skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300282acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

BBeep: A Sonic Collision Avoidance System for Blind Travellers and Nearby Pedestrians

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present an assistive suitcase system, BBeep, for supporting blind people when walking through crowded environments. BBeep uses pre-emptive sound notifications to help clear a path by alerting both the user and nearby pedestrians about the potential risk of collision. BBeep triggers notifications by tracking pedestrians, predicting their future position in real-time, and provides sound notifications only when it anticipates a future collision. We investigate how different types and timings of sound affect nearby pedestrian behavior. In our experiments, we found that sound emission timing has a significant impact on nearby pedestrian trajectories when compared to different sound types. Based on these findings, we performed a real-world user study at an international airport, where blind participants navigated with the suitcase in crowded areas. We observed that the proposed system significantly reduces the number of imminent collisions.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper052p.mp4

mp4

2.1 MB

References

  1. Dragan Ahmetovic, Cole Gleason, Chengxiong Ruan, Kris Kitani, Hironobu Takagi, and Chieko Asakawa. 2016. NavCog: a navigational cognitive assistant for the blind. In Proc. ACM Conference on HumanComputer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '16). ACM, 90--99. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Tomohiro Amemiya, Jun Yamashita, Koichi Hirota, and Michitaka Hirose. 2004. Virtual leading blocks for the deaf-blind: A real-time way-finder by verbal-nonverbal hybrid interface and high-density RFID tag space. In Proc. IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality (VR '04). IEEE, 165--287. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mauro Avila Soto, Markus Funk, Matthias Hoppe, Robin Boldt, Katrin Wolf, and Niels Henze. 2017. DroneNavigator: Using Leashed and Free-Floating Quadcopters to Navigate Visually Impaired Travelers. In Proc. ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and accessibility (ASSETS '17). ACM, 300--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. JM Bengamin. 1973. The new C-5 laser cane for the blind. In Conference on the electronic prosthetics, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. BB Blasch, SJ LaGrow, and WR De l'Aune. 1996. Three aspects of coverage provided by the long cane: Object, surface, and foot-placement preview. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness 90 (1996), 295-- 301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. GP Boucek Jr, James E Veitengruber, and Wayne D Smith. 1977. Aircraft alerting systems criteria study. Volume II. Human factors guidelines for aircraft alerting systems. Technical Report. BOEING COMMERCIAL AIRPLANE CO SEATTLE WA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Michael Brock and Per Ola Kristensson. 2013. Supporting blind navigation using depth sensing and sonification. In Proc. ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication (UbiComp '13). ACM, 255--258. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Zhe Cao, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei, and Yaser Sheikh. 2017. Realtime Multi-person 2D Pose Estimation Using Part Affinity Fields. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '17). IEEE, 1302--1310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ping-Ling Chen, Wafaa Saleh, and Chih-Wei Pai. 2017. Texting and walking: a controlled field study of crossing behaviours and inattentional blindness in Taiwan. Behaviour & Information Technology 36, 4 (2017), 435--445. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Sakmongkon Chumkamon, Peranitti Tuvaphanthaphiphat, and Phongsak Keeratiwintakorn. 2008. A blind navigation system using RFID for indoor environments. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON '08), Vol. 2. IEEE, 765--768.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Karen Duarte, José Cecílio, and Pedro Furtado. 2014. Easily guiding of blind: Providing information and navigation-smartnav. In Wireless Internet. Springer, 129--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Judy Edworthy, Sarah Loxley, and Ian Dennis. 1991. Improving auditory warning design: Relationship between warning sound parameters and perceived urgency. Human factors 33, 2 (1991), 205--231.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Navid Fallah, Ilias Apostolopoulos, Kostas Bekris, and Eelke Folmer. 2012. The user as a sensor: navigating users with visual impairments in indoor spaces using tactile landmarks. In Proc. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, 425--432. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Navid Fallah, Ilias Apostolopoulos, Kostas Bekris, and Eelke Folmer. 2013. Indoor human navigation systems: A survey. Interacting with Computers 25, 1 (2013), 21--33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. José Faria, Sérgio Lopes, Hugo Fernandes, Paulo Martins, and João Barroso. 2010. Electronic white cane for blind people navigation assistance. In Proc. IEEE Conference on World Automation Congress (WAC '10). IEEE, 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Vítor Filipe, Filipe Fernandes, Hugo Fernandes, António Sousa, Hugo Paredes, and João Barroso. 2012. Blind navigation support system based on Microsoft Kinect. Procedia Computer Science 14 (2012), 94-- 101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Masahiro Furukawa, Hiromi Yoshikawa, Taku Hachisu, Shogo Fukushima, and Hiroyuki Kajimoto. 2011. "Vection field" for pedestrian traffic control. In Proc. ACM International Conference on Augmented Human (AH '11). ACM, 19. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Thomas Gallagher, Elyse Wise, Binghao Li, Andrew G Dempster, Chris Rizos, and Euan Ramsey-Stewart. 2012. Indoor positioning system based on sensor fusion for the blind and visually impaired. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN '12). IEEE, 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Christian Gonzalez, Bridget A Lewis, Daniel M Roberts, Stephanie M Pratt, and Carryl L Baldwin. 2012. Perceived urgency and annoyance of auditory alerts in a driving context. 56, 1 (2012), 1684--1687.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellen C Haas and Judy Edworthy. 1996. Designing urgency into auditory warnings using pitch, speed and loudness. Computing & Control Engineering Journal 7, 4 (1996), 193--198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Juan David Hincapié-Ramos and Pourang Irani. 2013. CrashAlert: enhancing peripheral alertness for eyes-busy mobile interaction while walking. In Proc. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '13). ACM, 3385--3388. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Hsieh-Chang Huang, Ching-Tang Hsieh, and Cheng-Hsiang Yeh. 2015. An indoor obstacle detection system using depth information and region growth. Sensors 15, 10 (2015), 27116--27141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Andreas Hub, Joachim Diepstraten, and Thomas Ertl. 2004. Design and development of an indoor navigation and object identification system for the blind. In Proc. ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and accessibility (ASSETS '04). ACM, 147--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kiyohide Ito, Makoto Okamoto, Junichi Akita, Tetsuo Ono, Ikuko Gyobu, Tomohito Takagi, Takahiro Hoshi, and Yu Mishima. 2005. CyARM: an alternative aid device for blind persons. In Proc. ACM CHI Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05). ACM, 1483--1488. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Beomjoon Kim and Joelle Pineau. 2016. Socially Adaptive Path Planning in Human Environments Using Inverse Reinforcement Learning. International Journal of Social Robotics 8, 1 (2016), 51--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Jee-Eun Kim, Masahiro Bessho, Shinsuke Kobayashi, Noboru Koshizuka, and Ken Sakamura. 2016. Navigating visually impaired travelers in a large train station using smartphone and bluetooth low energy. In Proc. ACM Annual Symposium on Applied Computing (AC '16). ACM, 604--611. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Kris M. Kitani, Brian D. Ziebart, James Andrew Bagnell, and Martial Hebert. 2012. Activity Forecasting. In Proc. IEEE European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV '12), Andrew Fitzgibbon, Svetlana Lazebnik, Pietro Perona, Yoichi Sato, and Cordelia Schmid (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 201--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Vladimir Kulyukin, Chaitanya Gharpure, John Nicholson, and Grayson Osborne. 2006. Robot-assisted wayfinding for the visually impaired in structured indoor environments. Autonomous Robots 21, 1 (2006), 29--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Bing Li, J Pablo Munoz, Xuejian Rong, Jizhong Xiao, Yingli Tian, and Aries Arditi. 2016. ISANA: wearable context-aware indoor assistive navigation with obstacle avoidance for the blind. In Proc. IEEE European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV '16). Springer, 448--462.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Shachar Maidenbaum, Shlomi Hanassy, Sami Abboud, Galit Buchs, Daniel-Robert Chebat, Shelly Levy-Tzedek, and Amir Amedi. 2014. The "EyeCane", a new electronic travel aid for the blind: Technology, behavior & swift learning. Restorative neurology and neuroscience 32, 6 (2014), 813--824.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Roberto Manduchi, Sri Kurniawan, and Homayoun Bagherinia. 2010. Blind guidance using mobile computer vision: A usability study. In Proc. ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and accessibility (ASSETS '10). ACM, 241--242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Dawn C Marshall, John D Lee, and P Albert Austria. 2007. Alerts for in-vehicle information systems: Annoyance, urgency, and appropriateness. Human factors 49, 1 (2007), 145--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Edward Marshall and Sue Baker. 1995. Alarms in nuclear power plant control rooms: current approaches and future design. In Human factors in alarm design. Taylor & Francis, Inc., 183--191. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Christina Meredith and Judy Edworthy. 1995. Are there too many alarms in the intensive care unit? An overview of the problems. Journal of advanced nursing 21, 1 (1995), 15--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Madoka Nakajima and Shinichiro Haruyama. 2012. Indoor navigation system for visually impaired people using visible light communication and compensated geomagnetic sensing. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC '12). IEEE, 524--529.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Helen Petrie, Valerie Johnson, Thomas Strothotte, Andreas Raab, Steffi Fritz, and Rainer Michel. 1996. MoBIC: Designing a travel aid for blind and elderly people. The Journal of Navigation 49, 1 (1996), 45--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Huy-Hieu Pham, Thi-Lan Le, and Nicolas Vuillerme. 2016. Real-time obstacle detection system in indoor environment for the visually impaired using microsoft kinect sensor. Journal of Sensors 2016 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Ioannis Politis, Stephen A Brewster, and Frank Pollick. 2014. Evaluating multimodal driver displays under varying situational urgency. In Proc. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, 4067--4076. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Lisa Ran, Sumi Helal, and Steve Moore. 2004. Drishti: an integrated indoor/outdoor blind navigation system and service. In Proc. the Second IEEE Annual Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom '04). IEEE, 23--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Joseph Redmon and Ali Farhadi. 2017. YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Stronger. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '17). IEEE, 6517--6525.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Shadan Sadeghian Borojeni, Susanne CJ Boll, Wilko Heuten, Heinrich H Bülthoff, and Lewis Chuang. 2018. Feel the Movement: Real Motion Influences Responses to Take-over Requests in Highly Automated Vehicles. In Proc. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, 246. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Daisuke Sato, Uran Oh, Kakuya Naito, Hironobu Takagi, Kris Kitani, and Chieko Asakawa. 2017. Navcog3: An evaluation of a smartphonebased blind indoor navigation assistant with semantic features in a large-scale environment. In Proc. ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '17). ACM, 270--279. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Shraga Shoval, Johann Borenstein, and Yoram Koren. 1994. Mobile robot obstacle avoidance in a computerized travel aid for the blind. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE, 2023--2028.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Shraga Shoval, Johann Borenstein, and Yoram Koren. 1998. The Navbelt-A computerized travel aid for the blind based on mobile robotics technology. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 45, 11 (1998), 1376--1386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Yu-Chih Tung and Kang G Shin. 2018. Use of Phone Sensors to Enhance Distracted Pedestrians' Safety. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 17, 6 (2018), 1469--1482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Iwan Ulrich and Johann Borenstein. 2001. The GuideCane-applying mobile robot technologies to assist the visually impaired. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans 31, 2 (2001), 131--136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. William R Wiener, Richard L Welsh, and Bruce B Blasch. 2010. Foundations of orientation and mobility. Vol. 1. American Foundation for the Blind.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Takuma Yagi, Karttikeya Mangalam, Ryo Yonetani, and Yoichi Sato. 2018. Future Person Localization in First-Person Videos. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '18).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Cang Ye, Soonhac Hong, Xiangfei Qian, and Wei Wu. 2016. Co-robotic cane: A new robotic navigation aid for the visually impaired. IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Magazine 2, 2 (2016), 33--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Limin Zeng, Markus Simros, and Gerhard Weber. 2017. Camera-based mobile electronic travel aids support for cognitive mapping of unknown spaces. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '17). ACM, 8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Xucong Zhang, Yusuke Sugano, Mario Fritz, and Andreas Bulling. 2017. Mpiigaze: Real-world dataset and deep appearance-based gaze estimation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. BBeep: A Sonic Collision Avoidance System for Blind Travellers and Nearby Pedestrians

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2019
        9077 pages
        ISBN:9781450359702
        DOI:10.1145/3290605

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 May 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format