skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300481acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Recipes for Programmable Money

Authors Info & Claims
Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a qualitative study of the recent integration of a UK-based, digital-first mobile banking app - Monzo - with the web automation service IFTTT (If This Then That). Through analysis of 113 unique IFTTT 'recipes' shared by Monzo users on public community forums, we illustrate the potentially diverse functions of these recipes, and how they are achieved through different kinds of automation. Beyond achieving more convenient and efficient financial management, we note many playful and expressive applications of conditionality and automation that far extend traditional functions of banking applications and infrastructure. We use these findings to map opportunities, challenges and areas of future research in the development of 'programmable money' and related financial technologies. Specifically, we present design implications for the extension of native digital banking applications; novel uses of banking data; the applicability of blockchains and smart contracts; and future forms of financial autonomy.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Amelia Acker and Dhiraj Murthy. 2018. Venmo: Understanding Mobile Payments As Social Media. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Media and Society, 5--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. George Okello Candiya Bongomin, Joseph M Ntayi, John C. Munene, and Charles Akol Malinga. 2018. Mobile Money and Financial Inclusion in Sub-Saharan Africa: the Moderating Role of Social Networks. Journal of African Business 19, 3 (2018), 361--384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Monica Caraway, Daniel A. Epstein, and Sean A. Munson. 2017. Friends Don't Need Receipts: The Curious Case of Social Awareness Streams in the Mobile Payment App Venmo. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 28 (Dec. 2017), 28:1--28:17 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ruth Catlow, Mark Garrett, Nathan Jones, and Sam Skinner. 2017. Artists Re:thinking the Blockchain. Liverpool University Press. https: //liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/products/100826Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Eun Kyoung Choe, Nicole B. Lee, Bongshin Lee, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A. Kientz. 2014. Understanding Quantified-selfers' Practices in Collecting and Exploring Personal Data. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1143--1152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Mary Daly. 2017. Money-Related Meanings and Practices in LowIncome and Poor Families. Sociology 51, 2 (2017), 450--465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Sinclair Davidson, Primavera De Filippi, and Jason Potts. 2016. Disrupting Governance: The New Institutional Economics of Distributed Ledger Technology. Technical Report. Rochester, NY. https://papers.ssrn.com/ abstract=2811995 {Online; accessed 2018-09--20}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Chris Elsden, Abigail C. Durrant, David Chatting, and David S. Kirk. 2017. Designing Documentary Informatics. Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 649-- 661. https://doi.org/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 1145/3064663.3064714 {10} Chris Elsden, Arthi Manohar, Jo Briggs, Mike Harding, Chris Speed, and John Vines. 2018. Making Sense of Blockchain Applications: A Typology for HCI. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 458:1--458:14. CHI 2019, May 4--9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland Uk Elsden, Feltwell, Lawson, Vines. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Chris Elsden, Mark Selby, Abigail Durrant, and David Kirk. 2016. Fitter, happier, more productive: what to ask of a data-driven life. interactions 23, 5 (2016), 45--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jennifer Ferreira and Mark Perry. 2014. Building an Alternative Social Currency: Dematerialising and Rematerialising Digital Money Across Media. Proceedings of HCI Korea, 122--131. http://dl.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=2729485.2729505 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mark Granovetter. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociology 91, 3 (1 11 1985), 481--510.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. IBM. 2018. Programmable money: Will central banks take the lead? Technical Report. http://www.ibm.com/services/us/gbs/thoughtleadership/ programmablemoney/ {Online; accessed 2018-09--21}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Joseph Jofish Kaye, Mary McCuistion, Rebecca Gulotta, and David A. Shamma. 2014. Money Talks: Tracking Personal Finances. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 521--530. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Yong Ming Kow, Xinning Gui, and Waikuen Cheng. 2017. Special Digital Monies: The Design of Alipay and WeChat Wallet for Mobile Payment Practices in China. Human-Computer Interaction -- INTERACT 2017, 136--155. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Deepti Kumar, David Martin, and Jacki O'Neill. 2011. The Times They Are A-changin': Mobile Payments in India. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'11), 1413--1422. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. C. Lustig and B. Nardi. 2015. Algorithmic Authority: The Case of Bitcoin. 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 743--752. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Donald MacKenzie, Daniel Beunza, Yuval Millo, and Juan Pablo PardoGuerra. 2012. Drilling Through the Allegheny Mountains. Journal of Cultural Economy 5, 3 (2012), 279--296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Bill Maurer. 2006. The anthropology of money. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 35 (2006), 15--36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Bill Maurer, Taylor C. Nelms, and Lana Swartz. 2013. When perhaps the real problem is money itself!: the practical materiality of Bitcoin. Social Semiotics 23, 2 (2013), 261--277.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Isaac Mbiti and David N Weil. 2011. Mobile Banking: The Impact of MPesa in Kenya. Technical Report. http://www.nber.org/papers/w17129Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Apurv Mehra, Srihari Muralidhar, Sambhav Satija, Anupama Dhareshwar, and Jacki O'Neill. 2018. Prayana: Intermediated Financial Management in Resource-Constrained Settings. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 389:1--389:13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Sarah Mennicken, Jo Vermeulen, and Elaine M. Huang. 2014. From Today's Augmented Houses to Tomorrow's Smart Homes: New Directions for Home Automation Research. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 105--115. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Monzo. 2018. Automate your financial life with Monzo and IFTTT. https://monzo.com/blog/2018/06/07/monzo-on-ifttt/ {Online; accessed 2018-09--20}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Monzo. 2018. The Internet of Banking. https://www.youtube.com/ watch?v=c5jbaC5Kdvs {Online; accessed 2018-09--21}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mark W. Newman, Ame Elliott, and Trevor F. Smith. 2008. Providing an Integrated User Experience of Networked Media, Devices, and Services through End-User Composition. Pervasive Computing, 213-- 227. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Bettina Nissen, Larissa Pschetz, Dave Murray-Rust, Hadi Mehrpouya, Shaune Oosthuizen, and Chris Speed. 2018. GeoCoin: Supporting Ideation and Collaborative Design with Smart Contracts. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 163:1--163:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Bettina Nissen, Kate Symons, Ella Tallyn, Chris Speed, Deborah Maxwell, and John Vines. 2017. New Value Transactions: Understanding and Designing for Distributed Autonomous Organisations. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems, 352--355. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Joyojeet Pal, Priyank Chandra, Vaishnav Kameswaran, Aakanksha Parameshwar, Sneha Joshi, and Aditya Johri. 2018. Digital Payment and Its Discontents: Street Shops and the Indian Government's Push for Cashless Transactions. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 229:1--229:13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Mark Perry and Jennifer Ferreira. 2018. Moneywork: Practices of Use and Social Interaction Around Digital and Analog Money. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 24, 6 (2018), 41:1--41:32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Gary Pritchard, John Vines, and Patrick Olivier. 2015. Your Money's No Good Here: The Elimination of Cash Payment on London Buses. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 907--916. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Larissa Pschetz, Ella Tallyn, Rory Gianni, and Chris Speed. 2017. Bitbarista: Exploring Perceptions of Data Transactions in the Internet of Things. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2964--2975. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers Chalmers. 2014. Personal Tracking As Lived Informatics. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1163--1172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Jessica Silver-Greenberg and Michael Corkery. 2014. Miss a Payment? Good Luck Moving That Car. https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/09/ 24/miss-a-payment-good-luck-moving-that-car/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Cass R. Sunstein. 1999. Free markets and social justice. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Milijana Surbatovich, Jassim Aljuraidan, Lujo Bauer, Anupam Das, and Limin Jia. 2017. Some Recipes Can Do More Than Spoil Your Appetite: Analyzing the Security and Privacy Risks of IFTTT Recipes. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, 1501--1510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Ella Tallyn, Larissa Pschetz, Rory Gianni, Chris Speed, and Chris Elsden. 2018. Exploring Machine Autonomy and Provenance Data in Coffee Consumption: A Field Study of Bitbarista. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 170 (Nov. 2018), 25 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Blase Ur, Melwyn Pak Yong Ho, Stephen Brawner, Jiyun Lee, Sarah Mennicken, Noah Picard, Diane Schulze, and Michael L. Littman. 2016. Trigger-Action Programming in the Wild: An Analysis of 200,000 IFTTT Recipes. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3227--3231. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. John Vines, Paul Dunphy, Mark Blythe, Stephen Lindsay, Andrew Monk, and Patrick Olivier. 2012. The Joy of Cheques: Trust, Paper and Eighty Somethings. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 147--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. John Vines, Paul Dunphy, and Andrew Monk. 2014. Pay or Delay: The Role of Technology when Managing a Low Income. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 501--510. Recipes for Programmable Money CHI 2019, May 4--9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland Uk Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Dhaval Vyas, Stephen Snow, Paul Roe, and Margot Brereton. 2016. Social Organization of Household Finance: Understanding Artful Financial Systems in the Home. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1777-- 1789. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Wikipedia. 2018. The Lady in Red (Chris de Burgh song). https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Lady_in_Red_ (Chris_de_Burgh_song)&oldid=860467651 Page Version ID: 860467651.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Viviana A. Zelizer. 1989. The Social Meaning of Money: "Special Monies". Amer. J. Sociology 95, 2 (1989), 342--377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Viviana A Zelizer. 2000. The purchase of intimacy. Law & Social Inquiry 25, 3 (2000), 817--848.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Recipes for Programmable Money

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2019
        9077 pages
        ISBN:9781450359702
        DOI:10.1145/3290605

        Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

        This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 May 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format