skip to main content
10.1145/3291992.3292004acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesadcsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring Interaction Patterns in Job Search

Published:11 December 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

We analyze interaction logs from Seek.com, a well-known Australasian employment site, with the goal of better understanding the ways in which users pursue their search goals following the issue of each query. Of particular interest are the patterns of job summary viewing and click-through behaviors that arise, and the differences in activity between mobile/tablet-based users (Android/iOS) and computer-based users.

References

  1. E. Agichtein, E. Brill, and S. Dumais. Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 19--26, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. L. Azzopardi, P. Thomas, and N. Craswell. Measuring the utility of search engine result pages. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 605--614, 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. S. M. Beitzel, E. C. Jensen, A. Chowdhury, O. Frieder, and D. Grossman. Temporal analysis of a very large topically categorized web query log. J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sc. Tech., 58(2):166--178, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. F. Cacheda and A. Viña. Understanding how people use search engines: A statistical analysis for e-Business. In Proc. Conf. and Exhb. e-Business and e-Work, pages 319--325, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. H. Cao, D. Jiang, J. Pei, Q. He, Z. Liao, E. Chen, and H. Li. Context-aware query suggestion by mining clickthrough and session data. In Proc. KDD, pages 875--883, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. B. Carterette. System effectiveness, user models, and user utility: A conceptual framework for investigation. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 903--912, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. E. Cutrell and Z. Guan. What are you looking for? An eye-tracking study of information usage in web search. In Proc. CHI, pages 407--416, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. K. Hofmann, S. Whiteson, and M. de Rijke. Estimating interleaved comparison outcomes from historical click data. In Proc. CIKM, pages 1779--1783, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. C. Hölscher and G. Strube. Web search behavior of internet experts and newbies. Computer Networks, 33(1):337--346, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. B.J. Jansen and A. Spink. How are we searching the world wide web? A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs. Inf. Proc. & Man., 42(1):248--263, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. B.J. Jansen, A. Spink, J. Bateman, and T. Saracevic. Real life information retrieval: A study of user queries on the web. SIGIR Forum, 32(1):5--17, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. B.J. Jansen, K.J. Jansen, and A. Spink. Using the web to look for work: Implications for online job seeking and recruiting. Internet Research, 15:49--66, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. J. Jiang, Y. Ke, P. Chien, and P. Cheng. Learning user reformulation behavior for query auto-completion. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 445--454, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. T. Joachims. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In Proc. KDD, pages 133--142, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pan, H. Hembrooke, and G. Gay. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. SIGIR Forum, 51(1):4--11, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Kudlyak and J. Faberman. The intensity of job search and search duration, 2014. Working Paper 14--12, Federal Researve Bank of Richmond, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2442910.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. R. Lempel and S. Moran. Predictive caching and prefetching of query results in search engines. In Proc. WWW, pages 19--28, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. B. Mansouri, M. S. Zahedi, R. Campos, and M. Farhoodi. Online job search: Study of users' search behavior using search engine query logs. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 1185--1188, 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. K. Ong, K. Järvelin, M. Sanderson, and F. Scholer. Using information scent to understand mobile and desktop web search behavior. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 295--304, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. C. Silverstein, H. Marais, M. Henzinger, and M. Moricz. Analysis of a very large web search engine query log. SIGIR Forum, 33(1):6--12, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. M. D. Smucker and C. L. A. Clarke. Time-based calibration of effectiveness measures. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 95--104, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Y. Song, H. Ma, H. Wang, and K. Wang. Exploring and exploiting user search behavior on mobile and tablet devices to improve search relevance. In Proc. WWW, pages 1201--1212, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. D. Spina, M. Maistro, Y. Ren, S. Sadeghi, W. Wong, T. Baldwin, L. Cavedon, A. Moffat, M. Sanderson, F. Scholer, and J. Zobel. Understanding user behavior in job and talent search: An initial investigation. In SIGIR Wrkshp. eCommerce, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. A. Spink, D. Wolfram, B. J. Jansen, and T. Saracevic. Searching the web: The public and their queries. J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sc. Tech., 52(3):226--234, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. A. Spink, S. Ozmutlu, H. C. Ozmutlu, and B. J. Jansen. U.S. versus European web searching trends. SIGIR Forum, 36(2):32--38, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. P. Thomas, F. Scholer, and A. Moffat. What users do: The eyes have it. In Proc. Asia Info. Retri. Soc. Conf., pages 416--427, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Y. Wang, D. Yin, L. Jie, P. Wang, M. Yamada, Y. Chang, and Q. Mei. Beyond ranking: Optimizing whole-page presentation. In Proc. WSDM, pages 103--112, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. A. F. Wicaksono and A. Moffat. Empirical evidence for search effectiveness models. In Proc. CIKM, pages 1571--1574, 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. W. C. Wu, D. Kelly, and A. Sud. Using information scent and need for cognition to understand online search behavior. In Proc. SIGIR, pages 557--566, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Y. Zhang and A. Moffat. Some observations on user search behavior. In Proc. Aust. Doc. Comp. Symp., pages 1--8, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Y. Zhang, L. A. F. Park, and A. Moffat. Click-based evidence for decaying weight distributions in search effectiveness metrics. Inf. Retr., 13(1):46--69, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ADCS '18: Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Document Computing Symposium
    December 2018
    78 pages
    ISBN:9781450365499
    DOI:10.1145/3291992

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 11 December 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    ADCS '18 Paper Acceptance Rate13of20submissions,65%Overall Acceptance Rate30of57submissions,53%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader