skip to main content
10.1145/3282894.3282898acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmumConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

VRHapticDrones: Providing Haptics in Virtual Reality through Quadcopters

Published:25 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present VRHapticDrones, a system utilizing quadcopters as levitating haptic feedback proxy. A touchable surface is attached to the side of the quadcopters to provide unintrusive, flexible, and programmable haptic feedback in virtual reality. Since the users' sense of presence in virtual reality is a crucial factor for the overall user experience, our system simulates haptic feedback of virtual objects. Quadcopters are dynamically positioned to provide haptic feedback relative to the physical interaction space of the user. In a first user study, we demonstrate that haptic feedback provided by VRHapticDrones significantly increases users' sense of presence compared to vibrotactile controllers and interactions without additional haptic feedback. In a second user study, we explored the quality of induced feedback regarding the expected feeling of different objects. Results show that VRHapticDrones is best suited to simulate objects that are expected to feel either light-weight or have yielding surfaces. With VRHapticDrones we contribute a solution to provide unintrusive and flexible feedback as well as insights for future VR haptic feedback systems.

References

  1. Muhammad Abdullah, Minji Kim, Waseem Hassan, Yoshihiro Kuroda, and Seokhee Jeon. 2017. HapticDrone: An Encountered-Type Kinesthetic Haptic Interface with Controllable Force Feedback: Initial Example for 1D Haptic Feedback. In Adjunct Publication of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 115--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Parastoo Abtahi, David Y. Zhao, L. E. Jane, and James A. Landay. 2017. Drone Near Me: Exploring Touch-Based Human-Drone Interaction. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 3, Article 34 (Sept. 2017), 8 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Bruno Araujo, Ricardo Jota, Varun Perumal, Jia Xian Yao, Karan Singh, and Daniel Wigdor. 2016. Snake Charmer: Physically Enabling Virtual Objects. In Proceedings of the TEI'16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 218--226. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Mauro Avila, Markus Funk, and Niels Henze. 2015. Dronenavigator: Using drones for navigating visually impaired persons. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility. ACM, 327--328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Mahdi Azmandian, Mark Hancock, Hrvoje Benko, Eyal Ofek, and Andrew D Wilson. 2016. Haptic retargeting: Dynamic repurposing of passive haptics for enhanced virtual reality experiences. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1968--1979. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hrvoje Benko, Christian Holz, Mike Sinclair, and Eyal Ofek. 2016. NormalTouch and TextureTouch: High-fidelity 3D Haptic Shape Rendering on Handheld Virtual Reality Controllers. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 717--728. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jonathan Blake and Hakan B Gurocak. 2009. Haptic glove with MR brakes for virtual reality. IEEE/ASME Transactions On Mechatronics 14, 5 (2009), 606--615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Grigore C Burdea. 2000. Haptics issues in virtual environments. In Computer Graphics International, 2000. Proceedings. IEEE, 295--302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lung-Pan Cheng, Patrick Lühne, Pedro Lopes, Christoph Sterz, and Patrick Baudisch. 2014. Haptic turk: a motion platform based on people. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 3463--3472. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Lung-Pan Cheng, Thijs Roumen, Hannes Rantzsch, Sven Köhler, Patrick Schmidt, Robert Kovacs, Johannes Jasper, Jonas Kemper, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Turkdeck: Physical virtual reality based on people. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology. ACM, 417--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Ashley Colley, Lasse Virtanen, Pascal Knierim, and Jonna Häkkilä. 2017. Investigating Drone Motion As Pedestrian Guidance. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 143--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sean Follmer, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Akimitsu Hogge, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. inFORM: dynamic physical affordances and constraints through shape and object actuation.. In Uist, Vol. 13. 417--426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Markus Funk. 2018. Human-drone Interaction: Let's Get Ready for Flying User Interfaces! Interactions 25, 3 (April 2018), 78--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Antonio Gomes, Calvin Rubens, Sean Braley, and Roel Vertegaal. 2016. Bitdrones: Towards using 3d nanocopter displays as interactive self-levitating programmable matter. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 770--780. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Xiaochi Gu, Yifei Zhang, Weize Sun, Yuanzhe Bian, Dao Zhou, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2016. Dexmo: An Inexpensive and Lightweight Mechanical Exoskeleton for Motion Capture and Force Feedback in VR. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1991--1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jan Gugenheimer, Dennis Wolf, Eythor R Eiriksson, Pattie Maes, and Enrico Rukzio. 2016a. Gyrovr: Simulating inertia in virtual reality using head worn flywheels. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 227--232. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jan Gugenheimer, Dennis Wolf, Gabriel Haas, Sebastian Krebs, and Enrico Rukzio. 2016b. Swivrchair: A motorized swivel chair to nudge users' orientation for 360 degree storytelling in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1996--2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Zhenyi He, Fengyuan Zhu, Aaron Gaudette, and Ken Perlin. 2017. Robotic Haptic Proxies for Collaborative Virtual Reality. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.08879 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Seongkook Heo, Christina Chung, Geehyuk Lee, and Daniel Wigdor. 2018. Thor's Hammer: An Ungrounded Force Feedback Device Utilizing Propeller-Induced Propulsive Force. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 525, 11 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Anuruddha Hettiarachchi and Daniel Wigdor. 2016. Annexing reality: Enabling opportunistic use of everyday objects as tangible proxies in augmented reality. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1957--1967. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Seungzoo Jeong, Naoki Hashimoto, and Sato Makoto. 2004. A Novel Interaction System with Force Feedback Between Real - and Virtual Human: An Entertainment System: "Virtual Catch Ball". In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 61--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Pascal Knierim, Thomas Kosch, Alexander Achberger, and Markus Funk. 2018. Flyables: Exploring 3D Interaction Spaces for Levitating Tangibles. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Pascal Knierim, Thomas Kosch, Valentin Schwind, Markus Funk, Francisco Kiss, Stefan Schneegass, and Niels Henze. 2017. Tactile Drones-Providing Immersive Tactile Feedback in Virtual Reality through Quadcopters. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 433--436. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Pascal Knierim, Steffen Maurer, Katrin Wolf, and Markus Funk. 2018. Quadcopter-Projected In-Situ Navigation Cues for Improved Location Awareness. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 433, 6 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Thomas Kosch, Markus Funk, Daniel Vietz, Marc Weise, Tamara Müller, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2018. DroneCTRL: A Tangible Remote Input Control for Quadcopters. Proceedings of the 31th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (2018). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Robert W Lindeman, Yasuyuki Yanagida, Haruo Noma, and Kenichi Hosaka. 2006. Wearable vibrotactile systems for virtual contact and information display. Virtual Reality 9, 2-3 (2006), 203--213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Pedro Lopes, Alexandra Ion, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Impacto: Simulating physical impact by combining tactile stimulation with electrical muscle stimulation. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology. ACM, 11--19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Pedro Lopes, Sijing You, Lung-Pan Cheng, Sebastian Marwecki, and Patrick Baudisch. 2017. Providing Haptics to Walls & Heavy Objects in Virtual Reality by Means of Electrical Muscle Stimulation. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1471--1482. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Kazuki Nagai, Soma Tanoue, Katsuhito Akahane, and Makoto Sato. 2015. Wearable 6-DoF wrist haptic device SPIDAR-W. In SIGGRAPH Asia 2015 Haptic Media And Contents Design. ACM, 19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jürgen Scheible, Markus Funk, Klen Copic Pucihar, Matjaz Kljun, Mark Lochrie, Paul Egglestone, and Peter Skrlj. 2017. Using Drones for Art and Exergaming. IEEE Pervasive Computing 16, 1 (2017), 48--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Dominik Schmidt, Rob Kovacs, Vikram Mehta, Udayan Umapathi, Sven Köhler, Lung-Pan Cheng, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Level-ups: Motorized stilts that simulate stair steps in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2157--2160. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Valentin Schwind, Pascal Knierim, Cagri Tasci, Patrick Franczak, Nico Haas, and Niels Henze. 2017. "These are not my hands!": Effect of Gender on the Perception of Avatar Hands in Virtual Reality. In CHI '17 Proceedings of the 2017 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction (2017-01-01). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA. Honorable Mention Award. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Beat Signer and Timothy J Curtin. 2017. Tangible Holograms: Towards Mobile Physical Augmentation of Virtual Objects. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.08288 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Adalberto L Simeone, Eduardo Velloso, and Hans Gellersen. 2015. Substitutional reality: Using the physical environment to design virtual reality experiences. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3307--3316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Qi Sun, Li-Yi Wei, and Arie Kaufman. 2016. Mapping Virtual and Physical Reality. ACM Trans. Graph. 35, 4, Article 64 (July 2016), 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Koji Tsukada and Michiaki Yasumura. 2004. Activebelt: Belt-type wearable tactile display for directional navigation. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. Springer, 384--399.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Bob G. Witmer and Michael J. Singer. 1998. Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 7, 3 (June 1998), 225--240. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Katrin Wolf and Timm Bäder. 2015. Illusion of surface changes induced by tactile and visual touch feedback. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1355--1360. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Kotaro Yamaguchi, Ginga Kato, Yoshihiro Kuroda, Kiyoshi Kiyokawa, and Haruo Takemura. 2016. A Non-grounded and Encountered-type Haptic Display Using a Drone. In Proceedings of the 2016 Symposium on Spatial User Interaction. ACM, 43--46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. VRHapticDrones: Providing Haptics in Virtual Reality through Quadcopters

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        MUM '18: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia
        November 2018
        548 pages
        ISBN:9781450365949
        DOI:10.1145/3282894

        Copyright © 2018 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 November 2018

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        MUM '18 Paper Acceptance Rate37of82submissions,45%Overall Acceptance Rate190of465submissions,41%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader