skip to main content
10.1145/3269206.3269290acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Hybrid Deep Sequential Modeling for Social Text-Driven Stock Prediction

Authors Info & Claims
Published:17 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In addition to only considering stocks' price series, utilizing short and instant texts from social medias like Twitter has potential to yield better stock market prediction. While some previous approaches have explored this direction, their results are still far from satisfactory due to their reliance on performance of sentiment analysis and limited capabilities of learning direct relations between target stock trends and their daily social texts. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel Cross-modal attention based Hybrid Recurrent Neural Network (CH-RNN), which is inspired by the recent proposed DA-RNN model. Specifically, CH-RNN consists of two essential modules. One adopts DA-RNN to gain stock trend representations for different stocks. The other utilizes recurrent neural network to model daily aggregated social texts. These two modules interact seamlessly by the following two manners: 1) daily representations of target stock trends from the first module are leveraged to select trend-related social texts through a cross-modal attention mechanism, and 2) representations of text sequences and trend series are further integrated. The comprehensive experiments on the real dataset we build demonstrate the effectiveness of CH-RNN and benefit of considering social texts.

References

  1. Werner FM Bondt and Richard Thaler. 1985. Does the stock market overreact? The Journal of finance , Vol. 40, 3 (1985), 793--805.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Zhiyuan Cheng, James Caverlee, and Kyumin Lee. 2010. You are where you tweet: a content-based approach to geo-locating twitter users. In CIKM . 759--768. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Michael P Clements and David F Hendry. 1969. Fitting autoregressive models for prediction. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics , Vol. 21, 1 (1969), 243--247.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Xiao Ding, Yue Zhang, Ting Liu, and Junwen Duan. 2015. Deep learning for event-driven stock prediction.. In IJCAI. 2327--2333. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Shimon Kogan, Dimitry Levin, Bryan R Routledge, Jacob S Sagi, and Noah A Smith. 2009. Predicting risk from financial reports with regression. In NAACL. 272--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Thien Hai Nguyen and Kiyoaki Shirai. 2015. Topic modeling based sentiment analysis on social media for stock market prediction. In ACL , Vol. 1. 1354--1364.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yao Qin, Dongjin Song, Haifeng Chen, Wei Cheng, Guofei Jiang, and Garrison W. Cottrell. 2017. A Dual-Stage Attention-Based Recurrent Neural Network for Time Series Prediction. In IJCAI . 2627--2633. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jianfeng Si, Arjun Mukherjee, Bing Liu, Qing Li, Huayi Li, and Xiaotie Deng. 2013. Exploiting Topic based Twitter Sentiment for Stock Prediction. In ACL. 1779--1787.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jianfeng Si, Arjun Mukherjee, Bing Liu, Sinno Jialin Pan, Qing Li, and Huayi Li. 2014. Exploiting social relations and sentiment for stock prediction. In EMNLP . 1139--1145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Duyu Tang, Furu Wei, Nan Yang, Ming Zhou, Ting Liu, and Bing Qin. 2014. Learning sentiment-specific word embedding for twitter sentiment classification. In ACL . 1555--1565.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Allan Timmermann. 1996. Excess volatility and predictability of stock prices in autoregressive dividend models with learning. The Review of Economic Studies , Vol. 63, 4 (1996), 523--557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Wei Zhang, Wen Wang, Jun Wang, and Hongyuan Zha. 2018. User-guided Hierarchical Attention Network for Multi-modal Social Image Popularity Prediction. In WWW. 1277--1286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Bo Zhao, Yongji He, Chunfeng Yuan, and Yihua Huang. 2016. Stock market prediction exploiting microblog sentiment analysis. In IJCNN . 4482--4488.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Wayne Xin Zhao, Jing Jiang, Jianshu Weng, Jing He, Ee-Peng Lim, Hongfei Yan, and Xiaoming Li. 2011. Comparing twitter and traditional media using topic models. In ECIR. 338--349. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Hybrid Deep Sequential Modeling for Social Text-Driven Stock Prediction

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CIKM '18: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
        October 2018
        2362 pages
        ISBN:9781450360142
        DOI:10.1145/3269206

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 October 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        CIKM '18 Paper Acceptance Rate147of826submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader