skip to main content
10.1145/3293614.3293629acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pageseatis-orgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Dengue 360: a business intelligence tool for analysis and dissemination of epidemiological situation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:12 November 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The numbers of dengue fever cases in Brazil have grown in recent years, with the arrival of other diseases related to the mosquito that transmits dengue fever (Aedes Aegypt), the situation is very alarming. This paper presents the development of Dengue 360, a tool built on the concepts and processes of business intelligence, which can be used to assist the analysis and dissemination of the epidemiological situation in a region. The goal is to provide information through maps, graphs and other visual artifacts that serve as a basis for decision-making by health managers so that they can create more effective prevention and control policies, as well as facilitate access to information about dengue fever in the region in which they live.

References

  1. N. H. Z. Abai, J. H. Yahaya, and A. Deraman. 2015. Incorporating business intelligence and analytics into performance management for the public sector issues and challenges. In 2015 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICEEI). 484--489.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Z. A. Al-Sai and L. M. Abualigah. 2017. Big data and E-government: A review. In 2017 8th International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT). 580--587.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. O. Ali, P. Crvenkovski, and H.Johnson. 2016. Using a business intelligence data analytics solution in healthcare. In 2016 IEEE 7th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON). 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. K. Böhm, A. Mehler-Bicher, and D. Fenchel. 2011. GeoVisualAnalytics in the public health sector. In Proceedings 2011 IEEE International Conference on Spatial Data Mining and Geographical Knowledge Services. 291--294.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Chaudhuri, U. Dayal, and V. Narasayya. {n. d.}. An Overview of Business Intelligence Technology. Commun. ACM 54, 8 ({n. d.}). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Secretaria de vigilância em Saúde. 2016. Monitoramento dos casos de dengue, febre Chikungunya e febre pelo vírus Zika até a semana epidemiológica 49. Ministério da Saúde, Brasília, DF.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. E. Gamma, R. Helm, R.Johnson, and J. Vlissides. 1994. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley, Indianapolis, IN. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. P. Gonzalez-Alonso, R. Vilar, and F. Lupiañez-Villanueva. 2017. Meeting Technology and Methodology into Health Big Data Analytics Scenarios. In 2017 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS). 284--285.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. W. H. Inmon. 2002. Building the Data Warehouse (4 ed.). John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. K. Jee and G. H. Kim. 2013. Potentiality of Big Data in the Medical Sector: Focus on How to Reshape the Healthcare System. Healthcare Informatics Research 19, 2 (jun 2013), 79--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. I. Kigwana, V. R. Kebande, and H. S. Venter. 2017. Towards an e-government framework for the Republic of Uganda. In 2017 IST-Africa Week Conference (IST-Africa). 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. R. Kimball and M. Ross. 2002. The Data Warehouse Toolkit. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. P. Loreto, F. Fonseca, A. Morais, H. Peixoto, A. Abelha, and J. Machado. 2017. Improving Maternity Care with Business Intelligence. In 2017 5th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud Workshops (FiCloudW). 170--177.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Pan American Health Organization and World Health Organization. 2016. Epidemiological Update: Neurological syndrome, congenital anomalies and Zika virus infection. PAHO and WHO, Washington, DC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. P. Shrivastava and M. Shukla. 2014. A Study on Some of Data Warehouses and Data Mining (Case Study of Data Mining for Environmental Problems). International Journal of Computer Science Trends and Technology 2, 1 (jan-feb 2014), 36--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Su and Y. Tang. 2017. Business Intelligence Revisited. In 2017 Fifth International Conference on Advanced Cloud and Big Data. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. K. Sunassee, T. Vythilingum, and R. K. Sungkur. 2017. Providing improved services to citizens, a critical review of E-government facilities. In 2017 1st International Conference on Next Generation Computing Applications (NextComp). 129--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. G. S. Fajar Surya and A. Amalia. 2017. The critical success factors model for e-Government implementation in Indonesia. In 2017 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoIC7). 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. E. Turban and L. Volonimo. 2013. Business Intelligence e Suporte á Decisão. In Tecnologia da Informaćão para Gestão: em busca do melhor desempenho estratégico e operacional (8 ed.). Bookman, Porto Alegre, RS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Dengue 360: a business intelligence tool for analysis and dissemination of epidemiological situation

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            EATIS '18: Proceedings of the Euro American Conference on Telematics and Information Systems
            November 2018
            297 pages
            ISBN:9781450365727
            DOI:10.1145/3293614

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            © 2018 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 12 November 2018

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate17of64submissions,27%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader