skip to main content
10.1145/3290605.3300889acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Who Would You Like to Work With?

Published:02 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

People and organizations are increasingly using online platforms to assemble teams. In response, HCI researchers have theorized frameworks and created systems to support team assembly. However, little is known about how users search for and choose teammates on these platforms. We conducted a field study where 530 participants used a team formation system to assemble project teams. We describe how users' traits and social networks influence their teammate searches, teammate choices, and team composition. Our results show that (a) what users initially search for differs from what they finally choose: initially they search for experts and sociable users, but they are ultimately more likely to choose their prior social connections as their teammates; (b) users' decisions lead to non-diverse and segregated teams, where most of the expertise and social capital are concentrated in a few teams. We discuss the implications of these results for designing team formation systems than promote users' agency.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

paper659.mp4

mp4

291.8 MB

References

  1. Mark S. Ackerman. 2000. The intellectual challenge of CSCW: the gap between social requirements and technical feasibility. Human-- Computer Interaction 15, 2--3 (2000), 179--203. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Rakesh Agrawal, Behzad Golshan, and Evimaria Terzi. 2014. Grouping Students in Educational Settings. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1017--1026. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Oznur Alkan, Elizabeth M. Daly, and Inge Vejsbjerg. 2018. Opportunity Team Builder for Sales Teams. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 251--261. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Iheb Ben Amor, Salima Benbernou, Mourad Ouziri, Zaki Malik, and Brahim Medjahed. 2016. Discovering Best Teams for Data Leak-Aware Crowdsourcing in Social Networks. ACM Trans. Web 10, 1, Article 2 (Feb. 2016), 27 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Aris Anagnostopoulos, Luca Becchetti, Carlos Castillo, Aristides Gionis, and Stefano Leonardi. 2010. Power in Unity: Forming Teams in Large-scale Community Systems. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 599--608. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Deborah G. Ancona and David F. Caldwell. 1992. Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly 37, 4 (1992), 634--665. http://www.jstor. org/stable/2393475Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Pierre Balthazard, Richard E. Potter, and John Warren. 2004. Expertise, Extraversion and Group Interaction Styles As Performance Indicators in Virtual Teams: How Do Perceptions of IT's Performance Get Formed? SIGMIS Database 35, 1 (Feb. 2004), 41--64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gary S Becker. 1994. Human capital revisited. In Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education (3rd Edition). The University of Chicago Press, 15--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Suzanne T Bell. 2007. Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology 92, 3 (2007), 595.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Anthony S Bryk and Stephen W Raudenbush. 1992. Hierarchical linear models for social and behavioral research: Applications and data analysis methods.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Stuart Bunderson and Kathleen M. Sutcliffe. 2002. Comparing Alternative Conceptualizations of Functional Diversity in Management Teams: Process and Performance Effects. Academy of Management Journal 45, 5 (2002), 875--893. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.5465/3069319Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Iryna Bursuk, Andreas Mladenow, Niina Maarit Novak, and Christine Strauss. 2016. Online Cofounder Search in Tech Startups. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Integration and Webbased Applications and Services (iiWAS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 482--488. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ronald S. Burt. 1997. The Contingent Value of Social Capital. Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 2 (1997), 339--365. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/2393923Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Ronald S Burt et al. 2005. Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Cristina Cabanillas, Manuel Resinas, Jan Mendling, and Antonio RuizCortés. 2015. Automated Team Selection and Compliance Checking in Business Processes. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Software and System Process (ICSSP 2015). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 42--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Albert V. Carron and Lawrence R. Brawley. 2000. Cohesion: Conceptual and Measurement Issues. Small Group Research 31, 1 (2000), 89--106. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100105Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Tiziana Casciaro and Miguel Sousa Lobo. 2005. Competent jerks, lovable fools, and the formation of social networks. Harvard Business Review 83, 6 (2005), 92--99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. CBInsights. 2018. The Top 20 Reasons Startups Fail. https://www. cbinsights.com/research/startup-failure-reasons-top/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jilin Chen, Werner Geyer, Casey Dugan, Michael Muller, and Ido Guy. 2009. Make New Friends, but Keep the Old: Recommending People on Social Networking Sites. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 201--210. Who Would You Like to Work With? CHI 2019, May 4--9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland Uk Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Siu Yin Cheung, Yaping Gong, Mo Wang, Le (Betty) Zhou, and Junqi Shi. 2016. When and how does functional diversity influence team innovation? The mediating role of knowledge sharing and the moderation role of affect-based trust in a team. Human Relations 69, 7 (2016), 1507--1531. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715615684Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Alvin Chin, Bin Xu, and Hao Wang. 2013. Who Should I Add As a "Friend"?: A Study of Friend Recommendations Using Proximity and Homophily. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Modeling Social Media (MSM '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 7, 7 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. James S. Coleman. 1988. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. Amer. J. Sociology 94 (1988), S95--S120. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1086/228943Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Noshir Contractor. 2013. Some assembly required: leveraging Web science to understand and enable team assembly. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 371, 1987 (2013), 20120385. arXiv:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsta.2012.0385Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. David Coyle, James Moore, Per Ola Kristensson, Paul Fletcher, and Alan Blackwell. 2012. I Did That! Measuring Users' Experience of Agency in Their Own Actions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2025--2034. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Anwitaman Datta, Jackson Tan Teck Yong, and Anthony Ventresque. 2011. T-RecS: Team Recommendation System Through Expertise and Cohesiveness. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web (WWW '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 201--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. M Brent Donnellan, Frederick L Oswald, Brendan M Baird, and Richard E Lucas. 2006. The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological assessment 18, 2 (2006), 192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Emilio Ferrara, Onur Varol, Clayton Davis, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2016. The Rise of Social Bots. Commun. ACM 59, 7 (June 2016), 96--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Gerald R. Ferris, Darren C. Treadway, Robert W. Kolodinsky, Wayne A. Hochwarter, Charles J. Kacmar, Ceasar Douglas, and Dwight D. Frink. 2005. Development and Validation of the Political Skill Inventory. Journal of Management 31, 1 (2005), 126--152. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304271386Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Susan T. Fiske, Amy J.C. Cuddy, and Peter Glick. 2007. Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11, 2 (2007), 77 -- 83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Ge Gao, Pamela Hinds, and Chen Zhao. 2013. Closure vs. Structural Holes: How Social Network Information and Culture Affect Choice of Collaborators. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 5--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Gary Garrison, Robin L. Wakefield, Xiaobo Xu, and Sang Hyun Kim. 2010. Globally Distributed Teams: The Effect of Diversity on Trust, Cohesion and Individual Performance. SIGMIS Database 41, 3 (Aug. 2010), 27--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Lucy L. Gilson, M. Travis Maynard, Nicole C. Jones Young, Matti Vartiainen, and Marko Hakonen. 2015. Virtual Teams Research: 10 Years, 10 Themes, and 10 Opportunities. Journal of Management 41, 5 (2015), 1313--1337. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314559946Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Mark S. Granovetter. 1977. The Strength of Weak Ties11This paper originated in discussions with Harrison White, to whom I am indebted for many suggestions and ideas. Earlier drafts were read by Ivan Chase, James Davis, William Michelson, Nancy Lee, Peter Rossi, Charles Tilly, and an anonymous referee; their criticisms resulted in significant improvements. In Social Networks, Samuel Leinhardt (Ed.). Academic Press, 347 -- 367.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindred L Greer. 2014. Power in teams: Effects of team power structures on team conflict and team outcomes. Handbook of conflict management research (2014), 93--108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Roger Guimerà, Brian Uzzi, Jarrett Spiro, and Luís A. Nunes Amaral. 2005. Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance. Science 308, 5722 (2005), 697--702. arXiv:http://science.sciencemag.org/content/308/5722/697.full.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Ido Guy, Sigalit Ur, Inbal Ronen, Sara Weber, and Tolga Oral. 2012. Best Faces Forward: A Large-scale Study of People Search in the Enterprise. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1775--1784. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Pamela J Hinds, Kathleen M Carley, David Krackhardt, and Doug Wholey. 2000. Choosing Work Group Members: Balancing Similarity, Competence, and Familiarity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 81, 2 (2000), 226 -- 251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Rashina Hoda, James Noble, and Stuart Marshall. 2011. The impact of inadequate customer collaboration on self-organizing Agile teams. Information and Software Technology 53, 5 (2011), 521 -- 534. Special Section on Best Papers from XP2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Albert Hupa, Krzysztof Rzadca, Adam Wierzbicki, and Anwitaman Datta. 2010. Interdisciplinary Matchmaking: Choosing Collaborators by Skill, Acquaintance and Trust. Springer London, London, 319--347.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Farnaz Irannejad Bisafar, Aditya Ponnada, Ameneh Shamekhi, and Andrea G. Parker. 2017. A Sociotechnical Study of a Community-based Rewards Program: Insights on Building Social, Financial and Human Capital. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 55 (Dec. 2017), 21 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Christine L Jackson, Jason A Colquitt, Michael J Wesson, and Cindy P Zapata-Phelan. 2006. Psychological collectivism: A measurement validation and linkage to group member performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 91, 4 (2006), 884.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Farnaz Jahanbakhsh, Wai-Tat Fu, Karrie Karahalios, Darko Marinov, and Brian Bailey. 2017. You Want Me to Work with Who?: Stakeholder Perceptions of Automated Team Formation in Project-based Courses. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3201--3212. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Oskar Jarczyk, Blazej Gruszka, Szymon Jaroszewicz, Leszek Bukowski, and Adam Wierzbicki. 2014. GitHub Projects. Quality Analysis of Open-Source Software. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 80--94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Young Ji Kim, David Engel, Anita Williams Woolley, Jeffrey Yu-Ting Lin, Naomi McArthur, and Thomas W. Malone. 2017. What Makes a Strong Team?: Using Collective Intelligence to Predict Team Performance in League of Legends. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2316--2329. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Richard A Layton, Misty L Loughry, Matthew W Ohland, and George D Ricco. 2010. Design and Validation of a Web-Based System for Assigning Members to Teams Using Instructor-Specified Criteria. Advances in Engineering Education 2, 1 (2010), n1. CHI 2019, May 4--9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland Uk D. Gómez-Zará et al.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Michael Y. Lee and Amy C. Edmondson. 2017. Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior 37 (2017), 35 -- 58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Soo Ling Lim, Daniele Quercia, and Anthony Finkelstein. 2010. StakeNet: Using Social Networks to Analyse the Stakeholders of Large-scale Software Projects. In Proceedings of the 32Nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering - Volume 1 (ICSE '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 295--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Nan Lin. 2017. Building a network theory of social capital. In Social capital. Routledge, 3--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Alina Lungeanu, Dorothy R. Carter, Leslie A. DeChurch, and Noshir S. Contractor. 2018. How Team Interlock Ecosystems Shape the Assembly of Scientific Teams: A Hypergraph Approach. Communication Methods and Measures 12, 2--3 (2018), 174--198. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1430756Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Ioanna Lykourentzou, Robert E. Kraut, and Steven P. Dow. 2017. Team Dating Leads to Better Online Ad Hoc Collaborations. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2330--2343. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Elizabeth Mannix and Margaret A. Neale. 2005. What Differences Make a Difference?: The Promise and Reality of Diverse Teams in Organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 6, 2 (2005), 31--55. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529--1006.2005.00022.x PMID: 26158478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. John Mathieu, M. Travis Maynard, Tammy Rapp, and Lucy Gilson. 2008. Team Effectiveness 1997--2007: A Review of Recent Advancements and a Glimpse Into the Future. Journal of Management 34, 3 (2008), 410--476. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316061Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. John E. Mathieu, Scott I. Tannenbaum, Jamie S. Donsbach, and George M. Alliger. 2014. A Review and Integration of Team Composition Models: Moving Toward a Dynamic and Temporal Framework. Journal of Management 40, 1 (2014), 130--160. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313503014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Peter R Monge, Peter S Contractor, and Noshir S Contractor. 2003. Theories of communication networks. Oxford University Press, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Michael Muller, Kate Ehrlich, Tara Matthews, Adam Perer, Inbal Ronen, and Ido Guy. 2012. Diversity Among Enterprise Online Communities: Collaborating, Teaming, and Innovating Through Social Media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2815--2824. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Michael D. Mumford, Wayne A. Baughman, K. Victoria Threlfall, Charles E. Uhlman, and David P. Costanza. 1993. Personality, Adaptability, and Performance: Performance on WellDefined Problem Solving Tasks. Human Performance 6, 3 (1993), 241--285. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup0603_4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Janine Nahapiet and Sumantra Ghoshal. 1998. Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. The Academy of Management Review 23, 2 (1998), 242--266. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/259373Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Fernando Felix do Nascimento Junior, Allan Sales da Costa Melo, Igor Barbosa da Costa, and Leandro Balby Marinho. 2017. Profiling Successful Team Behaviors in League of Legends. In Proceedings of the 23rd Brazillian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web (WebMedia '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 261--268. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Clifford Nass and Youngme Moon. 2000. Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. Journal of Social Issues 56, 1 (2000), 81--103. arXiv:https://spssi.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/00224537.00153Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Catherine Neubauer, Joshua Woolley, Peter Khooshabeh, and Stefan Scherer. 2016. Getting to Know You: A Multimodal Investigation of Team Behavior and Resilience to Stress. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI 2016). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 193--200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Jacqueline Ng, Paul Leonardi, and Noshir Contractor. 2017. Teaming at the Limit: Enhancing Team Effectiveness with Enterprise Social Media Affordances. Academy of Management Proceedings 2017, 1 (2017), 13836. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2017.13Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Hongseok Oh, Giuseppe Labianca, and Myung-Ho Chung. 2006. A Multilevel Model of Group Social Capital. Academy of Management Review 31, 3 (2006), 569--582. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318918Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Paul Osterman. 1995. Skill, Training, and Work Organization in American Establishments. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 34, 2 (1995), 125--146. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1468232X.1995.tb00365.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Daniele Quercia and Licia Capra. 2009. FriendSensing: Recommending Friends Using Mobile Phones. In Proceedings of the Third ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 273--276. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Daniela Retelny, Sébastien Robaszkiewicz, Alexandra To, Walter S. Lasecki, Jay Patel, Negar Rahmati, Tulsee Doshi, Melissa Valentine, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2014. Expert Crowdsourcing with Flash Teams. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 75--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Lionel Robert and Daniel M. Romero. 2015. Crowd Size, Diversity and Performance. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1379--1382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Eduardo Salas, Rebecca Grossman, Ashley M. Hughes, and Chris W. Coultas. 2015. Measuring Team Cohesion: Observations from the Science. Human Factors 57, 3 (2015), 365--374. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720815578267 PMID: 25875429.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Niloufar Salehi, Andrew McCabe, Melissa Valentine, and Michael Bernstein. 2017. Huddler: Convening Stable and Familiar Crowd Teams Despite Unpredictable Availability. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1700--1713. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Ashay Saxena and Johanna Burmann. 2014. Factors Affecting Team Performance in Globally Distributed Setting. In Proceedings of the 52Nd ACM Conference on Computers and People Research (SIGSIM-CPR '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 25--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Aaron Schecter, Andrew Pilny, Alice Leung, Marshall Scott Poole, and Noshir Contractor. 2018. Step by step: Capturing the dynamics of work team process through relational event sequences. Journal of Organizational Behavior 39, 9 (2018), 1163--1181. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/job.2247Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Jan B. Schmutz, Zhike Lei, Walter J. Eppich, and Tanja Manser. {n. d.}. Reflection in the heat of the moment: The role of in-action team reflexivity in health care emergency teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior 39, 6 ({n. d.}), 749--765. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/job.2299 Who Would You Like to Work With? CHI 2019, May 4--9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland UkGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Matthew S. Smith. 2008. Social Capital in Online Communities. In Proceedings of the 2Nd PhD Workshop on Information and Knowledge Management (PIKM '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Howard Spoelstra, Peter van Rosmalen, Tilly Houtmans, and Peter Sloep. 2015. Team formation instruments to enhance learner interactions in open learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior 45 (2015), 11 -- 20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Pang-Ning Tan, Michael Steinbach, Anuj Karpatne, and Vipin Kumar. 2007. Introduction to Data Mining. Pearson Education. https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/program/ Tan-Introduction-to-Data-Mining-2nd-Edition/PGM214749.html Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Pamela Tierney and Steven M. Farmer. 2002. Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance. Academy of Management Journal 45, 6 (2002), 1137--1148. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.5465/3069429Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Erik H. Trainer, Arun Kalyanasundaram, Chalalai Chaihirunkarn, and James D. Herbsleb. 2016. How to Hackathon: Socio-technical Tradeoffs in Brief, Intensive Collocation. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1118--1130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Brian Uzzi, Satyam Mukherjee, Michael Stringer, and Ben Jones. 2013. Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact. Science 342, 6157 (2013), 468--472. arXiv:http://science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6157/468.full.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Bogdan Vasilescu, Daryl Posnett, Baishakhi Ray, Mark G.J. van den Brand, Alexander Serebrenik, Premkumar Devanbu, and Vladimir Filkov. 2015. Gender and Tenure Diversity in GitHub Teams. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3789--3798. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Stanley Wasserman and Katherine Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Wouter Weerkamp, Richard Berendsen, Bogomil Kovachev, Edgar Meij, Krisztian Balog, and Maarten de Rijke. 2011. People Searching for People: Analysis of a People Search Engine Log. In Proceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 45--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Miaomiao Wen, Keith Maki, Steven Dow, James D. Herbsleb, and Carolyn Rose. 2017. Supporting Virtual Team Formation Through Community-Wide Deliberation. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 109 (Dec. 2017), 19 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. Anita Williams Woolley, Christopher F. Chabris, Alex Pentland, Nada Hashmi, and Thomas W. Malone. 2010. Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups. Science 330, 6004 (2010), 686--688. arXiv:http://science.sciencemag.org/content/330/6004/686.full.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Y. Connie Yuan and Geri Gay. 2006. Homophily of Network Ties and Bonding and Bridging Social Capital in Computer-Mediated Distributed Teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 4 (2006), 1062--1084.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. Stephen J. Zaccaro. 1991. Nonequivalent Associations Between Forms of Cohesiveness and Group-Related Outcomes: Evidence for Multidimensionality. The Journal of Social Psychology 131, 3 (1991), 387--399. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1991.9713865Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. Jiawei Zhang, Yuanhua Lv, and Philip Yu. 2015. Enterprise Social Link Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 841--850. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  86. Chen Zhao, Pamela Hinds, and Ge Gao. 2012. How and to Whom People Share: The Role of Culture in Self-disclosure in Online Communities. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 67--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Sharon Zhou, Melissa Valentine, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2018. In Search of the Dream Team: Temporally Constrained Multi-Armed Bandits for Identifying Effective Team Structures. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 108, 13 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. Doug Zytko, Guo Freeman, Sukeshini A. Grandhi, Susan C. Herring, and Quentin (Gad) Jones. 2015. Enhancing Evaluation of Potential Dates Online Through Paired Collaborative Activities. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1849-- 1859. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  89. Doug Zytko, Jessa Lingel, Jeremy Birnholtz, Nicole B. Ellison, and Jeff Hancock. 2015. Online Dating As Pandora's Box: Methodological Issues for the CSCW Community. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW'15 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 131--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Who Would You Like to Work With?

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 2019
        9077 pages
        ISBN:9781450359702
        DOI:10.1145/3290605

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 2 May 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate703of2,958submissions,24%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        CHI '24
        CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        May 11 - 16, 2024
        Honolulu , HI , USA

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format