schiele. 2005. Analyzing features for activity recognition. In Proc. SOAI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. A. Khan, N. Hammerla, S. Mellor, and T. Plötz. 2016. Optimising sampling rates for accelerometer-based human activity recognition. PRL 73 (2016), 33--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. T. Miu, P. Missier, and T. Plötz. 2015. Bootstrapping personalised human activity recognition models using online active learning. In Proc. IUCC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. Münzner, P. Schmidt, A. Reiss, M. Hanselmann, R. Stiefelhagen, and R. Dürichen. 2017. CNN-based sensor fusion techniques for multimodal human activity recognition. In Proc. ISWC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. L. Nguyen, M. Zeng, P. Tague, and J. Zhang. 2015. Recognizing new activities with limited training data. In Proc. ISWC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. F. Ordóñez and D. Roggen. 2016. Deep convolutional and lstm recurrent neural networks for multimodal wearable activity recognition. Sensors 16, 1 (2016), 115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A. Reiss and D. Stricker. 2012. Creating and benchmarking a new dataset for physical activity monitoring. In Proc. ICPTRAE. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. Savvaki, G. Tsagkatakis, A. Panousopoulou, and P. Tsakalides. 2017. Matrix and Tensor Completion on a Human Activity Recognition Framework. J Biomed Health Inform 21, 6 (2017), 1554--1561.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. B. Su, J. Jiang, Q. Tang, and M. Sheng. 2016. Human periodic activity recognition based on functional features. In Proc. SIGGRAPH. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. J. Wu, J. Wang, Y. Ling, and H. Xu. 2017. AnAdvanced Hybrid Technique of DCS and JSRC for Telemonitoring of Multi-Sensor Gait Pattern. Sensors 17, 12 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. Wu and H. Xu. 2016. An advanced scheme of compressed sensing of acceleration data for telemonintoring of human gait. Biomedical engineering online 15, 1 (2016), 27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ISWC '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
    October 2018
    307 pages
    ISBN:9781450359672
    DOI:10.1145/3267242

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 8 October 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate38of196submissions,19%

    Upcoming Conference

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader